Skip to comments.
Teen Fights Removal of Bullet in Head
AP via SFGate ^
| 12/21/6
| JUAN A. LOZANO
Posted on 12/21/2006 1:03:41 PM PST by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
12/21/2006 1:03:43 PM PST
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Mr. Olive should've been carrying a .45 ;-)
2
posted on
12/21/2006 1:06:49 PM PST
by
300magnum
(We know that if evil is not confronted, it gains in strength and audacity, and returns to strike us)
To: 300magnum
Mr. Olive should've been carrying a .45 ;-)
Or, aimed for the torso.
3
posted on
12/21/2006 1:08:54 PM PST
by
Spruce
To: SmithL
"soft, fatty tissue on his forehead"????
Huh?
4
posted on
12/21/2006 1:10:21 PM PST
by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: 300magnum
AMEN to that!
Also, they should just keep the kid in jail for the robbery until he begs them to remove the bullet, then they just retrieve it and take it to the grand jury for an attempted murder charge.
5
posted on
12/21/2006 1:13:33 PM PST
by
TheKidster
(you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
To: 300magnum
Yeah, but the gov't shouldn't be able to force someone to submit to surgery. I'd like to see the kid rot in jail if he's guilty, but this would seem like a violation of the 5th amendment, of sorts.
6
posted on
12/21/2006 1:15:55 PM PST
by
Fierce Allegiance
(Merry Christmas! SAY NO TO RUDY!)
To: patton
As seen on TV...Fat Head.
To: TheKidster
Also, they should just keep the kid in jail for the robbery until he begs them to remove the bullet, then they just retrieve it and take it to the grand jury for an attempted murder charge All the inmates would call him "Bullethead" or "Bullethead Bush"
8
posted on
12/21/2006 1:18:23 PM PST
by
300magnum
(We know that if evil is not confronted, it gains in strength and audacity, and returns to strike us)
To: patton
Huh?
My thoughts exactly... Is the guy a Klingon?
To: patton
Hollow point flattened upon impact, but failed to penetrate his skull perhaps? Odd story indeed.
10
posted on
12/21/2006 1:18:39 PM PST
by
Enosh
To: 300magnum
Mr. Olive should've been carrying a .45 ;-)
I'm ashamed to say that that was almost my first thought. "If he'd been using a .45 ACP...."
I don't see the warrant as unreasonable. They have good cause to believe the bullet is buried in his forehead and that it may be critical evidence in a trial.
11
posted on
12/21/2006 1:18:49 PM PST
by
JamesP81
(If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
To: SmithL
It seems from the article that the fact that a bullet is indeed lodged in Bush's forehead has not yet been established, which means that the title of this article is a bit misleading.
12
posted on
12/21/2006 1:20:26 PM PST
by
Sopater
(Creatio Ex Nihilo)
To: SmithL
"We know he's not a criminal," she said. "He's a good kid."
LOL!!! A bit hard headed, but a good kid who just happens to have a bullet in his head.
To: SmithL
"soft fatty tissue of his forehead"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
14
posted on
12/21/2006 1:23:11 PM PST
by
Hegemony Cricket
(When music is banned, only the bands will have music.)
To: JamesP81
I don't see the warrant as unreasonable.
In this case probably not but I sure don't want to give the govt. a precident to perform surgery on suspects in order to obtain suspected evidence. Give them that power, and it can only lead to a very bad and dark place eventually. Sometimes it's better to let a case go than set up future generations for who knows what horrors politicians will visit upon them.
15
posted on
12/21/2006 1:24:28 PM PST
by
TheKidster
(you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
To: SmithL
raises questions about patient privacy Once the formerly private citizen has entered the system, privacy, such as it is or was, is over.
16
posted on
12/21/2006 1:25:43 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(RTRA DLQS GSCW)
To: TheKidster
In this case probably not but I sure don't want to give the govt. a precident to perform surgery on suspects in order to obtain suspected evidence.
Good point. If they can do this, what's to stop them from eventually demanding that every citizen have his DNA on file?
17
posted on
12/21/2006 1:25:48 PM PST
by
JamesP81
(If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
To: RightWhale
Once the formerly private citizen has entered the system, privacy, such as it is or was, is over.
He's not been convicted of any crime. You do not deprive of rights without a conviction. This is the road to a police state.
18
posted on
12/21/2006 1:26:55 PM PST
by
JamesP81
(If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
To: SmithL
Let him keep the bullet in his head.
But I see no need to give him antibiotics if it gets infected.
19
posted on
12/21/2006 1:27:45 PM PST
by
BeHoldAPaleHorse
(Dyslexics of the world, UNTIE!)
To: JamesP81
what's to stop them That point was passed long ago. Everybody who ever got a driver's license or went to public school or walked on a public right of way or got a job working for a corporation or voted or anything else other than being born at home and staying on the property forever is public.
20
posted on
12/21/2006 1:30:19 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(RTRA DLQS GSCW)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson