Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trail of blood apparently led escaped tiger to victims
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Dec 27, 2007 | Kevin Fagen, Jaxon Van Derbeken, Steve Rubenstein, Cecila Vega

Posted on 12/27/2007 6:35:20 AM PST by fignewton

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last
To: Fawn
Why do you want to kill something that actually lives it’s [sic] life the way God intended?

Because that's sometimes the way God intended me to live my life. Like when a mosquito is sucking my blood, or ants or cockroaches are eating my family's food, or if a dog were to attack one of my kids....

41 posted on 12/27/2007 7:17:19 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Unfortunately for ‘blaming the zoo’ — there were footprints found INSIDE the tiger compound and the Darwinians had been taunting the tiger. As it is currently forbidden to have Little Black Sambo on library shelves, children today obviously do not know that tigers can eat you up.


42 posted on 12/27/2007 7:17:47 AM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Krankor
Could this have been a gang initiation?

Possibly, but probably not. Gang member initiations do not typically target zoo animals. Those “animals” typically go after human prey.

It probably had more to do with some young and very stupid guys trying to prove to one another how cool they were to one another.

”Hold ma beer and lookie here what I can do”

”Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.”

If one of these teenagers (drunk or not) thought it was cool and funny to try to enter the tiger’s compound then, while very sad and tragic that at least one of them paid for one brief moment of stupidity with their life and the other two were severely mauled, it was their own fault. They should have known better.

The tiger however was just doing what a tiger does. If they were entering her pen, they were evading her turf and she acted appropriately. Too bad the tiger is also now dead.

Just because a wild and predatory animal is kept in a zoo, it doesn’t mean the animal stops being wild and predatory.
43 posted on 12/27/2007 7:18:15 AM PST by Caramelgal (Rely on the spirit and meaning of the teachings, not on the words or superficial interpretations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Yes. They are silly.


44 posted on 12/27/2007 7:21:12 AM PST by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

Which is why in the wild, when a wild animal attacks and/or kills a human, the animal is put down.


45 posted on 12/27/2007 7:21:49 AM PST by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

F%&k the tiger. A person died.


46 posted on 12/27/2007 7:23:54 AM PST by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
But only because there's no other way to deal with such an animal in the wild (i.e. no other way to control it and/or prevent future attacks). That's not (necessarily) the case in a zoo.

In any event, I don't know why such attacks, as horrific as they are, come as such a shock. These cats are gonna do what comes natural.
47 posted on 12/27/2007 7:26:47 AM PST by LIConFem (Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
It's just a shame it ended this way for a very beautiful and magnificent tiger.

In almost any situation if the animal gets a taste of human blood, it has to be put down.

48 posted on 12/27/2007 7:27:07 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bboop

I guess this means they failed the lab portion of Seigfried and Roy’s online training seminar?


49 posted on 12/27/2007 7:27:21 AM PST by Cvengr (Every believer is a grenade. Arrogance is the grenade pin. Pull the pin and fragment your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bigoleelephant
You are missing the point that cats ~ ALL CATS ~ are highly complex animals with first class brain power.

They even sense the death of companion animals.

Obviously cats do not use language, and certainly don't read or write. At the same time they have to strategize about how to get through the herd of big bulls to attack the weak or the young so they can eat.

It's up to human beings to keep our true nature (as food animals for tigers) secret from them. Once they know it's all over and we must destroy them.

50 posted on 12/27/2007 7:29:48 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

These two brothers refused to give police their names at the scene... there were probably more of them - just these two got bit and scratched by the tiger and so couldn’t make a clean getaway.

Sounds like a gang had a zoo visit day.

The only question is if they intentionally fed Carlos to the tiger, or did Carlos’ initiation go wrong.


51 posted on 12/27/2007 7:30:16 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
It was a year overdue to put down this particular animal. Last thing a human being wants to do is teach a tiger that he, the human, is as weak, fragile and edible as a fawn.

Once you let out the secret you must dispose of the tiger.

They don't forget!

52 posted on 12/27/2007 7:31:35 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

The dead young man’s parents have been on a couple of networks this a.m. That didn’t take long.


53 posted on 12/27/2007 7:31:51 AM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

“The main question to ask is why this tiger was not put down a year ago when it nearly tore the arm off a zoo keeper?”

Because its a wild animal doing what wild animals do.


54 posted on 12/27/2007 7:32:54 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem; 7thson
You cannot afford to give the big cats even one small bite. If you do, you must destroy the cat.

Everybody knows that.

55 posted on 12/27/2007 7:33:28 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

That’s just the stupid knee jerk reaction.

It can still be a shame the tiger was put down, a victim of her circumstance just as much, or more, than the people were.


56 posted on 12/27/2007 7:34:11 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bboop
The PC crowd thought the story was all about the black kid when it was really about the tiger.

Well, so much for PC.

57 posted on 12/27/2007 7:36:49 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Well put,regards.


58 posted on 12/27/2007 7:39:11 AM PST by redstateconfidential (If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Once you let out the secret you must dispose of the tiger. They don't forget!

People should have been able to completely control her circumstance and protect her from attacking again. We took on that responsibility when we held her captive. She wasn't a housepet gone bad, she had no bargain with us that she breached.

59 posted on 12/27/2007 7:39:27 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“You cannot afford to give the big cats even one small bite. If you do, you must destroy the cat.

Everybody knows that.”

Evidently not everyone as this cat wasn’t ‘destroyed’.

To destroy a valuable and rare animal for doing what it does naturally is a knee jerk reaction. This cat should have never had access to a person due to its controlled environment. In the wild it would be different. In the wild it would be a threat.


60 posted on 12/27/2007 7:43:54 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson