Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I have withdrawn from an LLC and the other partners won't buy me out. NEED ADVICE
Self | 11-10-2006 | Self

Posted on 11/10/2006 7:53:47 PM PST by lmr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: RightWhale; spunkets

You're on the right track, RW. "Federal question" (civil rights, fair labor standards, etc) is one way for federal courts to obtain subject matter jurisdiction, but that typically arises in employment settings, not contract settings.

The fact that a corporation or LLC is chartered by a state is irrelevant. If they fire someone, for example, for racial reasons, the complaint can be filed in state or federal court.

Contract issues (over the operating agreement, for example) are the subject matter of state courts, except that federal courts can hear contract matters on "diversity" jurisdiction - i.e., all defendants live in a different state from all the plaintiffs. Then the federal court can hear anything (except probate and divorce cases, which are only state court jurisdiction), and the federal court uses the applicable state court's laws.

And now, since our FRiend lmr has decided on bankruptcy, he will for sure be in a federal court and all matters and challenges will be decided there.

And for what its worth, lmr, I may very well have advised a client to do that after a cost-benefit-risk analysis. And possibly with decent results. Keep in mind that when you use federal exemptions in your personal bankruptcy case, you have a "wildcard" exemption of around $10,000.00 ($20,000.00 in a joint husband and wife case) so long as you didn't use it up in your exemption for your personal residence (which is up to about $40,000 for a married couple).

Then you let the creditors go after the LLC members for the rest. And no, you won't be liable for their costs in doing so except to the extent that your assets exceed your exemptions.

As long as you didn't get into debt by fraud, of course. And most taxes and child support obligations don't get discharged.


41 posted on 11/12/2006 10:20:45 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; lmr
" I may very well have advised a client to do that after a cost-benefit-risk analysis."

That would be the purpose of the consultation with at least 2 attys. One could walk away with more than less...

42 posted on 11/12/2006 10:26:05 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

Yep, I always recommend they see someone for a second opinion. Where I wouldn't have taken the case on contingency, someone else might, changing the whole risk dynamic to the client.

Plus, there are lots of people out there smarter than me, strange as that may sound. :-)


43 posted on 11/12/2006 10:32:11 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson