Posted on 11/21/2006 5:49:44 AM PST by TommyDale
So...RW doesn't rightly handle the Word (your assessment), but his system/business model brings people in (your assessment)?
So...as people critical of the Purpose Driven model have been saying for years...the PD method is more important than the Biblical, Gospel Message.
The bigger problem (if it can get bigger than the above), in the Nazarene Church, is its embrace of other false teachers like Brian Mclaren and Leonard Sweet (and other Emergent Church/conversation gurus).
These false teachers and their teachings are so pervasive in the Church because the Church's universities are training in liberalism (a more mature world-view than just a Biblical world-view; the Bible is not inerrant; the Bible is not verbally inspired; the Bible is written, in part, by men and thus contains error; Genesis is based on near east mythology; Satan is not a real personality; Process Theology and Open Theism are viable theologies, etc., etc., and etc.).
I was given that book as a gift by a friend. I thanked her, but told her it was largely worthless. I added that the most important way to approach life was in the Bible.
She pretty secular as Christians go. The book sits, covered in dust, having never been read.
PDL certainly beats that other book.
The Bible.
Exactly.
What PDC has done to people is defined as "spiritual abuse". The next step known as "Transitioning" has also been a divisive method, and has destroyed many churches and leaderships.
I wouldn't sign the "pastor's vision" agreement/covenant that, in part, we would support shaping the Gospel to meet people's felt needs.
All of the other board members did...I walked.
There are some great Christian books out there and some Great Christian Authors but Mr Warren and his Platte River Gospel don't fit the "Great" mold at all
Interesting, seeing as how the Church of the Nazarene was founded in 1907 with the merger of three Wesleyan-Holiness denominations. The church has always been Arminian- Wesleyan - Holiness and as you know (or perhaps you don't)that is antithetical to the Calvanist doctrines of Predestination- Limited Atonement and Irresistable Grace.
So...as people critical of the Purpose Driven model have been saying for years...the PD method is more important than the Biblical, Gospel Message.
I don't know where these "critics" are coming from, but We (myself and my pastor)certainly don't consider the RW model to be even remotely as important as the Gospel message. C'mon, that's just ridiculous. It's just a tool and nothing more. Are having a Church building, Sunday school and a nursery for the little ones more important then the Gospel message!? I think all those traditional churches might be apostate, if that is the case.
Would you explain Transitioning? Or tell me where I can learn about it?
Speaking of the history of the COTN, were you aware that, in the 1920's, G. Orton Wiley was tasked with writing the church's statement on inspiration and that he wrote it, in the manner in which he did, with the purpose to leave "elbow room" for science and the like (I believe psychology was on the list along with some other items)...big mistake as it turns out!
I also have knowledge of the differences between Arminianism and Calvinism.
I don't understand why you see my conclusion as so unreasonable...
You stated that you, and your pastor, concluded that Rick Warren does not correctly handle the Word of Truth as required by 2 Tim. 2:15. This conclusion is made by the content of his materials....yet you use these materials for small groups and outreach.
So despite "horrible" hermeneutics, "lousy" preaching, being off the reservation politically (what does that say about the practical application of the Gospel message and Biblical doctrine in life) and an unlikeable message delivery..."we are using a lot of the PDL material."... because he teaches organization well, puts together a good outline/method for growing a church and getting more people committed to service in church.
Given your statements, it is not unreasonable to conclude that Warren's message isn't good but his method works for your desired purposes...pragmatism in practice.
...And since his methods work, the damage his sloppiness does to the Biblical message doesn't matter.
If you recognize the problems in his writings and messages and still use them, that is placing the method above the message.
By the way, it is also impossible to separate message and method.
Well now, here is the crux of the problem.
I never said that. You misunderstand.
"I'm sorry if I insinuated that you are a self righteous judgemental heretic."
I am shocked, shocked that you are so quick to judgement.
Yes, but the people have those 'itching ears' and don't like to hear the truth.
BTW, isn't that what got Christ crucified in the first place? Telling people who loved the lie what the truth really was?
Not much has changed, has it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.