Posted on 12/13/2007 12:09:09 PM PST by SubGeniusX
I do, in part. Microsoft, rather than abide by accepted standards, has repeatedly introduced its own. And because of its dominant position in the market, a number of wrong-headed Web developers have built sites for IE only, not bothering to test on other browsers, or even putting in a browser-detect javascript to lock out other browsers.
Should Microsoft stick to open standards? Yes. Should developers write standards-compliant code and test it on multiple platforms and browsers? Yes. Is this "should" something the courts can and should enforce? I don't see how.
Fortunately, IE-only sites are becoming less and less common. Security concerns led a lot of Windows users to switch to Firefox, Macs OX and Linux market share is growing, and anyone with a lick of sense can see that you don't want to slam the door in the face of potential customers, when it's just as easy to code to accepted standards instead of a single browser.
Even if IE/Windows has 90% of the eyeballs -- and I don't think it ever got that high -- who wants to drive off 10% of its customer base if it's easy to avoid?
Well guess what. Since the Microsoft VM wasn't compliant with the Sun Java standards, applications that are designed to work with the MS VM will often times NOT WORK with Sun's Java. This is the case with this company. Although I was eventually able to find the installable files on the Internet, and it can be installed on XP, this doesn't bode well for the future.
Mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.