Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Stabs Pit Bull In Home Invasion
WFMY ^

Posted on 11/22/2008 5:19:40 PM PST by Chet 99

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 381-395 next last
To: Mojave

Look at the freakin’ posts yourself. It’s in THIS thread. I’m not going to hold your hand for you. If you can read enough into what I say to say I have a ‘gang banger mentality’ surely you can go back to the specified posts


301 posted on 11/23/2008 11:39:29 AM PST by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
>I didn't say that.<

Here's a novel idea. Instead of banning breeds, enforce strict dangerous dog laws, that mandate unpleasant penalties for those individuals who own dogs, regardless of breed who pose, through their behavior, a danger to society.

302 posted on 11/23/2008 11:39:35 AM PST by Darnright (A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Mr Inviso
Look at the freakin’ posts yourself.

They don't say what you allege. That's why you won't quote them.

303 posted on 11/23/2008 11:40:32 AM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
Instead of banning breeds, enforce strict dangerous dog laws, that mandate unpleasant penalties for those individuals who own dogs, regardless of breed who pose, through their behavior, a danger to society.

After the child is mauled, give the pit owner an "unpleasant" penalty.

That's one way to go. Some communities are deciding to be more proactive.

304 posted on 11/23/2008 11:43:54 AM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

“Look at the freakin’ posts yourself.
They don’t say what you allege. That’s why you won’t quote them.”

Wrong. Read:

“”It’s not necessary for the Gummint to make them illegal: all they need to do is declare them Contraband and announce a bounty. Well-armed law-abiding citizens can do the rest, at little cost to the taxpayer and no inconvenience to the erstwhile owners of the Pit Bull mungrel mutts.

There. Problem solved.””

“Here in New Zealand our gummint “trusts” us to do plenty of varmint control by ourselves. With real guns and no bounty. The gummint does not get involved.

“That is why mungrel mutt Pit Bulls need to be declared Contraband: so that it is illegal to own or breed them, and even more illegal to resist their lawful destruction. Just like a marijuana crop.”

“If there was a dangerous Contraband mungrel mutt Pit Bull on your property, chances are good that only my bullet would trespass on your property — at least initially. I wouldn’t want to get bitten.

Once the Contraband was dead I would execise Lawful Purpose to enter your property and retrieve my property (the mungrell mutt’s carcass) for Bounty.

“Lawful Purpose” is the same legal principle that meter readers use to enter your property and read the electricity meters. “Lawful Purpose” isn’t trespassing.

Right there. Black and white.


305 posted on 11/23/2008 11:45:46 AM PST by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
>After the child is mauled, give the pit owner an "unpleasant" penalty.<

After the child is mauled, give the pit owner an "unpleasant" penalty.

"After the person is killed by the gun, give the gun owner an "unpleasant" penalty." "After the person is killed by the drunk driver, give the drunk an "unpleasant" penalty." "After the person is killed by the knife, give the knifer an "unpleasant" penalty."

306 posted on 11/23/2008 11:56:38 AM PST by Darnright (A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: Mr Inviso
“If there was a dangerous Contraband mungrel mutt Pit Bull on your property, chances are good that only my bullet would trespass on your property —

Have him arrested.

307 posted on 11/23/2008 11:57:45 AM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

I didn’t notice pit bulls mentioned in the 2nd Amendment.


308 posted on 11/23/2008 11:58:43 AM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
"After the person is killed by the drunk driver, give the drunk an "unpleasant" penalty."

Interesting. You're arguing that drunk drivers should only be penalized after an accident happens?

309 posted on 11/23/2008 12:00:38 PM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

““If there was a dangerous Contraband mungrel mutt Pit Bull on your property, chances are good that only my bullet would trespass on your property —
Have him arrested.

Under his concept, that would not be possible because he was advocating making it LEGAL. That was one large point of what he was posting.


310 posted on 11/23/2008 12:03:13 PM PST by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

>You’re arguing that drunk drivers should only be penalized after an accident happens?<

I said that if you said you want to give Chinese Pit Bulls carte blanche to eat people.

I guess you think that a drunk who kills someone does not suffer anything more unpleasant than a drunk stopped for running a red light?


311 posted on 11/23/2008 12:05:46 PM PST by Darnright (A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
You’re arguing that drunk drivers should only be penalized after an accident happens?

So if drunk drivers can be penalized before they cause an accident, pit bull owners can be penalized before their animal mauls a neighbors child or pet. You shot down your own position.

312 posted on 11/23/2008 12:08:02 PM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
> You shot down your own position.<

Only if I had written drivers be penalized before they drink alcohol.

A "pit bull" in and of itself doesn't hurt anyone.


"Shelby, a Staffordshire-pit bull mix service dog, sits beside his owner, David Dalrymple"

313 posted on 11/23/2008 12:24:22 PM PST by Darnright (A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
A "pit bull" in and of itself doesn't hurt anyone.

By that "reasoning", a "drunk driver" in and of himself doesn't hurt anyone.


314 posted on 11/23/2008 12:27:59 PM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

>By that “reasoning”, a “drunk driver” in and of himself doesn’t hurt anyone.<

IF you want to call that idiocy “reasoning”.


315 posted on 11/23/2008 12:32:31 PM PST by Darnright (A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

It’s your reasoning.


316 posted on 11/23/2008 12:33:09 PM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

>it’s your reasoning.<

ROFL.


317 posted on 11/23/2008 12:43:08 PM PST by Darnright (A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
"After the person is killed by the drunk driver, give the drunk an "unpleasant" penalty."

Extreme short term memory loss?

318 posted on 11/23/2008 12:54:27 PM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

>”After the person is killed by the drunk driver, give the drunk an “unpleasant” penalty.”<

Ah, so I guess you are saying you want the death penalty for everyone who blows a 0.8 on a breath test, then.

Aren’t we the little Napoleon.


319 posted on 11/23/2008 1:08:26 PM PST by Darnright (A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
I guess you are saying you want the death penalty for everyone who blows a 0.8 on a breath test

You "guessed" wrong.

320 posted on 11/23/2008 1:10:11 PM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 381-395 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson