'North American Parliament' under way

worldnetdaily.com ^ | May 28, 2008 | Jerome R. Corsi

[B4Ranch]

If you weren’t so obstinate and did a little Googling now and then you would see that it is a serious issue, not common BS.

[calcowgirl]

Lots of unions and currency consolidations going on. It looks like the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries are really making some headway. A GCC common market was launched on January 1, 2008. They've already got their GCC Patent Office established. And they're working toward common currency in less than 2 years. The table at the bottom of the link is interesting, summarizing all of the regional trading blocks and their statistics.

So many flocks to herd at one time.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Where is the legislation? Where is the constitutional amendment? Where are the senate and congressional candidates running on the pro-NAU issue?

[hedgetrimmer]

Saving the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership: The Case for a North American Standards and Regulatory Area

“With its focus on setting common product standards, regulations, and border measures that will improve trade and the movement of goods, the SPP agreement has the potential to provide huge benefits for both the Canadian and American economies,” said Dr. Alexander Moens, author of Saving the North American Security and Prosperity Partnership and a senior fellow with the Fraser Institute.

Now it has a different name.

[calcowgirl]

The SAP partnership. How appropriate. ;-)

[B4Ranch]

I am not a legislator but I have serious hunch that the people who are in charge have this in a comittee or two or three. When they feel the day is right they will bring it out and get it passed very quietly and very quickly. If this means that will they tie it to another very much needed Bill, I don’t know.

[SunkenCiv]

100 university students from the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

...and in a straw poll, 99 of them voted for Barack Hussein Obama.

[Toddsterpatriot]

I am not a legislator but I have serious hunch that the people who are in charge have this in a comittee or two or three.

Who are the people in charge of this?

If this means that will they tie it to another very much needed Bill,

And they will get 3/4 of the states to ratify? That's funny.

I don’t know.

Yeah, I figured that.

[hedgetrimmer]

The Russian communists took over the Ukraine in a very similar way. They merely went in and set up ‘councils’ and started usurping the authority of the existing government. Pretty soon, people regarded them as the government because their legitimate government officials would join the councils as members.

These councils do the same thing. The “free traders” vest authority in them to develop ‘regulator harmonization’ for ‘trade’ ,that is change rules outside of the existing government, then tell the government to enact them. The SPP/NASRA/NAU promoters take a lot of their cues from the communists.

[Toddsterpatriot]

The “free traders” vest authority in them to develop ‘regulator harmonization’ for ‘trade’ ,that is change rules outside of the existing government, then tell the government to enact them.

Which rules were changed outside of the existing government? Who told the government to enact them? What was the vote in the house and senate on the new rules? Link?

[Katarina]

Thank you for posting this article.

[Katarina]

"BFD. This is a bunch of idealistic, liberal COLLEGE KIDS. Who really cares? "

Everyone should care, these are the future of our country and it does matter to me that they are liberal and not conservative in their thinking. This kind of thing would send off an alarm in the brain of even a college age person if they are a conservative.

[B4Ranch]

You are welcome, I’m glad to do it for those out there who don’t believe everything the MSM puts out.

[Czar]

"That’s about 75% better information than we get out of this government or their online regime."

What has become crystal clear is that the federal government no longer feels any obligation to tell the truth to the American people about anything. In he far distant past, only grave matters of national security were viewed as sufficient justification to withhold the truth from American citizens. Today's reality is that, except for the terminally clueless, nobody trusts the federal government.

[Czar]

"So many flocks to herd at one time."

Too many to watch, which is the idea. Politicians like nothing better than getting as far away from the voters as possible. Appointed but unelected officials are the order of the day. It really doesn't matter what they choose to name it--boards, districts, associations, commissions, advisers, consultants--they are all designed to mask and shield elected officials from responsibility and accountability.

[Czar]

"Now it has a different name."

New name = same snake.

[B4Ranch]

Actually I think the idea is to usurp the legal powers. When these boards, districts, associations, commissions or just bureaucrats make rules that have penalties they have slipped the blanket over peoples eyes. What used to require a vote of the 'majority' of the city council, now only takes one man.

The local appointed 'water commission' has tremendous authority to fine you if you violate the approved watering days.

[Czar]

"When these boards, districts, associations, commissions or just bureaucrats make rules that have penalties they have slipped the blanket over peoples eyes."

Mark this down as one of the first things we will change...

[1rudeboy]

I simply asked you to elaborate on your point. I assumed (incorrectly) that you are able.

[1rudeboy]

Especially if it deals with the PPP/NAU . . . .

What is the PPP/NAU? I know what NAU and PPP mean, but I've never seen them together. Are we playing "let's throw some acronyms together?" How about LOL/PPP/NAU?