Posted on 01/17/2007 5:22:39 PM PST by Zechariah_8_13
Arkansas, again? 
 
Klintoon comes to mind.
I think "garbage" applies to the photo. 
 
Which proves nothing. 
 
To me, it just reminds me of the dreaded (to the reasonable) "orb" photos in the ghost world. 
 
They are just a bunch of colored orbs with no special shape, and this photo has no other detail at all to it to allow any real connection to something "other-worldly". 
 
His story is more interesting than the photo. Photo proves nothing.
They are all about equally motion-blurred, in the same direction.
Relative to a question on this thread ABOUT fuzzy photos . . . there's this fascinating thread on ABOVETOPSECRET.COM AT: 
 
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread133299/pg13 
 
This is also the "blog" that John Lear mentioned on C2C last night. Below is from just one multipage section. There are more than 14 sections. 
 
= = = = = 
 
sleeper 
 
Member 
 
Registered: 25/6/2004 
 
 
Mood: 
Member was on ATS 
56 minutes ago. 
 
ATS Points: 16158 
BTS Points: 3966 
PTS Points: 1971 
 
Ignore this user (info) 
ignore 
 
Vote for this user (info) 
way above 
 
 posted on 10/5/2005 at 07:28 (post id: 1396623) - single - this post 
 
quote: Originally posted by s7e6e 
Sleeper, why do you think that all pictures of ufo's are blurred and fuzzy? 
 
Why do you think that all ufo sightings are summary described ? 
 
ETs are slowly making themselves known, eventually they will come out and everyone can take pictures of the neatto flying machines and them----but Im thinking it will not be for sometime yet. 
 
We have stealth aircraft designed to avoid radar and other forms of detection because we wish to remain incognito during reconnaissance. 
 
The ETs have the ability to mask their ships in infinite ways, including making them very difficult to photograph. They are invisible most of the time and uncloak only when they want certain people to see them-----however, they dont allow clear photos of their ships because they are not ready to make full contact. 
 
That is why most contactees can only give brief statements of their experiences----nine-five percent of what most experience is blocked from memory------regression only reveals what the aliens allow and most of the time info from regression is only stuff the ETs put there for that purpose-----ETs are not as dumb as some people think. 
 
But ETs will dictate information telepathically like questions asked of them-----seeing is believing, they know this and dont want much of their stuff described on the front pages of newspapers. 
 
quote: Originally posted by s7e6e 
 
how come you're still here, beeing able to speak rather than dead ?!? Do you actually think that someone believes just because he wants to? 
 
Im still here because obviously Im no threat, being slightly entertaining is not going to upset the apple cart of the military or the ETs. 
 
Obviously the ETs want some of this out there, a little at a time otherwise no one would be able to tell their stories. 
 
The military cant whack people like me without permission from the ETs. 
 
quote: Originally posted by s7e6e 
Proof is what makes beliefe a constant and not a variable. 
 
 
I agree one hundred percent------without proof I wouldnt believe either-----and I believe one hundred percent. 
 
signature 
We are not here to change the world---we are here so that the world can change us 
 
member bloguser profilefind postssend u2u copyright 
 
COPYRIGHT IS OWNED BY THE POSTER AND CO-OWNED BY ATS.COM SEE THEIR COPYRIGHT POLICY FOR INFO.
ibid: 
 
sleeper 
 
Member 
 
 
 
 
 
Registered: 25/6/2004 
 
 
Mood: 
Member was on ATS 
56 minutes ago. 
 
ATS Points: 16158 
BTS Points: 3966 
PTS Points: 1971 
 
 
 
 
Ignore this user (info) 
ignore 
 
Vote for this user (info) 
way above 
 
 posted on 10/5/2005 at 12:12 (post id: 1397084) - single - this post 
 
 
quote: Originally posted by mbkennel 
 
1) what precisely are they doing here, and why? 
 
2) what is the purpose of their limited, and apparently involuntary, interactions with certain humans? 
 
3) why certain humans, such, as, apparently, yourself? 
 
4) why do they apparently allow marginal independent contact, but do not make full and open diplomatic relations with the population as a whole? 
 
5) Do they believe this is ethical? 
 
6) why haven't they bothered to ask us about it? 
 
 
1. This planet is in the incubation stages----there are more than one race of ETs here because there are many programs involved----humans share identical DNA because that is a requirement of this planet-----but that doesnt mean all humans originated from one place, but from hundreds of places in the galaxy. 
 
2. They interact with those they use as vehicles to bring things into this planet, like technology, and higher awareness. 
 
3. I was willing to work cheap. 
 
4. The population as a whole would revolt against an entity from other worlds-----not everyone wants ETs down here telling us what to do. The vast majority is not ready. 
 
5. It is ethical to keep this planet from a mental meltdown, because thats what would happen if all of a sudden humanity became aware that there are thousands of ET ships on earth, on the moon, in orbit around the planet and throughout the solar system. 
 
6. We wouldnt understand the question. 
 
 
 
quote: Originally posted by mbkennelIf they had the ability to colonize the galaxy why it wouldn't be bursting with obvious EM signs that we would have seen with SETI. {Frankly I would have thought that if major ET civilizations with interstellar travel were possible, then SETI would have given a positive result the very first time it was turned on, as thousands of solar systems would be giving artificial emissions. 
 
 
Humans have yet to hatch out of this planet yet we believe that we can pick up advanced extraterrestrial communications. Humans are a few hundred years from that kind of ability. SETI is the pioneer, but they hardly have any devices to detect exotic ET stuff. 
 
There are thousands of alien ships buzzing all over the place right here on earth and our technology cant detect them, yet we point our equipment at places light years away and we expect what? 
 
It wasnt that long ago that we communicated with smoke signals, and cuneiform tablets. The electromagnetic spectrum is a nice communications vehicle for us today, but its not what the big boys in galaxies faraway play with. 
 
 
signature 
We are not here to change the world---we are here so that the world can change us
PING
Strange lights, wish they were more defined so that features could be seen.
Observations of what? Flashing lights? What does it prove one way or another?
True . . . did you read the sleeper blog excerpts?
I didn't observe any flashing lights. 
 
The lights were solidly on and rather large in proportion to the craft, it seemed. The craft was very clearly discernable in the binoculars and looked exactly like a number of photos of such on the web.
The Belgium flurry of sightings were almost all triangular UFOs, which suggests that the triangular ones are *not* "ours".

 Get me sugar...and water.
The Belgium flurry of sightings were almost all triangular UFOs, which suggests that the triangular ones are *not* "ours". 
= = = 
 
The assumption, inferrence is not necessary at all, imho. 
 
35+ years ago my relative insisted that our craft could go virtually or literally instantly to any spot on the globe either under computer control or piloted. 
 
I personally don't know whether ALL triangle craft are ours, or not. I just heard John Lear say so. He has a lot better connections than I do. 
 
But our craft have been roaming unfettered over the entire globe for decades. Some say to the moon and Mars besides.
That was my first thought too. I usually refuse to read WND, but needed a laugh this morning.
And yet, they decided to converge on Belgium back in the 1980s...
Belgium . . . the budding globalist capital . . . 
 
could have been many reasons. 
 
But I don't really KNOW that ALL triangles are man made and ran. It's just that John Lear believes that's so and said so. 
 
The sleeper thread on ATS.COM is 110 sections long. I'm noly on 31 
 
He's clearly bought into a chunk of disinformation. Doesn't even believe Jesus was a real person. 
 
Great Deception times, for sure. 
 
Thanks for your pings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.