Posted on 07/24/2007 3:03:17 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
That is possible. But another thought occurs to me. How much of this is all an elaborate ruse, or pretext for the globalists? The NACC may be more a collection of extortion victims, rather than the villains here.
I.e., How much of the NACC is the result of coercion directed against these supposed "titans" of the "private sector" who may in fact merely be stooges themselves?
My suspcion was aroused after seeing the list, I suspect some of these "leaders" who are ostensibly "impatient" and "demanding" are in fact schills for the governments themselves. Lockheed, for example, is so extremely dependent on DOD contracts, that it wouldn't DARE cross President Bush... He probably says, "Jump!" and their CEO says, "How high?" Or "I need a "constituency" for this lil 'ol NAU project I got going, you are volunteered." To be sure, that may not be the case for all these...but where were all these folks in this deal BEFORE W came along...
U.S. Representatives:
Canadian Representatives:
Mexican Representatives:
“What the heck do I know about “immoral” capitalism?”
How about the willingness to sell out you fellow citizenry for profit. You think that’s a good thing?
We are talking about the formation of the NAU......Right?
That’s ridiculous. Sure, it keeps peasants busy all over the world but, all you end up with is trash.
Why not make the whole damn thing where ever, pay $200 or $300 and have it last the for the better part of a lifetime.
Not only is that poor money management, it’s bad for the environment too.
Help me out here: are the Chinese more “moral” than Americans because they do a better job of limiting economic freedom?
I don’t know where you got that. The Chinese have subverted capitalism to the detriment of the American people (and sold us poison).
What is our trade and monetary deficit with them now?
And how the hell did we start talking about China anyhow? Oh yeah, they’re financing this whole NAU thing just like the war in Iraq. LOL!
I’m just fascinated by the whole “capitalism as immoral” argument. As if economic transactions between individuals free of coercion or other external force is somehow less “moral” than the alternative, having the government stepping-in and regulating those transactions.
The prez is not bending on the border agents? You are either for us or against us. IMO, the drug smugglers are as much the enemy as Al Qaeda.
David, the north american union is not the direction I want to go. I am appalled. Please mention your Duncan Hunter ping list here. Duncan Hunter is not for www.spp.gov.
And don’t forget the new provision for Marshal law. There may come a time where we are not permitted to protest or object to a north american union. We aren’t getting to vote on it which means this is tyranny 101.
I read back through my comments to see where we got off track.
I said, “To teach them an immoral and unprincipled form of capitalism known as Globalism.”
I don’t believe capitalism is bad nor, do I believe the Gov ever made anything better. However, when one makes a business deal only to have the other party/parties manipulate the terms of the agreement (using slave labor, hidden fees or tariffs, manipulating one’s monetary structure, etc.) That’s where the unethical, immoral, unprincipled parts come into play not, the way you interpreted what I wrote.
Bottom line: Don’t make agreements with tyrants, dictators or communists and expect it to be fair and balanced for all concerned.
The concept of "immoral capitalism" gets bandied-about quite a bit here, and I've never gotten the opportunity to see it developed. Suffice it to say I'm of the opinion that when someone uses the term, he or she means to write "immoral capitalist." No need to respond, I'm just navel-gazing.
Well, using the U.S. Army to keep people with honest inquiries out of the Quebec summit area in August is not going to help.
In fact, that safeguard against 'intruders' at the summit is all the information I need to draw a conclusion about the hidden agenda of the NAU plan.
Two thumbs down!
Exactly right, and in the process, they hope to distract from the message. It's a shame that half of these people have likely not even read the very documents about which Corsi writes and upon which we base our alarm and real concerns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.