QUIETLY, QUIETLY BUILDING THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION

Freedom 21 Santa Cruz ^ | October 5, 2006 | Steven Yates

[processing please hold]

Careful of the knives some FROBL are gonna be hurling at your back.

[Lorianne]

TxDOT Zeros in on TTC-35 Route

http://transtexascorridor.blogspot.com/2006/04/central-texas-is-in-perrys-crosshairs.html"

[1rudeboy]

Don't worried. The Stormfront-types have her covered.

[1rudeboy]

worried = worry

[processing please hold]

We can't be everywhere at once like FROBL can, they have a system, right?

Other than the usual elitist attitude, what do ya think about the article?

[Wallace T.]

Stormfront has no problem with internationalism, as long as it is white people in charge. The Mexican elite is as overwhelmingly European in ancestry as are those in the U.S. and Canada. White separatist groups are really the faux right, as are libertarians who oppose border controls and an effective and forceful foreign policy.

[1rudeboy]

I have a problem with children who refer to people with whom they disagree on economic matters as OBL's. To speak in a language they might understand, I'm wondering how they feel being named as Stormfront-types, that is all. Elitist, indeed.

[processing please hold]

Economic matters? Is that how you rationalize it in your head, Economic matters?

Just a whiff that it is a possibility that OUR LEADERS are talking such trash should have you up in arms.

Do you think NAFTA is a success?

[1rudeboy]

Just what is NAFTA, if not an economic matter?

[processing please hold]

I'm wondering how they feel being named as Stormfront-types, that is all. Elitist, indeed.

Didn't answer that, did I?

I'd rather be a stormfront-type defending the culture and history of this great nation, than an elitist who can't see past their monetary bottom line, with no loyalties to anything other than those of the mighty greenback.

[processing please hold]

I asked you if it was a success?

[1rudeboy]

In other words, you'd rather be a white supremacist rather than a figment of your own imagination.

[1rudeboy]

I asked you if it [NAFTA] was a success?

To our economy? Significantly, and quantifiably, yes.

[processing please hold]

Your vision of stormtrooper is different than mine. Mine, is standing up for the survival of ones country and customs. You give it negative connotations I do not.

You have the problem, not I.

[1rudeboy]

So you're not familiar with Stormfront, either. Fair enough.

[processing please hold]

Ok, maybe you should stop reading at the .gov sites.

So, you believe in globalism, as long as the price is right? I bet you like CAFTA as well.

[1rudeboy]

Do you have anything in your deck of cards that does not involve impugning my motives? Try some facts. Step up.

[processing please hold]

If nafta is such a roaring success, why are they invading our country for work? Things should be peachy there. It was supposed to generate jobs and wealth. I don't see it, do you. Is Mexico prosperous and bountiful or are they dying of thirst in our deserts to come here?

Do you have anything in your deck of cards that does not involve impugning my motives?

By either not seeing, or wanting to see what our government is up too ie: open borders, superhighway, says quiet a bit about you. The old, 'get them off the topic of open borders and the coming of the NAU, is a tactic we're used too.

So, you didn't mention the article, I already asked you what do you think of it.

Providing the keynote address at the Banff confab was our very own Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense. Rummy’s speech was entitled, “Opportunities for Security Cooperation in North America: Military-to-Military Cooperation.”

When the powerful begin reading papers on “cooperation” between the military hierarchies of three nations, are there really grounds for doubt that we are looking at compromises of U.S. sovereignty and possibly security on an unprecedented scale? Currently there is a North American Cooperative Security Act, sponsored also in 2005 and languishing in committee, but doubtless far from dead. The plan here is to integrate Mexican and Canadian security forces into the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

These two paragraphs should make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up.

[1rudeboy]

Ok, pretend NAFTA is thrown in the can tomorrow. Illegal immigration problem solved? Yes, or no?