Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Harkins response to me

Posted on 07/12/2008 9:46:46 AM PDT by mywifecallsmerobi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: reagan_fanatic
“Tom Harkin is an ass.”

Asses from around the world resent that comment. They have higher standards than a Harkin.

21 posted on 07/12/2008 1:44:56 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mywifecallsmerobi

bookmark


22 posted on 07/12/2008 6:50:02 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy. Fight back or STFU!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mywifecallsmerobi

To Harkin...”What is it...ya do here?”


23 posted on 07/16/2008 8:25:49 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Obamafeld, "A CAMPAIGN ABOUT NOTHING".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mywifecallsmerobi
estimates are that drilling in ANWR would produce only the equivalent of a six month supply of oil, starting 10 years from now and continuing over about a 20 year production period. The Energy Information Association forecasts that opening up ANWR would only decrease the cost of gas 1-4 cents at the pump and only after 10-20 years.

He is a liar!


The consensus of the geologic community is that the Coastal Plain of ANWR represents the highest petroleum potential onshore area yet to be explored in North America. This potential is believed to be on the order of billions of barrels of recoverable oil and may rival that of the Prudhoe Bayfield.


Worried About Fuel Prices? ANWR Equals 30 Years of Saudi Oil

Arctic Power
April 01, 2001

24 posted on 07/16/2008 8:54:26 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mywifecallsmerobi

Discovery of the gigantic Prudhoe Bay oilfield was announced in July 1968, the largest deposit ever found in North America. (Environmentalists called it a “few months’ supply.”) Nine years, 7.7 billion dollars, and 1,347 government permits later, Americans cheered as oil began flowing through the 800-mile Trans-Alaska Pipeline System.

Making the case for Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) development

Too Much Imported Oil: Bad for the Economy

As domestic oil production continued its decline, the U.S. imported 58% of its petroleum needs in 2004. These oil imports cost more than $150 billion and robbed tens of thousands of steady, high-paying jobs from American workers.

More than 20,000 foreign supertankers (most single-hulled) offloaded oil at east, west and gulf coast refineries last year; they carry from 700,000 to 1.2 million barrels a day from Iraq alone. Foreign oil is produced and shipped under less strict environmental standards than domestic oil. Alaska’s oil fields are the cleanest in the world, second to none.

Through shortsighted actions, Congress and federal agencies have banned oil activity from more than 300 million acres of federal land onshore and more than 460 million acres offshore in the past 20 years. An estimated 67% of oil reserves and 40% of natural gas reserves are on federal lands in America’s western states.

Eighty-eight percent of the energy for America’s transportation, industry, government and residential needs comes from oil, gas and coal. No combination of conservation, technology or alternatives can come close to replacing these fossil fuels. It will take years for research, testing, permitting, construction, and distribution systems for replacement alternatives to be realized. When alternative energy sources become practical and economical, Americans will use them. Until then, fossil fuels must be relied upon.

Today’s domestic oil production comes from more than 150,000 wells scattered throughout the country; they average 15 barrels a day. There have been no new major discoveries in the 48 contiguous states in thirty years. As the U.S. population increases, the nation must either produce more or import more. Alaska’s Arctic is the most promising area for the largest supply with the smallest physical impact.

The U.S. economy benefits from domestic production when new construction, service, manufacturing, and engineering jobs are created. These jobs occur in all 50 states. A national impact study by Wharton Econometrics estimates total employment at full production in ANWR to be 735,000 jobs. Federal revenues would be enhanced by billions of dollars from bonus bids, lease rentals, royalties and taxes.

Alaska’s Experience as an Energy Supplier

Discovery of the gigantic Prudhoe Bay oilfield was announced in July 1968, the largest deposit ever found in North America. (Environmentalists called it a “few months’ supply.”) Nine years, 7.7 billion dollars, and 1,347 government permits later, Americans cheered as oil began flowing through the 800-mile Trans-Alaska Pipeline System.

Since July 1977, the pipeline has carried more than 13 billion barrels of oil from Alaska’s North Slope. During that time Alaska oil has supplied 20% of domestic production, amounting to nearly a $300 billion offset to the national trade deficit. Natural gas, produced with the oil, continues to be reinjected pending studies to determine feasibility of a pipeline to U.S. markets. Prudhoe Bay gas reserves are 30.9 trillion cubic feet.

Today the Alaska oil pipeline carries less than half its capacity; thus the search continues for new supply to keep it operating. (Without it, the entire system must eventually be decommissioned and removed.) The coastal plain of ANWR, 60 miles east of Prudhoe Bay and with similar geology, is America’s most prospective area for another giant oil field.

Studies of the ANWR coastal plain indicate it may contain between 6 and 16 billion barrels of recoverable oil (between 11.6 and 31.5 billion barrels in-place). With enhanced recovery technology, ANWR oil could provide an additional 30 to 50 years of reliable supply. Natural gas, produced with the oil, could be reinjected or added to a new gas pipeline originating in Prudhoe Bay.

Petroleum development at Prudhoe Bay has not negatively affected wildlife. For instance, the Central Arctic caribou herd is at home with pipeline facilities and has grown from 3,000 to as high as 27,100 in the last 20 years. Drilling activity in ANWR would be limited to winter months when wildlife does not frequent the coastal plain.

Constantly improving technology has greatly reduced the footprint of Arctic oil development. If Prudhoe Bay were built today, facility designs show the footprint would be 64% smaller.

1/2005


25 posted on 07/16/2008 8:58:07 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mywifecallsmerobi

The response from all in Congress has been Bull Crap for years. What did you expect?


26 posted on 07/16/2008 9:00:24 AM PDT by bmwcyle (If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
That is why I don't write them. I either call or fax so I don't get a response that is total crap because that makes me even more determined and angry.

This oil drilling controversy is not going away like they hope it will. Too many angry drivers paying the high cost of stupid people in congress.

For too long they have been able to cover their butts by issuing a press release which was repeated on MSM nightly 'news'. Now we can respond back and the MSM doesn't have a monopoly on 'news'.

27 posted on 07/16/2008 9:08:23 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Contacting them is still important but the Bull Crap they try to hand us in the form responses is insulting. It does not matter which party, these idiots are out of touch and screwing up the country with every move they make. I take their letters back to me and throw them in my dumpster before I walk in my house.
28 posted on 07/16/2008 9:26:59 AM PDT by bmwcyle (If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mywifecallsmerobi
Tom Harkin's Republican opponent, Christopher Reed
29 posted on 07/16/2008 9:32:26 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Independent Party: The citizen-led campaign to save America - www.selfgovernment.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson