Posted on 04/05/2007 8:46:45 PM PDT by Pistolshot
Yes, I confess: I am an evil genuis; I am Rove. :-)
True, but in the meantime, Carter encouraged the Islamists to overthrow the Shah and as a result we are STILL fighting Iran.
Thank you, Phil!
IT IS ABOUT TIME THAT WE VOTE FOR A CONSERVATIVE PERSON WHO WOULD LIKE TO BE PRESIDENT. IT HAS BEEN TOSSED AROUND THAT FRED THOMPSON WOULD MAKE A GOOD PRESIDENT. WHERE IS HE?
THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT HAVE RECENTLY LOSSED THEIR SEATS IN CONGRESS THAT WOULD BE GOOD CANDIDATES. EG ALLEN AND JD AND WHAT ABOUT THAT CLEAN AND ARTICULATE BLACK MAN, JC WATTS?
:-)
Hey, bud, what is that picture, I can’t see it?
Pretty soon they are going to take away the monkey bars from our playground and we won’t be able to play dodge ball at recess.........while any other games which are permitted to be played will require that the end result be that all FReepers are seen as “winners”.
All those memories of Carter’s inadequacy come back to haunt us with the taking of the Brits. Carter’s legacy is National Insecurity.... we’re still paying for it to this day, except the threat is worse.
Good post
Am very inclined to agree with you.
So, Conservatives, who couldn't even carry their own States as incumbants, would be a good bet to run for President. Brilliant idea!
Especially the ones that disagree with you, right?
And it’s always the same group: the purists; I’m sick to death of the GOP pandering to them.
FREEPERS!!! WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO US??
-
One single word.
“comprehensive”.
That’s what happened. It’s that simple.
You’re one more example of how RINOs always draw the 180 degree wrong conclusion from any set of events. And then, when you foul it up over and over, your standby position, as always, is to blame conservatives. It’s your MO.
My guess is he grew up. LOL! He kept things exciting. Those were the good ole' days. He kept Jim busy--kick him off and he'd be right back disguised as somebody else.
That’s because there are some here who are more interested in purging the Republican Party of elements they dislike than in winning elections.
Here’s a comment from one Freeper’s profile (EEE):
“Hate RINOs, moderates, centrists, etc.”
There’s no comment about hating terrorists, communists, fascists, pedophiles, murderers, rapists, etc. No comment about opposing ‘rats or liberals.
No, it is the “RINO’s” who are hated.
This mentality dislikes 50% supporters more than 0% supporters. This mentality defeated Mike DeWine and elevated Sherrod Brown. Mike supported the War and conservative judges, but his lifetime 80% ACU Rating wasn’t good enough so 4% Sherrod Brown was elected. That enabled Reid and made the difference in the vote last week.
Frankly, I’m tired of the threats of non-support from the radicals. The threats to withhold support in the general election cut no ice with me. It’s impossible to reason with people who think the 1992 strategery of “teaching a lesson” is a good idea in 2008. The radicals are the ones who need to be taught a lesson — their numbers aren’t enough to dictate policy.
As opposed to you and your wonderful band of "impurists," of course.
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.