Posted on 12/09/2006 3:38:57 AM PST by Mel Gibson
I guess the violence angle will be the new talking point after "Who wants to see a movie about a bunch of Mayans" didn't work.
Of course one offended by violence can always go and watch the old Yul Brynner/ George Chakiris movie KINGS OF THE SUN.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057225/
To my knowledge -- only his Psychiatrist.
Don't get me wrong, I love his movies. From Reservoir Dogs to Kill Bill I & II. Heck I must have seen both Kill Bill's 20 times each. And Pulp Fiction a 'gazillion' times.
IMO the guy is a near genius, but I don't think his elevator goes all the way up. ;-)
Strange as it may seem, there are people who simply don't think that the glorification of violence, particularly human sacrifice, is particularly healthy.
The first amendment allows Mel Gibson to produce whatever type of movie he desires. It also allows me to point out how reprehensible I think "Apocolypto" is.
The prisons are full of people that think violence is just a normal part of life.
=======================
While I agree with you, my point was that Mel is under attack at all times, though some of it was admittedly self inflicted, I have never seen Tarentino under such attacks even though the choice of genres are comparable, but one is given a pass and the other is not.
The difference? Mel is a Christian.
Those of us who call ourselves Christians should not fall for this double standard.
Or Sam Peckinpah? I think not.
Were realy dating ourselves ;)
Only those who know him.
ReaLLy that is.
I loved the scene in South Park where he puts on the Braveheart makeup and chases Stan and Kyle while wearing jockey shorts, carrying his Braveheart sword and shouting like Daffy Duck. He may be nuts, but he makes a good movie.
With all those bad reviews, it MUST be good.
A few excerpts from a Time Magazine early article...
Gibson and his rookie cowriter on Apocalypto, Farhad Safinia, were captivated by the ancient Maya, one of the hemisphere's first great civilizations, which reached its zenith about A.D. 600 in southern Mexico and northern Guatemala. The two began poring over Maya myths of creation and destruction, including the Popol Vuh, and research suggesting that ecological abuse and war-mongering were major contributors to the Maya's sudden collapse, some 500 years before Europeans arrived in the Americas.
Those apocalyptic strains haunt Apocalypto, which takes place in an opulent but decaying Maya kingdom, whose leaders insist that if the gods are not appeased by more temples and human sacrifices, the crops will die. But the writers hope that the larger themes of decline will be a wake-up call. "The parallels between the environmental imbalance and corruption of values that doomed the Maya and what's happening to our own civilization are eerie," says Safinia.
...
Gibson, who insists ideology matters less to him than stories of "penitential hardship" like his Oscar-winning Braveheart, puts it more bluntly: "The fearmongering we depict in this film reminds me a little of President Bush and his guys."
Thank you for your sensible review of the film.
I do not understand how people that have not seen the film can condemn it.
It is like the people who say they hate Rush but have never listened to his show.
The first amendment allows Mel Gibson to produce whatever type of movie he desires. It also allows me to point out how reprehensible I think "Apocolypto" is.
______________
You are absolutely correct. The same amendment permits me to suggest that it is very challenging to find a movie review credible when it is made by one who has only read other reviews.
He's not just a Christian, he is a Roman Catholic which also makes him a target from a few bigots.
How many times have us Freepers been called flakes or nuts in the media? Maybe you all should drop the psycho-analysis babble since none of you know him personally.
I had a friend who refused to take her then 12-year old to see Patriot becauee of the violence. That may or may not have been a good decision, but one can hardly study the story of the American Revolution without understanding the sacrifices made through violence, blood, gore and death. Same with Passion of the Christ and Braveheart. Bloody movies all.
The history of mankind is replete with violence, blood and gore. So we're supposed to make movies only about Mary Poppins? Mel Gibson is NOT Walt Disney.
His likely personal nuttiness should be segregated from his artistic product. So far, his sins seem to be related to an innate anti-semitism. That is not ok according to the secular Jews who rule Hollywood (or most of us, for that matter). That would be fine, except that other, 'acceptable' Hollywood moguls are outright perverts, whose rtistic output is ok by Tinsel Town.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.