I'm wondering if there's many of the "America is a soveriegn nation and it's time to open our eyes to what is happening" crowd left.
He who has an ear, let him hear. He who can see, let him see. For the others can't, won't or worse still, are part of the other sides game. Which is where we pick up with "enemies, foreign and domestic" crowds...
The North American Union that doesn’t exist, yet has it’s own official web site put up by the US Government, that will not bring the Amero currency, yet is being touted by the most recent former Mexican president...
Why do I smell treason in the air? Not that it matters- anyone in a position to do anything about it, is complicit in the plans...
SAVAGE NATION (((ping)))
If you saw Fox on O'Reilly last night, you know that Fox is so full of bovine excrement, his eyes are brown. He wouldn't even acknowledge that illegals crossing was a problem and it was the right of people to look for prosperity anywhere, regardless of the law.
Curious to know if you set this thread up in ‘chat’, or if it was moved, again. At some point they’re going to have to admit this IS happening. LOL...maybe that Rose Garden announcement will do the trick ;)
Isn't that what Ron Paul said yesterday too?
The USA is taking on the vanquished position more often than not! When the Clintons were in power I saw government decisions being made against the will of the people one after another. We have the same phenomena with the Bush Administration. Does the Bush Administration support a One World Government also? Will we soon be paying taxes to the United Nations, a Communist dominated organization? Or, is it just a matter of time before we do? Then when terrorists strike we will have our leader shake his or her fist with a tear in his or her eye and say we will track you down and catch you! ...like Clinton and Putin.
“Vicente Fox confirmed the existence of a plan conceived with President Bush to create a new regional currency in the Americas?”
Not on my watch!
11/2008 won’t come soon enough for me!
Congress is too busy with harassing Rush to do things that actually matter.
From the article:
Fox noted the FTAA plan had been thwarted by Hugo Chavez, the radical socialist president of Venezuela.
"Everything was running fluently until Hugo Chavez came," Fox commented. "He decided to combat the idea and destroy the idea."
Never thought I'd say "Thanks Chavez!"
Too bad he's such an evil whackjob.
Corsi liedVicente Fox did not say what Corsi claimed he said. Corsi's Oct. 9 WorldNetDaily article attacking President George W. Bush begins like this:
But it is all lies. Vicente Fox actually said nothing whatsoever suggesting that President Bush ever expressed support for "merger," or combining the dollar with any other currency, or replacing it with an "amero." Not a word. Here's a letter that I wrote to WorldNetDaily President Joseph Farah, detailing the lies in Corsi's article. I also faxed a similar letter. I've not yet received a reply. Criticizing a Corsi article is like shooting at a moving target. When confronted with particularly obvious misstatements in one of his articles, Corsi does not admit them, as an honest man would. Instead, he tries to hide the fact that the flaws were ever there, by editing his article on the WorldNetDaily web site, without any indication that he has done so. This is the earliest version I have of his article: Here's a later version, which he artfully edited to obscure some of the more obvious misstatements (but the thesis is still a lie): This is the current version, on the WorldNetDaily web site (perhaps the same as the "later version," above): This is CNN's transcript of Larry King's interview of Vicente Fox: Here's the relevant part of that transcript, not sliced and diced into pieces to change the meaning, as Corsi did, but with the entire section intact: KING: E-mail from Mrs. Gonzalez in Elizabeth, New Jersey. "Mr. Fox, I would like to know how you feel about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency?" FOX: Long term, very long term. What we propose together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all of the Americas. And everything was running fluently until Hugo Chavez came. He decided to isolate himself. He decided to combat the idea and destroy the idea... KING: It's going to be like the euro dollar, you mean? FOX: Well, that would be long, long term. I think the processes to go, first step into is trading agreement. And then further on, a new vision, like we are trying to do with NAFTA. KING: How is NAFTA doing? FOX: Excellent. Mexico's seventh largest trading economy in the world. Mexico trades more products and services than all of Latin America together, including Brazil, Argentina and all of them. And Mexico buys -- and this people don't know -- Mexico buys from the United States more products and services than what Italy, France, Germany and Britain do together. So we account for hundreds of thousands of jobs in this economy in the U.S. KING: An honor seeing you again. We'll make the next visit not so long. FOX: Thank you very much... As you can see, Fox did not say anything resembling what Corsi claims he said. Fox never suggested that Bush supports unifying the American dollar with any other currencies, or replacing it with a new currency. Let's look at the transcript line-by-line, and compare what it says to what Corsi claimed: KING: E-mail from Mrs. Gonzalez in Elizabeth, New Jersey. "Mr. Fox, I would like to know how you feel about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency?" Note that the question asked of Fox was what would he think of a common currency for Latin America. But here's what Corsi wrote:
Surely Corsi knows that the USA is not part of Latin America! Nowhere in their conversation did either Fox or King say anything about a common North American currency. So why did Corsi change "Latin America" to the USA, Canada and Mexico? Because a common currency for Latin America would be inconsistent with the Bircher "Amero" / "North American Union" hoax, which is an imagined secret plan to merge Canada, Mexico and the USA. The two ideas are incompatible: Latin America is Mexico and points south. North America is Mexico and points north. Mexico is in both Latin America and North America, but the USA and Canada are not part of Latin America. This was Fox's reply to Larry King's question, and King's interruption: FOX: Long term, very long term. What we propose together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all of the Americas. And everything was running fluently until Hugo Chavez came. He decided to isolate himself. He decided to combat the idea and destroy the idea... KING: It's going to be like the euro dollar, you mean? As you can see, Fox replied that there's no common currency in prospect for Latin America for a long, long time to come. Note that he neatly avoided answering the question he was asked, which was what he thinks of the idea of a common currency for Latin America. Fox's English isn't very good, but he is an experienced politician, who knows how to dodge a question! Then he changed the subject, to talk about something less pie-in-the-sky: trade reform (one of his favorite topics). That could have been accomplished, he said, if Chavez hadn't thrown a monkey wrench in the works. But look what Corsi said about it:
Corsi managed to cram three lies into just one partial sentence!
KING: It's going to be like the euro dollar, you mean? But it was no use. Fox is a skilled dodger: FOX: Well, that would be long, long term. I think the processes to go, first step into is trading agreement. And then further on, a new vision, like we are trying to do with NAFTA. As you can see, Fox again avoided saying what he thought of the idea of a common currency for Latin America, and just repeated his opinion that a common currency for Latin America couldn't happen for a long, long time. Then he again changed the subject to trade. What Latin America really needs, he said, is a trade agreement (which, as he'd just mentioned, Chavez is blocking). Then, he said, they need to work on finding a "new vision" in the region, which was an apparent reference to the need for much greater frendliness and cooperation between the Latin American countries than is possible with scoundrels like Hugo Chavez in power. Then Fox turned the conversation to NAFTA, which, he said, is part of an attempt to find a new vision of cooperation in North America. This time King gave in to Fox's change of topic: KING: How is NAFTA doing? FOX: Excellent. Mexico's seventh largest trading economy in the world. Mexico trades more products and services than all of Latin America together, including Brazil, Argentina and all of them. And Mexico buys -- and this people don't know -- Mexico buys from the United States more products and services than what Italy, France, Germany and Britain do together. So we account for hundreds of thousands of jobs in this economy in the U.S. That's what Fox actually said. But look at what Corsi wrote:
That's a complete fabrication. Fox said nothing at all about any plan to create an amero-type currency, and nothing at all about doing so for NAFTA, either. NAFTA, said Fox, is doing "excellent," increasing trade and creating jobs in both the USA and Mexico. He never suggested that there was any plan or need for a common currency. Corsi just made that up. Corsi also wrote:
But Fox said nothing at all like that. Corsi just made it up. It is a total fabrication. So are Corsi's headlines:
Corsi wrote three headlines, with not one word of truth in any of them! Contrary to Corsi's headlines, Vicente Fox said nothing suggesting that President Bush entered into any secret "long-term deal," or that he ever expressed support for "merger," or for the mythical "amero," or for combining the dollar with any other currency. Corsi's headlines, like his article, are just a series of lies. Corsi is a dishonest journalist, who discredits the WorldNetDaily news service. Joseph Farah should fire him, and apologize to his readers. |