Posted on 03/05/2008 7:58:52 AM PST by mnehring
The real solution isn't changing monetary policy, it is for the government to stop the micromanagement in the first place. Yes, you will have inflation, you will also at times have deflation.
I think what a lot of people don't understand with Paul's proposal of moving to Austrian Economic Theory is that inflation, deflation, recessions, depressions are not eliminated, on the contrary, Austrian Economic Theory states very plainly that these changes naturally occur often because of the simple nature of supply and demand. (Keizer, Willem (1997). Austrian Economics in Debate.) It is a direct part of the Mises-Hayek business cycle theory.
It is not the solution people think it is, it is just the government continuing to play with the currency.
But to get back to the point, even this debate is moving us right back to the problem- is the government there to really fix our problems? Every generation believes exactly like you, that things are getting worse. Yet looking back, every generation has improved upon the last.
Well - we agree that the government should stay out of the way.
Austrian economics does recognize the business cycle and inflation due to supply/demand, but does not encourage the creation of more money at a whim like our current system does. I don’t think it micromanages anything in its pure form.
As for evey generation being better off than the one before it - depends on how you look at it. And - (if it’s true) it can’t last forever. Many signs are pointing towards this being the time when things stall (or worse.) We’ve been able to materially live better than prior generations because we’ve borrowed to do it. If you can’t afford what you’ve borrowed you’re not really any better off - and you may be worse off if you get yourself in too deep. Maybe we (not you or I of course) are just dumber than previous generations in thinking that we are better off.
btt for edits
Welcome back. Being a Christian libertarian, I agree with your post 100%, except for the use of “fri- ckin”. :-) I’m in PA also, and I still plan on voting for Ron. I have followed Ron’s career for decades and have more respect for him than any living politician. I don’t believe the idea of freedom is popular in this nation anymore; most people just want security... financial, military, social. I don’t know what it takes to change that.
Our local paper decided to pick this up:
http://www.news-journal.com/search/content/news/opinion/stories/2008/03/07/03072008_letters.html
Alas, a slight bit of color in my language I don’t seem to be able to remove. Consider it spice. :-)
What will it take? Like I keep telling everyone here, I think President Obama will be a big step. And that’s for both sides. The right will (hopefully) realize that their obsession at supporting their holy war at all costs was not worth electing the most socialist major party candidate in US history. The left will (hopefully) see that he’s not the anti-war candidate they dreamed of, nor is he any less a puppet of big business. And people like me will remind them (on both sides) to their dying day of the opportunity they missed because they were so obsessed with their partisan worldview that they forced themselves to believe disgusting slanders about one of the most honest, principled individuals to ever run for the oval office.
America is hanging by a fraying thread anyway, so by then it will be far too late to solve it through electoral means. But hopefully the civics lesson will take hold enough to be part of the solution for whatever post-America future awaits us.
btt
bump to myself.
I think that says it better.
I like what you have to say, but you don't take it far enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.