Skip to comments.
Jury: Lisa Montgomery should be executed
Kansas City Star ^
| 10/26/07
| John Shultz
Posted on 10/26/2007 11:47:50 AM PDT by Huntress
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
I have mixed feelings about the death penalty, but if anyone deserves, Lisa Montgomery does. What a gruesome, horrible crime.
1
posted on
10/26/2007 11:47:51 AM PDT
by
Huntress
To: Huntress
One thing I appreciate about my old stomping grounds is that people out in the midwest have little tolerance for such barbarous acts.
To: Huntress
To: Huntress
The same type of death she dished out,,
4
posted on
10/26/2007 11:52:12 AM PDT
by
silentreignofheroes
(When the Last Two Prophets are taken, there will be no Tommorrow!)
To: Huntress
My conscience is torn about the death penalty, too. However, I do agree with the jury’s decision in this case. Such a wicked woman.
5
posted on
10/26/2007 11:52:43 AM PDT
by
samiam1972
(I'm a mommy of 4 now!!)
To: martin_fierro
6
posted on
10/26/2007 11:55:03 AM PDT
by
enough_idiocy
(www.daypo.net/test-iraq-war.html)
To: Huntress
I have none. If a murderer, or say a child rapist is put to death there is a 0% statistical chance of recidivism
Not only do “dead people tell no tales”, they don’t commit crimes either.
To: martin_fierro
8
posted on
10/26/2007 11:58:54 AM PDT
by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(This post sold by weight, not volume. Content may have settled during shipment.)
To: martin_fierro
EEEEWWWW!!!! Don’t tell me there are TWO of them walking around!!! ))))))SHUDDER((((((
9
posted on
10/26/2007 11:59:12 AM PDT
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: Huntress
I used to have a problem with the death penalty. I don’t anymore. I no longer am confused about whether the criminal cared about imposing the death penalty on their unsuspecting victim.
When people are murdered, people forget about the person that was murdered and whether that person wanted the death penalty.
That said, they have to be careful that their is no question that the person sentenced to death actually committed the crime.
If they can present evidence like DNA, they should be given the chance to do so.
This woman deserves the punishment. She will be alive far longer than her victim.
10
posted on
10/26/2007 12:00:44 PM PDT
by
dforest
(Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
To: Huntress
The older I get, the more mixed feelings I have about it too. The functional, rational side of me has no problems with it. But I always try to match up what I think and believe with scripture and I’ve never been absolutely sure that it is consistent with scripture. But it may be, it’s just that I’m not sure. Someday, I really need to study scripture with just that question in mind.
11
posted on
10/26/2007 12:12:10 PM PDT
by
twigs
To: martin_fierro
Now, this is strange......look at this picture - it's Hillary!
12
posted on
10/26/2007 12:17:05 PM PDT
by
Sonora
To: martin_fierro
EEEK!
What a miserable, evil looking thing. Her soul really “shines” through.
To: martin_fierro; wagglebee; Calpernia; EternalVigilance; MountainFlower; Jim Robinson
An even more diabolical resemblance is comparing what Lisa did to this one woman's child and what Hillary-supported abortion profiteers do to millions of womens' children.
14
posted on
10/26/2007 12:19:56 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: martin_fierro
Scary resemblance.
15
posted on
10/26/2007 12:20:34 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
To: Huntress
What she did is wicked beyond belief.
16
posted on
10/26/2007 12:22:45 PM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
Nicely worded. Although she killed the mother so she could claim the child as her own.
Her lawyer described her as "sick," apparently as a reason that she should not be executed. And yet, some people will argue that innocent unborn children with "genetic defects" should be killed. I don't get it. She has proven that she cannot function in human society. This jury definitely reached the right decision here.
17
posted on
10/26/2007 12:26:09 PM PDT
by
phrogphlyer
(Proud member of the contrarian fringe.)
To: Huntress
This is subhuman. It should be sent to a middle eastern country where they have many methods of delivering the death penalty.
To: twigs
"But I always try to match up what I think and believe with scripture and Ive never been absolutely sure that it is consistent with scripture." The Bible speaks about societal laws, being judged by a jury of your peers somewhere. There is no rule against the death penalty. God warns that that judgment shouldn't worry you, it's the one that comes next that should.
To: Huntress
My wifes elitist, effete, NE liberal scum relatives said that the death penalty was inhumane. I asked the pompous, arrogant communists how they think the 50,000,000 unborn children THEY have murdered since Roe vs. Wade felt when they recived their death penalty from these leftist vermin. No reply.
Unborn children are innocently executed. Murderers who kill innocent people deserve to be put to death so they cannot kill again and so that society can extract justice in the name of their dead victims!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
20
posted on
10/26/2007 12:37:27 PM PDT
by
Doc Savage
(The tree of liberty needs to be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson