Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'60 Minutes' interviews Duke lacrosse defendants (DukeLax Ping)
Durham Herald-Sun ^ | October 11, 2006 | John Stevenson

Posted on 10/11/2006 1:52:56 AM PDT by abb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800801-814 next last
To: SarahUSC

Yeah............ :>


761 posted on 10/14/2006 9:54:52 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

:>

Sounds good to me.........


762 posted on 10/14/2006 9:55:30 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

Now that's a word I know: expungement.........let me look.


763 posted on 10/14/2006 9:55:52 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

Q. Is there any way to get rid of a previous criminal conviction?

A. In very limited circumstances, North Carolina law permits the expunction of certain offenses from a person's criminal record. Except for convictions for possession of a very small amount of cocaine, which is a felony, or in the case of a pardon from the Governor, there are currently no North Carolina Statutes that permit the expunction of felony convictions.

Depending on the statute which permits the expunction, there are several requirements that must be met in order to qualify.

If an offense is dismissed, or a finding of not guilty is entered, that offense may be expunged pursuant to N.C.G.S. 15A-146. You can only request an expungement under this statute one time in your life. However, if multiple offenses are dismissed during the same term of court, or within a 12 month period, it may be possible to expunge multiple offenses in your request.

If you have been convicted of a crime or crimes, your eligibility depends on the nature of the conviction and your age at the time of the conviction. N.C.G.S. 15A-145 allows first offenders under 18 at the time of the conviction to expunge the conviction after two years, if they meet certain criteria. First offenders under the age of 21 may expunge certain alcohol infractions if they meet the statutory criteria. In very limited circumstances, N.C.G.S. § 90-96 allows individuals convicted of certain drug offenses to expunge a conviction. Only certain misdemeanor drug offenses, or the felony possession of less than one gram of cocaine, may be expunged. If you have received a pardon from the Governor, you may seek to have the record of the conviction expunged pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-149.

Except for offenses in which an individual received a pardon, only one expungement can be granted in a person’s lifetime. If you have a lengthy criminal record, you will generally not be able to expunge more than one of these offenses.

If a court does order that an offense be expunged, the offense will be deleted from the individual's criminal record and such individual will be restored to the status he/she occupied before arrest or indictment. If you are not eligible for an expungement, your only other remedies are to appeal the conviction, file a motion for appropriate relief, or seek a pardon from the Governor. You should contact a competent attorney for more information regarding expungements, appeals, or pardons.


764 posted on 10/14/2006 9:58:23 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

I have not said it is isolated. It certainly isn't. But it is not the norm.

Another problem you may be unaware of is that NC criminal procedure is very unusual in a number of important respects, which I have recounted many times on this board.


765 posted on 10/14/2006 10:00:48 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Well, since the governor appointed the dingbat DA, he sure as heck should expunge these records!


766 posted on 10/14/2006 10:02:42 PM PDT by Dukie07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
I have not said it is isolated. It certainly isn't.

We'll agree on that.

767 posted on 10/14/2006 10:06:23 PM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Yes, a directed verdict could occur if there's a trial and they're found guilty. In that case, the judge changes the jury's verdict to "not guilty." The questions are, does NC have a legal capacity for factual finding of innocence when a jury acquits (possibly, is my guess), and also does it have procedural vehicle by which the court can find, after or as part of a dismissal of charges, that the defendants are factually innocent of the crime with which they were charged (probably not, is my guess), or that there is insufficient evidence to substantiate that a crime has been committed (probably yes, is my guess). No, I haven't googled any of that.


768 posted on 10/14/2006 10:09:00 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I didn't notice him becoming full of himself, but you would have seen and/or heard a lot more from him there than I would out here. From the several times I saw him, he seemed to be a beacon of reason, comparatively speaking.


769 posted on 10/14/2006 10:10:49 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 757 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

So, nothing about expunging arrests, just convictions? People are supposed to be satisfied with a mere dismissal? A dismissal can come because the DA lost the evidence or his main witness died. Without further qualifiers, a dismissal says nothing about the guilt or innocence of the defendant.


770 posted on 10/14/2006 10:14:25 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: jennyd
Isn't she studying something related to criminal justice system? Hell, maybe one day she can be a DA.
Who would you expect more from then?
Decisions, decisions...


Mangum is most certainly NOT studying anything. She is most likely a Pell Grant scam artist. Just because the press is ranting and raving claiming she is a student does not make it so.
771 posted on 10/14/2006 10:14:34 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
The photo line-ups did not meet the state criminal justice system's protocols in any way, shape or form, and probably did not meet USSC case law precedent which requires that the photos and the presentation not be unduly suggestive or biased, which these clearly were.

Exactly, Nifong would have given her a photo array of three and made her pick three from it, if that is what it would have taken to get an indictment. He promised indictments. He had to have them prior to the primary. He was not about to let Mangum not ID someone.
772 posted on 10/14/2006 10:18:25 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Dukie07

Easley has so far escaped this entire fiasco unscathed. It is deplorable that he has not set the state AG's dogs on Liefong.

What an effing bastard Easley is.


773 posted on 10/14/2006 10:19:05 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I know it, you know it, most here know it - most except a couple, anyway.

Liefong would have cut her damn finger off and used it to point to three, if he had to.


774 posted on 10/14/2006 10:21:23 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies]

To: jennyd
Nifong claimed he never even talked to her about the case-at least to the judge.

Believing the Nifong, now that is a good strategy. It worked out well for the New and Observer didn't it?
775 posted on 10/14/2006 10:23:25 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

Well, I may just not have found it.


776 posted on 10/14/2006 10:25:02 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: Dukie07

Mike Easley? Surely you are joking. He hasn't been seen near this case and I personally have called his office no less than four times.


777 posted on 10/14/2006 10:26:46 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I have never seen one NCCU student come forward to say they actually saw her on that campus.


778 posted on 10/14/2006 10:28:03 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

There's a question. Where is she? And how much contact do Nifong and DPD have with her? Apparently her parents haven't heard from her for months and don't know where she is.


779 posted on 10/14/2006 10:35:58 PM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: SarahUSC

Who said that, her father?

I wonder why he shut up so fast.


780 posted on 10/14/2006 10:36:52 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800801-814 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson