Skip to comments.
BULL CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES - NCAA Division 1-A Football is Sports' Biggest Fraud
January 8, 2007
| L.N. Smithee
Posted on 01/09/2007 2:27:09 AM PST by L.N. Smithee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: L.N. Smithee
Here's the dirty little secret the NCAA won't discuss: Under the current system, of the 112 Division 1-A college teams
You are preaching to the choir about the BCS sham but you need to do a little research before writing. It's no secret there are 119 division 1-A teams. Also The NCAA is phasing out the terms Divisions I-A and I-AA that applied to football. I-A is now the Football Bowl Subdivision, while I-AA is the Football Championship Subdivision.
2
posted on
01/09/2007 2:39:31 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: SmithL; GOP_Raider; OrioleFan; Triggerhippie; DarthVader; Sir Gawain; skimask; mockingbyrd; ...
Here's what else I have to say about this. Enjoy, or not.
3
posted on
01/09/2007 2:45:08 AM PST
by
L.N. Smithee
(Bush/Fox Border Policy in a nutshell: "Rape is inevitable. Relax and enjoy it.")
To: Man50D
Boise State is WAC, not Mountain West, for starters.
Second, according to the BCS rules a non-BCS conference team that finishes in the top 12 will receive an invite to a BCS game.
Third, the majority of Division 1-A ADs will never agree to a playoff system under the current configuration. Why? Because currently sixty-four teams get a chance to play in thirty-two bowls, there is more money to be had under the bowl system.
4
posted on
01/09/2007 2:47:45 AM PST
by
Hawk1976
(Vince Mcmahon '08)
To: Man50D
You are preaching to the choir about the BCS sham but you need to do a little research before writing. It's no secret there are 119 division 1-A teams. Also The NCAA is phasing out the terms Divisions I-A and I-AA that applied to football. I-A is now the Football Bowl Subdivision, while I-AA is the Football Championship Subdivision.I have done a ton of research about this topic that was leading up to this thread, but didn't plan on doing it tonight/this morning. I got so ticked at the dismissal of Boise State tonight I just laid it out. It's almost 3 am on the West Coast, and I knew I would make a couple of mistakes, and hoped they wouldn't be big ones.
For the record: Under the current system, of the 119 NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision (sheesh!) college teams, 52 of them can't possibly win a national championship no matter what.
5
posted on
01/09/2007 2:55:07 AM PST
by
L.N. Smithee
(Bush/Fox Border Policy in a nutshell: "Rape is inevitable. Relax and enjoy it.")
To: Hawk1976
Boise State is WAC, not Mountain West, for starters.Maddoggit, that was a big one.
Nevertheless, the WAC champ doesn't have a shot at a BCS bowl under normal conditions either -- its predetermined place in the bowl system is the MPC Computer Bowl in Boise.
6
posted on
01/09/2007 3:00:18 AM PST
by
L.N. Smithee
(Bush/Fox Border Policy in a nutshell: "Rape is inevitable. Relax and enjoy it.")
To: L.N. Smithee
There were a lot of teams with 6 6 records getting bowl bids!
7
posted on
01/09/2007 3:04:01 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: L.N. Smithee
Time to get rid of the BCS and go back to ending the season on New Years's Day.
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Texas Tech (8-5) celebrated like they won the Super Bowl after defeating Minnesota (6-7). Yes, they overcame a huge second half deficit. But they fell behind to a team that was 6-6 overall 3-5 in their own conference.
That's a Bowl Game?
9
posted on
01/09/2007 3:11:31 AM PST
by
joeystoy
To: Hawk1976
Third, the majority of Division 1-A ADs will never agree to a playoff system under the current configuration. Why? Because currently sixty-four teams get a chance to play in thirty-two bowls, there is more money to be had under the bowl system.The ratings for the bowl games leading up to New Year's Day are miniscule. There is more money to be had in a playoff system because the games would actually mean something leading up to the championship game. The Times article said the current TV contract would have added another $40 million if they just added one more game in a playoff format. The teams with 7-4 or 6-5 records might be out in the cold for the real prize, but the lump sum of money that is distributed to all the conferences would be greater.
The NCAA tournament explosion hasn't killed the NIT tournament. It's still around, and you could keep the Eat-at-Joe's bowls around too. The schools like Ohio U. and Southern Miss. playing the other day to the delight of only their fans can still have their little games, and one of them can dance on the turf afterwards. A real legitimate system shouldn't be held up to protect the significance of the GMAC Bowl (more like the WGAD bowl).
10
posted on
01/09/2007 3:14:38 AM PST
by
L.N. Smithee
(Bush/Fox Border Policy in a nutshell: "Rape is inevitable. Relax and enjoy it.")
To: Chi-townChief
Time to get rid of the BCS and go back to ending the season on New Years's Day.I agree. As a Pac-10 fan there is no greater reward than the Rose Bowl. I couldn't have been more prouder when my Alma Mater went with a 7-4 record in 1978.
11
posted on
01/09/2007 3:43:35 AM PST
by
philo
To: L.N. Smithee
12
posted on
01/09/2007 3:54:14 AM PST
by
DugwayDuke
(Only children believe that they have any choice except the lesser of two evils.)
To: L.N. Smithee
I was just talking about this yesterday with our athletic director. Why not have a college tournament like they do for basketball? It can be done easy enough through December, and have the Sweet Sixteen occur during the New Year. Final Four could come in the preceeding week.
Makes sense to me.
To: Northern Yankee
It makes perfect sense - therefore it will never happen.
14
posted on
01/09/2007 4:15:19 AM PST
by
Stallone
(War and Politics: When the Enemy begins to feel pain, they change their behavior to avoid it.)
To: Stallone
To: Northern Yankee
No quick solution, but certainly all conferences should have their own championship game. It's what propelled the Gators to the national championship game and the extra week of play was obvious in the 41-14 trounce of #1 undefeated Ohio State.
16
posted on
01/09/2007 4:34:40 AM PST
by
baltoga
To: Northern Yankee
All you have to do is get rid of all the bowl games, sponsers, cities and fans. Then, you can have home and home playoff series that few will be interested in until the final game.
So....trade all these bowl games and travel and sponsership and tv for a national championship.......which will last till next year?......I don thin so!
17
posted on
01/09/2007 4:35:58 AM PST
by
cb
To: L.N. Smithee
"One of the mysteriously selected Harris Poll voters, former Washington State coach Jim Walden, actually voted the Gators #1 over Ohio State..."Can you believe that?! He ACTUALLY thought the Gators were BETTER than the Buckeyes?!!! How ridiculous is THAT!!! Heh, heh, heh...
looser.
18
posted on
01/09/2007 4:41:31 AM PST
by
Hatteras
To: L.N. Smithee
This is an off the cuff 'rant'? Wow Smithee - this is awesome. Two things really tick me off - Boise State ending up after their bowl game ranked 5th and Florida vaulting, as you said, to #2 just in time to play in the Championship game. IMO, the BCS criteria/stats did not support this move and there was no reason for Michigan to fall from #2. Now it turns out that Florida was indeed better than Ohio State and Michigan tanked - but only because they got the chance to PLAY THE GAMES! For the love of god, can we have a playoff?
To: L.N. Smithee
1 Forget Utopia
2 Unlike basketball where a Larry Bird can take an carry an Indiana State to the championship game; you need a lot of top athletes to make a powerful football team. Boise State would be 6-6,8-4 or 3-9 in the SEC.
3 It is all about money
3a Teams that put fans in the seats and push TV ratings go to bowls.
4 For my final example...I'm sure the Wake Forest vs Louisville was the lowest rated of the 5 BCS games...this game is as close to your Utopian dream you will ever see....I'll bet you didn't watch it...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson