London Stock Trader Urges Move to 'AMERO'

World Net Daily ^ | 11/28/06 | Jerome R. Corsi

[MadIvan]

The Treasury is not going to document something that doesn't exist. End of discussion.

Ivan

[William Terrell]

Of course such a thing couldn't happen in secret. But the groundwork could be laid in secret. I envy you, my friend. Trust is calming and relaxing. I don't trust any official running any kind of government. I have reasons.

As I said, we'll see what happens.

[MadIvan]

Of course such a thing couldn't happen in secret. But the groundwork could be laid in secret. I envy you, my friend. Trust is calming and relaxing. I don't trust any official running any kind of government. I have reasons.

It has nothing to do with trust - I lived in the Netherlands and Belgium during the final phases of the switchover. It was a massive undertaking - it is not something that could be done in the dead of night. Not the groundwork, not the regulatory framework, not anything near the infrastructure required. It is a huge, difficult business and the idea that somehow it could be delivered like a birthday surprise is totally crazy.

Ivan

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

mult-modal = multi-modal Geesh!

[texastoo]

You misspelled "Previs". You spelled it Previn.

[MadIvan]

The same parameters hold with Previs.

Ivan

[tmp02]

>The Treasury is not going to document something that >doesn't exist. End of discussion.
>
>Ivan


So then there are no reasonable facts that you have or exist that the Amero will(or will not) be set up as the currency in the US. Of course the Treasury won't have docs. It is not in process at the Treasury yet. Some guy in EU is pushing for it. I don't ever want the Treasure to have any information about the Amero except that it was defeated as a choice of currency.

You have just lost.

[nopardons]

I yelled because I asked you a VERY simple question and instead of getting back a simple answer, you responded with convoluted mewlings about how you weren't attacking MadIvan, how many "hits" you got back in response ( most of which had nothing at all to do with either Previs or Jeffries International as a financial firm ), and such. After several of the same kind of huey, I tried to get just a simple answer....which you still have not supplied.

Previs, though now a Senior V.P. at Jeffires, according to what was written in one place, in your link, isn't an "insider" in the Bush administration. He doesn't have a post at Treasury. He's a TRADER, who sporadically has some things he's talked about picked up by outside blogs and snippets posted. Is he a KOOK? Only a KOOK would have said what he did about a nonexistent, highly implausible new currency...the "amero".

[nopardons]

bttt

[MadIvan]

You have just lost.

You are full of excrement.

Ivan

[nopardons]

And he's basically an OIL TRADER! LOL

[tmp02]

Please forgive me if I offended you. It was wrong to be so aggressive.

[Toddsterpatriot]

You have just lost.

Says the guy who doesn't understand commodity backed currencies. LOL!

[Toddsterpatriot]

And he's basically an OIL TRADER!

Maybe he talked to Bush and Cheney at the last "Top Secret Oil Price Manipulation Meeting" that the CFR holds every year.

[calcowgirl]

Well, it looks like it's a way off and there are quite a few barriers to overcome, but there are definitely some folks rallying for a single currency, not just Robert Pastor. This piece on integration of our agricultural markets was also quite interesting and touches on establishing a monetary union. Below is a snip from the executive summary--the heart of the discussion is on pages 22 through 28.

North American Agricultural Market Integration and Its Impact on the Food and Fiber System.
By Thomas L. Vollrath, Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 784.
September 2003

(snip)

A common North American currency would increase price transparency, lower transaction costs, and promote integration of continental markets. However, the choice between retaining flexible exchange rates among the NAFTA countries or creating a monetary union between and/or among the United States, Canada, and Mexico has far-reaching ramifications that transcend the single issue of market integration. Policymakers are faced with a tradeoff in making this decision. Is the enhanced efficiency of a single currency worth surrendering the use of national monetary policy to address domestic economic shocks?

[My Favorite Headache]

There happens to be a great instrumental/experimental band called "The American Dollar"...

http://www.myspace.com/americandollarband

http://theamericandollar.info/

[nopardons]

Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw....he never was at any of those meetings; I would have remembered! :-)

[July 4th]

You have a good read on my musical tastes.

[calcowgirl]

All of your posts to me are completely unrelated to my original post to TSR who implied Previs was not associated with Jefferies. Google searches demonstrate that he is indeed associated with Jefferies, currently as a Senior Vice President, and has appeared on CNBC and is quoted in articles by Forbes, CNN, the Boston Globe, etc. That was the only point I was making. My original post stands:

>>Jefferies is real, but Steve Previs could be a kook masquerading as a board member, a mythical fart in the wind, or something else entirely.

Funny... I got over 20 hits for Steve Previs and Jeffries, at Forbes.com alone.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=+site:www.forbes.com+steve+previs

[Czar]

"Sounds kind of like NAFTA, NAFTA plus and the SPP, don't it?"

Indeed it does. Despite what has by now become a virtual mountain of evidence on the nefarious NAU activities, FR's tiny band of deniers and debunkers will continue to insist there is really nothing going on here.