Posted on 02/15/2007 2:15:09 PM PST by JohnSheppard
WinME was never this much of a cluster, in fact it's downright nice. The popular opinion of it seems based on what everyone's HEARD, what their brother's girlfriend's sister's best friend supposedly had happen with it.
I use it daily. Far less hassle.
Have you read this?
http://www.forbes.com/2007/02/10/microsoft-vista-drm-tech-security-cz_bs_0212vista.html?partner=globalnews_newsletter
Actually, both the FA311v1 and FA311v2 work just fine with Linux. You're pointing to a page quoting Netgear's official postion, not reality.
just what the page says, it's junk hardware... if you have junk... use linux(and even then you may well have problems IF you're talking about certain winmodems and such **yes SOME work, some don't**)
Interesting, if somewhat incoherent, response. The page merely points out that it's at EOL and that they aren't going to support it. There's nothing particularly junk about it.
That's a classic case of YMMV. ME was what sent me to Apple. I had just started getting seriously into photography, and WinNT, although it had been fairly stable, had a terrible time connecting to my camera or USB readers. I tried ME, because MS was selling it as being the OS to use for the new peripherals. It had an annoying habit of killing the USB ports when I'd eject a flash card. I had to delete the USB ports, then start an install new hardware wizard and reinstall them. That worked about a third of the time, but I usually had to reboot before the wizard would find them.
The color balance on my printer changed radically from print to print on ME. One afternoon, I spent about $40 worth of ink and paper trying to get the printer and computer synched, but it never did much good because the printer would print the same photo with dramatic changes in color between two prints done one after the other.
Interestingly enough, upgrading the video card was the killer, and that wasn't MS's fault. The CD that came with it didn't do anything but install adware. They hadn't included a driver on the disk, but all the adware was designed to look like it was installing the driver. Finally, I found the driver at their web site, but Windows kept stating it wasn't the correct driver. I had to override several warnings to get it to take, but once every couple of weeks it would lose it, and I'd have to do the force override thing again. A few weeks later I bought my first Mac.
XP works fine. I won't buy Vista until I get a new computer.
Hmmm...exactly what I said. So, your position is that when a company creates a new version of something and subsequently quits supporting the older version(s) that this is an indisputable indication that the previous version(s) was/were junk?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.