"Why shouldn't I profit from it?"
Posted on 10/11/2006 1:52:56 AM PDT by abb
Yeah, after the beating he's taken, he's probably become gun-shy about going in front of the press with another barrel of lies.
I wonder if Whore #2 got paid for her 60M interview?
betting on the come, I suspect...
Hmmmm.....I also wonder if she's been sentenced on her violation of probation yet and, if so, did that occur before or after her 60M interview?
LOL!
The guys look so collegiate. Kim looks so...uncollegiate, if that's a word. I spot a makeover. I wonder what story she's come up with for this interview.
It's still a risk, though. Look for the prosecution to subpeona to get all film of the interview, including what doesn't air. They'll look for anything that looks like a smirk, a guilty look, or any facial expression they can freeze-frame for the jury.
Not that I would dare suggest anyone using it, but 60 Minutes' website has a comments section...
I would love to hear Collin say on national TV that he left before the dance even started and that he can prove it.....
"Why shouldn't I profit from it?"
LOL!
And what a tacky looking skank she is. That dress or top she's wearing in that photo - blech! And all those rings, bracelets and crap - what a loser!
Ed Bradley holds up Collin's receipt from the Cosmic Cantina....
Here's the Trinity Park website...
http://trinitypark.org/
The person who presides over the neighborhood association meetings is Alice Bumgarner. Other people are: Jen Minelli, Lee Ann Tilley, Lee Coggins, John Dagenhart, John Kirk, Lance Kimbrough, Emily Herbert, Pattie LeSueur, Dale Gaddis, and Stacy Murphy, Bonny Moellenbrock and Damian Makarushka, Diane Pahl, John Hodges-Copple, Pela Gereffi, Stefanie Kandzia, Al and Erika Stone, Patricia Bauer and Steve Snow, John Swansey, Eddie Zuniga, Alison Carpenter, and Eric Bishop.
It's always dangerous to judge ethnicity by names but that doesn't sound like a very diverse group. Walking past the neighborhood as I have done a time or two would tend to confirm that observation.
http://trinitypark.org/wp/index.php
Here's what Alice Bumgarner wrote in Salon shortly after the incident.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/04/04/duke_lacrosse/index.html
JOHNSON,JARRIEL,LANIER 97CR 007717 other other 99/99/2099 Some County 99999
Charges: 4458 xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Charges: 5596 xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
JOHNSON,JARRIEL,LANIER 94CR 028974 other other 99/99/2099 Some County 99999
Charges: 5450 xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
JOHNSON,JARRIEL,LANIER 98CR 102118 other other 99/99/2099 Some County 99999
Charges: 5450 xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
JOHNSON,JARRIEL,LANIER 05CR 710423 other other 99/99/2099 Some County 99999
Charges: 5450 xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I wonder why all that shows up at 123nc, but nothing shows up at the NC DOC website?
http://www.newsobserver.com/1185/story/497356.html
Defense files motion in lacrosse case
By Benjamin Niolet, Staff Writer
DURHAM — Lawyers for an indicted Duke University lacrosse player want to know what, if anything, the accuser told District Attorney Mike Nifong about her allegations of rape.
Lawyers for Dave Evans sent a letter to Nifong today saying that they are entitled to a report of anything the woman told Nifong about the facts of a March party where the woman said she was raped by Duke lacrosse players. In a recent court hearing, Nifong agreed that under state law, he would have to hand over a written report recounting anything the woman said about the incident. But Nifong told the lawyers in a hearing last month before Superior Court Judge W. Osmond Smith III, that he had no statements to hand over.
More than 2,000 pages of evidence turned over to the defense contain no record of the woman telling Nifong the facts of the case. But in a letter delivered today and filed in court, lawyers Joseph B. Cheshire V and Bradley Bannon say they believe that she has talked to Nifong.
In a motion Nifong filed Sept. 20, Nifong wrote that the woman told him that she had not taken the drug Ecstacy on the night of the party.
“The necessary implication is that, as of the date of our hearing before Judge Smith, you had spoken with [the accuser] about the facts of the case,” Cheshire and Bannon wrote in the letter.
The News & Observer generally does not identify complaining witnesses in sexual assault cases.
The lawyers also cite a story from the Durham Herald-Sun this week in which the chairman of a political action committee said that during a campaign endorsement interview Nifong said that he was the “only one that’s interviewed this victim.”
In an interview with the News & Observer, David Smith, the chairman of the Friends of Durham, said Nifong did not say much about the case when he sat for an interview with members of the group.
“What he said was he is the only person who has talked to the victim,” Smith said.
Nifong was out of the office at a conference and could not be reached today.
The account of that night by the woman will likely be Nifong’s most important piece of evidence at trial. Written reports contain several conflicting accounts that the woman told police about that night. Lawyers representing the three players say her story is false and that no rape or assault occurred.
Staff writer Benjamin Niolet can be reached at (919)956-2404 or bniolet@newsobserver.com.
I met with her and didn't speak about the case.
I never spoke to her about the case.
I'm the only one that has interviewed her about the case.
That's a good catch by Cheshire. If Nifong asked Precious whether she took ecstasy that night then he was discussing the facts of the case with her. Oops. Nifong's lies are catching up with him.
I like the part about Nifong being out of the office at a conference and unavailable for comment. He may have to go underground permanantly before this is over.
http://www.wral.com/slideshow/dukelacrosse/9897504/detail.html?qs=;s=2;w=800
Yep, he asked her in late April if she took ectstasy that night.
That would be a conversation about the case.
You see, people. This is what lying gets for you. You forget which lie to you told to whom. Now the Fong is trapped. He's lied to the Judge...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.