Posted on 11/25/2008 9:27:46 AM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo
“...it could have been a handicapped person and an attendant.”
As the lawyer for the said female in the article, that is exactly what she was doing. Interestingly, as another person here (”freepers” I believe you call yourselves) she was in the Men’s restroom because of the long lines at the Women’s restroom. Combined with a serious and painful medical situation that requires prompt use of the restroom facilities.
That’s our story and we’re sticking to it. ;)
Thanks! I feel better now.
Well I geuss when the score is 55-0 people look for other things to do. LOL!
OTOH it’s some what refreashing to hear about a sex scandal involving a guy and a girl.
Indeed.....
I think this is another example of poor journalism, and the writer was meaning to convey that both sets of feet had underwear around them... an attendant hopefully wouldn’t be semi-naked in there as well. Not to mention, two people having sex are going to be in a LOT closer physical proximity for a lot longer than even a handicapped person and their pantsless assistant. And, last but not least, I’d expect the noises coming from the stalls would vary greatly in the two situations.
SWIPED!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.