Skip to comments.
Government admits lying about jailed border agents (DHS fesses up - Rep. Poe ticked!)
World Net Daily ^
| February 6, 2007
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 02/06/2007 6:18:29 PM PST by calcowgirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 521-540 next last
To: marron
....and they are probably more honest than the guys who prosecuted them. Heck, the Mexican drug runner is more honest and upstanding than these prosecutors.
To: rednesss
The National Border Patrol Council of the American Federation of Government Employees.... they took the multiple press releases put out by Sutton and corrected the record on all the things he claimed were realility.. for instance, did you know Sutton claims this all took place in the middle of the night -- when, in fact, it took place in broad daylight at one o'clock in the afternoon.
In this case Sutton claims Ramos stipulated the bullet came from his service weapon....
in fact he did not and an Army surgeon at William Beaumont Army Medical Center removed a bullet fragment from the smugglers right thigh on March 16, 2005 at 7:45 p.m.
That evening Christopher Sanchez an investigator with the DHS Office of Inspector General, took Davila AND the bullet fragment to his personal residence for the night.
This action broke the chain of custody for the bullet fragment. The following day Sanchez submitted the bullet to the Texas Department of Public Safety for testing. The report concluded the bullet was fired from a barrel having six lands and grooved inclined to the right.
The manufacture of this bullet could have been from five different types of guns and because of the handling of the bullet the DNA was removed and could not be conclusively linked to the smuggler or either of the BP agents.
This alone casts reasonable doubt on the entire case.... because we do not know, beyond a reasonable doubt, this bullet came from either agents weapon of if this man was shot at another place and time.
Too many unanswered questions in this case for them to be serving ten years in prison.
To: La Enchiladita
Dear White House:
What the &*^#*&$%^$% is wrong with you?
madison10
To: holyscroller
I believe the gov't and prosecutors are protected by sovereign immunity
404
posted on
02/07/2007 9:03:52 AM PST
by
erton1
To: AGP; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; Angelwood; Apple Blossom; beandog; BillF; bmwcyle; ...
DC Chapter short list ping
In case you missed this.
405
posted on
02/07/2007 9:04:14 AM PST
by
BufordP
("Every morning I start my day with juice, toast, and a big bowl of Baby Crunch!" -- Michael J. Fox)
To: rednesss
You are being a jerk on this thread, but I'll answer nonetheless: The angle of the bullet was as follows: It entered the lower left bottocks and passed through the pelvic triangle and lodged in his right thigh. In CSO-speak this is consisten with the motion of a left-handed person running away while point backward, causing the body to twist. The agents both testified he was running away and pointing an object that appeared to be a gun at them.. the evidence of the bullet path actually bears out their testimony.
To: Arizona Carolyn
It appears that the original poster was saying that Sutton was brought in to prosecute this case and that he is not the USA in the western district.
407
posted on
02/07/2007 9:06:35 AM PST
by
erton1
To: calcowgirl
I'm so glad Ted Poe is my Representative.
To: erton1
I believe it was his district... he actually has his hands all over an even dirtier case than this case... but he was promoted, recently, by his friend Alberto Gonzalez.
To: editor-surveyor
Then obviously the jury didn't believe the testimony.
410
posted on
02/07/2007 9:09:33 AM PST
by
erton1
To: erton1
The jury was not allowed to hear the testimony.
To: Arizona Carolyn
I can assure you that Sutton is the USA for the western district. I am not aware of any promotion of Sutton.
412
posted on
02/07/2007 9:15:07 AM PST
by
erton1
To: Arizona Carolyn
I can assure you that Sutton is the USA for the western district. I am not aware of any promotion of Sutton.
413
posted on
02/07/2007 9:15:10 AM PST
by
erton1
To: Arizona Carolyn
You have allowed opinion into your assertion of facts, and expressed disputed facts as if they are incontrovertable.
To: editor-surveyor
So you deny they shot at the man?
You deny Compean picked up his shells?
You deny that Ramos exceeded the speed limit in chasing the van?
You deny that the two agents did not inform the supervisor?
You deny that the two agents filed reports which were false?
To: editor-surveyor
Are you saying that the rules of evidence were violated by the trial judge, or that the agents had incompetent counsel. If the judge erred, then that would be a point of error for the appeal, assuming the error was preserved for appeal. My understanding is that the agents retained their own attorneys and that they were not appointed by the court.
416
posted on
02/07/2007 9:20:35 AM PST
by
erton1
To: CharlesWayneCT
You deny that Ramos exceeded the speed limit in chasing the van? LOL.
417
posted on
02/07/2007 9:22:17 AM PST
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: erton1
Let's not forget the misrepresentation by Ms. Debra Kanof (you can google her photo).
418
posted on
02/07/2007 9:26:30 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: Arizona Carolyn
Does any of this have to do with whether the agents are guilty or not. I frankly doubt the 5th Circuit cares on appeal about these allegations.If I were these guys, I would be preparing for the appeal, getting a legal defense fund together and hiring new, criminal appellate specialist attorneys. I will be surprised of anything in the way of a pardon is going to be considered until the appellate process is over. Btw please show me where Sutton claims the incident occurred at night. My understanding is the testimony at trial was that it occurred at 1 p.m. in the afternoon and his talking points indicate the same.
419
posted on
02/07/2007 9:36:37 AM PST
by
erton1
To: AnnaZ
Prolly smoking a cigarette and driving under the influence of a Big Mac with fries. The shame!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 521-540 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson