Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top tech firms back Linux over Vista
Bangkok Post ^

Posted on 01/24/2007 7:55:46 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: HAL9000; js1138


But Mac users don't have a cesspool of worms, viruses, spyware and spambots partying inside our computers, wrecking the place. That trash lives in the house of Windows.


And linux!


21 posted on 01/24/2007 7:22:22 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
DIY! All your home builds are belong to lian-li =^)


22 posted on 01/24/2007 7:24:23 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

http://en.opensuse.org/Welcome_to_openSUSE.org


23 posted on 01/24/2007 7:25:15 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Linux, the #2 OS. Mac, the #3 OS. That's why Picasa is on Linux and not Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
But Mac users don't have a cesspool of worms, viruses, spyware and spambots partying inside our computers, wrecking the place. That trash lives in the house of Windows.

In twenty years of dealing with PCs professionally I have only seen two viruses in a business environment. One was in the DOS days as transmitted by a floppy, and one was Melissa. Neither caused any damage, other than taking some time to disinfect.

The folks who tried to download free music got burned pretty bad by Kazaa, but it wasn't without warning. Walk in bad neighborhoods and you can be mugged. No OS can protect itself if people insist on installing malware.

I once installed a batch of spyware included in a CNET download. My bad for assuming CNET wouldn't distribute malware.

If you install something bad from a trusted source (say Sony) you will override whatever warnings the OS might present. If it asks for a password, you will enter the password, because the source is someone you trust.

24 posted on 01/25/2007 10:48:06 AM PST by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: js1138
The 10 Most Destructive PC Viruses of All Time.

Note that every single one affected Microsoft software and ONLY Microsoft software. No where on the list is a virus or worm that affects MySQL or Apache or Solaris.

While you personally may not have encountered them, malware on Windows has cost American businesses, conservatively, tens of billions of dollars and likely well into hundreds of billions of dollars.

This does not include the cost to businesses of trying to stay ahead of the malware deluge through patching, anti-virus and anti-spyware, or the training of users and technicians to avoid and clean up infections.

Because of inherent design differences, OSX, Linux and the BSDs are substantially less susceptible to the kind of infections that plague the Microsoft family of operating systems.

25 posted on 01/28/2007 4:22:53 AM PST by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Knitebane

The top ten, huh? Odd that it doesn't mention the only piece of malware that brought down the entire internet.

The rest are familiar. I've seen them in the log files of virus scanners. Although I manage both Exchange servers and SQL servers, I've never seen a machine affected by any of these. None of these viruses or attacks could harm a machine having routine preventive management.

As for people who have been harmed by them, I make it a point not to take advice from people who don't know how to make PCs work properly.


26 posted on 01/29/2007 12:13:37 PM PST by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
What gives me pause is that now the slightest change in hardware configuration on my computer prevents reinstallation of VISTA. I ususally am forced to upgrade something at least once a year (sometimes more) and I don't look forward to a) wiping my computer totally clean each time, or paying for another copy of the OS.

While there are definitely DRM issues with Vista, this isn't going to be one of them. As usual, things get twisted in media reports, and technology reporters are no different than political reporters when it comes to getting things twisted up. Changing a drive, card, or any other device isn't going to force you into a re-load, and most likely won't even result in a hiccup at all. While Vista was originally planned to limit the OS to three transfers, MS has backed off of that and given Vista the same license that XP has, which is unlimited transfers from system to system. Relax. At the very worst you may have to take two minutes to re-activate in some extreme circumstances. Nothing more.

27 posted on 01/29/2007 12:23:38 PM PST by Space Wrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: js1138
The top ten, huh? Odd that it doesn't mention the only piece of malware that brought down the entire internet.

Not odd at all, considering that the Morris worm was:

a) unleashed onto a much, much smaller Internet

b) mainly affected academic systems as there wasn't much commerce on the Internet then

c) an accident. (And therefore usually not considered malware)

The rest are familiar. I've seen them in the log files of virus scanners. Although I manage both Exchange servers and SQL servers, I've never seen a machine affected by any of these.

Then you must live under a rock, considering that 90% of businesses have experienced malware that interrupted their business at one time or another.

None of these viruses or attacks could harm a machine having routine preventive management.

Actually, Slammer was more effective against machines that hadn't been regularly patched.

A recent Microsoft patch had the effect of disabling a previous patch that fixed the vulnerability that Slammer used.

So not even rigourous and consistent management is a cure-all when you are using Windows.

28 posted on 01/30/2007 3:38:21 AM PST by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Knitebane
Actually, Slammer was more effective against machines that hadn't been regularly patched.

OK.

29 posted on 01/30/2007 10:47:35 AM PST by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: js1138
That should have been:

Actually, Slammer was more effective against machines that had been regularly patched.

Serves me right for posting with an insufficient level of caffeine in my system.

30 posted on 01/31/2007 12:45:46 AM PST by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson