Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kos’s Obama Birth Certificate Fake? [Hawaii Says It Did not Use "African" on Certs]
MacRanger Radio Show ^ | 6/12/08 | MacRanger

Posted on 06/21/2008 1:12:16 PM PDT by freespirited

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last
To: PapaBear3625
You really have to back this up with something. Kenya, as an independent country didn't exist until 1963. Until that time it was just a part of the British Empire.

It makes more sense for an Hawaiian clerk to write down "African" than to write down anything else, certainly not 1990's PC nonsense, and most likely not the name of a nonexistant country!

141 posted on 06/21/2008 5:38:37 PM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Valid point. Anything is possible when a doctor or nurse fills out a form.

I should have added two qualifiers. In 1961, I should have said that someone filling in the term "probably" would have used the word Negro (or possibly colored) and "almost certainly would not" use the term black. The word black was considered an insul. It did become accepted until the late part of the decade.

In the case of Obama's father, who, after all, was not an American citizen, the use of African at the time seems far more believable that black.

My point was to correct the poster's flat statement that a form filler woudl have used the black in all cases. This was not true, certainly in 1961. Negro was the standard word.

142 posted on 06/21/2008 5:38:39 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
I should have added two qualifiers. In 1961, I should have said that someone filling in the term "probably" would have used the word Negro (or possibly colored) and "almost certainly would not" use the term black. The word black was considered an insul. It did become accepted until the late part of the decade.

Okay, I get it now. You are right. "Colored" was the accepted term till the mid sixties when "black" became the new term. Negro was probably used longer on official documents.

I had a black guy go off on me recently when I told him there were only four races. He asked me what race I thought he was and I said he was of the Negroid race. He went crazy.

He insists he's African-American even though he's never even BEEN to Africa. I hate that term. It puts African first and leads one to believe that all Africans are black.

I asked him what you call a white person born in Africa and he said, "A foreigner". There are people in the U.S. who truly believe the garbage that Wright was spouting.

143 posted on 06/21/2008 6:07:23 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
'Which always prompts me to ask the question, “If a White man who was born and raised in the Republic of South Africa moved to the US and became naturalized, would he be an “African-American”?'

That was essentially the claim that Senator Kerry's wife, Teresa, made at one point during the 2004 campaign. Didn't fly...especially with African-Americans.

144 posted on 06/21/2008 6:08:12 PM PDT by Captain Rhino ( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I was talking about what would have been on a state form in Hawaii in 1961.


145 posted on 06/21/2008 7:18:10 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; Matchett-PI; MinuteGal; oldglory; mcmuffin; Bob Ireland
"The Sheriff is a N(clang)ER, Dammit!"

He said: The Sheriff is 'near'.

Is there anybody that doesn't get it yet?

'This election is not about race, dammit!'

I just love the dance moves, while everybody's prancing around - it's funny-as-hell ................. FRegards

146 posted on 06/21/2008 7:50:25 PM PDT by gonzo ( What Part Of "Shall Not Be Infringed" does anyone have a problem with? The USSC will soon wonder ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Is it possible that the original certificate has a religion field and it reads Muslim?
147 posted on 06/21/2008 9:21:47 PM PDT by Aldebert (Could religion be the problem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oswegodeee
Why is the certificate number blacked out?

Someone brought that up on the first thread. See post 158 and the post it is answering. Hope that helps.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2032572/posts

Also, the way it is blacked out looks like it was done by a computer, doesn't it? The people in HI govt told one of the bloggers that they would never send a cert out that way.

148 posted on 06/21/2008 10:00:45 PM PDT by freespirited (A Democrat is a person who lives in fear that someone, somewhere is proud to be an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Coffee200am
Isn’t all this stuff checked by some kind of US Department BEFORE someone runs for Pres?

I sincerely doubt it.

A candidate has to file a statement of candidacy. The govt probably accepts his word that he meets the requirements.

Have you ever applied for a professional license that asks if you have ever been in a psychiatric institution or some such thing? When you say no, the drones who process your application in most states don't check to confirm you are telling the truth. They take your word for it.

149 posted on 06/21/2008 10:06:12 PM PDT by freespirited (A Democrat is a person who lives in fear that someone, somewhere is proud to be an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Captain Kirk
We are talking about 1961. The claims advanced about "black" being the preferred word, or maybe "Negro" getting top billing, are malarky....I really wish folks would bother studying their 1960s history first.

So let me get this straight. I can take the word of the people who work in the Hawaii Registrar's office as to what terms they used in 1961. Or I can rely on a dude who spent his life debating the fine points of the domestic mail manual.

Man, this is a tough call.

150 posted on 06/21/2008 10:16:57 PM PDT by freespirited (A Democrat is a person who lives in fear that someone, somewhere is proud to be an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl
African is not a race, it is a nationality

It's not either. It's a continentality -- LOL!
151 posted on 06/22/2008 3:43:59 AM PDT by Beckwith ('Typical White Person')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
I believe the FBI would have done some type of Background Investigation prior to him becoming a US Senator.

There is no requirement to do a background investigation (BI) on a politician.

As a matter of fact, if it were made public that a BI was done on a political candidate it would be a scandal.

152 posted on 06/22/2008 3:48:28 AM PDT by Beckwith ('Typical White Person')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
There has to be a file on him at the Bureau containing a National Agency Check (NAC)

No, there doesn't.
153 posted on 06/22/2008 3:50:03 AM PDT by Beckwith ('Typical White Person')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
...mine is so old that each parent had only one name...

But, but, but....Obamer's mother had a different name than his father. What does that mean?

Another bastard dumped onto society.

I've said it before, but wonder what Clinton's birth certificate will reveal?

154 posted on 06/22/2008 4:11:36 AM PDT by CWWren (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress....but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

He is a disgrace to the whole country and thinks he is to good to critize. So, screw him.


155 posted on 06/22/2008 6:15:03 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
People who had authoritative clerk and registrar jobs in 1961 are, for the most part, long retired, speeding into senility or they are dead now. That's 67 years ago.

Today's informants in the Hawaiian government were most likely children in 1961.

156 posted on 06/22/2008 7:32:26 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

True. Even people who had such files may well have succeeded in having them removed, destroyed or lost.


157 posted on 06/22/2008 7:33:25 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

True. Even people who had such files may well have succeeded in having them removed, destroyed or lost.


158 posted on 06/22/2008 7:33:25 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Ooohh, you know, you are right. “South African” is a natinonality. Thank you for correcting me, and not in an ugly way as is the way of so many Freepers!


159 posted on 06/22/2008 7:37:28 AM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
BTW, when it comes to the Domestic Mail Manual I fully researched ALL the regulations all the way back to McKinley's Presidency before I changed a single word in the Postal Service Manual (which is what we mined to create the Domestic Mail Manual).

Uh, you do, of course, recall the Postal Service Manual don't you?

How about the Post Office Manual? Got a copy at home?

I thought so, all you know is the DMM, and you thought all I did was "debate the finer points" rather than write the FIRST ONE!

Yes, there really is an original DMM. I have the Federal Register at home in which it first appeared.

Now, absent some evidence that today's clerks and managers in Hawaii's birth registration organization have determined what the rules were in 1961, I probably wouldn't accept their word for it.

160 posted on 06/22/2008 7:38:32 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson