Mexico mega-port plan key to 'NAFTA superhighways'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | October 7, 2006

[Czar]

"For those that think that there is a secret conspiracy, all the info is publically available for anyone with an interest to know."

It's publicly available now that it has become so difficult to keep it under cover. There may or may not be a conspiracy, but there has been a pronounced reluctance on the part of those involved to talk about it--and that includes the federal government.

"Instead, most here are interested only in what someone like Corsi spoon-feeds them."

Some, perhaps, but not "most". Quite a few posters have put up documentary materials entirely independent of Corsi.

"And what Corsi spoon-feeds is crap."

You're entitled to your opinion and so are the rest of us. Personally, I find Corsi credible. As long as he remains credible, I will continue to look at what he has to say.

[B4Ranch]

I didn't mean to put the extra zero. I just looked it up for you. I was think 1500 but the truth is ........

NAFTA Text & Supplemental Agreements

Description:

The nearly 2000 pages in length document is the actual text the Agreement, reached on August 12, 1992, by U.S., Canadian and Mexican negotiators. The NAFTA Supplemental Agreements are also now available in their entirety.

[Toddsterpatriot]

I didn't mean to put the extra zero.

Okay.

[Ben Ficklin]

"Publically avaiable now"

There have been TTC threads ar FR for several years now. But somehow you didn't know anything about it til corsi came along. This means that you are poorly informed.

The article on Arizona's intentions on the Mexican port that I posted today, and everone was going to bookmark for future use was published in 05, long before Corsi came along. In fact, dip wad corsi knows nothing about it. He is not any better informed than you are.

Maybe you ought to spend a little time and research the details on CA and Mex. You might be able to get a gig at WND.

[texastoo]

Thanks for posting the number of pages of NAFTA. I had forgotten the exact number.

Could we truly ask our hard working legislator to read it?

Not now. NAFTA is being rewritten by the globalists since it was such a failure. Maybe they could use it as toilet paper.

[bitt]

thanks for your pings on this.

[potlatch]

Thanks for the ping Czar, as SA knows I have not kept up with this thread well enough to make comments. I do note the open border people here!

[Smartass]

:o)

[texastoo]

Too many Washington crapweasels have already felt the voter's wrath. And more is on the way.

Hope you are right.

[Smartass]

Awright

 

[Smartass]

"Your well reasoned and documented postings will convince him of nothing.

I know. The OBLs are only on these threads to disrupt, deceive, mislead and to ridicule.

On Bennie, he's CONCERNED, that I'm not CONCERNED about the Arizona NAFTA Corridor. And of course, why I'm CONCERNED about Texas. When in reality, I can give ahoot less about either. American sovereignty should be every true American's CONCERN, including theirs. I would hate to be in a shooting war in this country, and have these jerks at my back!

 

[Ben Ficklin]

"shooting war in this country"

Now you are returning to the conspiracy theory from a few years ago that was very, very popular with the nutjobs at FR, that the ChiCom military is secretly massed just south of the Texas border.

The new twist on the old conspiracy is the they will use the TTC to invade. As if there isn't an interstate already in place.

Your apocalyptic mindset is a wonder to behold.

[dennisw]

I didn't see this because it was PUT INTO F****** CHAT!! Thanks for posting

[dennisw]

Joke's on you, clown. This NAFTA superhighway reality sucks so you prefer to dream it away. Actually you more probably favor it. More Chicom crap coming in via Mexico and more bloated trade deficits

[Ben Ficklin]

Before the recession, there were 12,000 trucks per day crossing the TexMex border. Whether or not the volume has returned to that level, I don't know. But it is no doubt a significant number.

The US, like the whole world, is expanding its transportation capacity to accomodate the rising level of international trade.

California wants to tap into Punta Colomet, Arizona into Guaymos, West Texas into Topolobampo, and lets not omit Cardenas, for everything east of the continental divide.

Many cities are seeking inland port status for US and Mexican seaports. Dallas seeks that staus for a Texas port, 4 mexican ports, as well as the Pannama Canal.

Pannama seeks to expand their canal, Nicaragua wants to build a new canal. And Canada is secretly hoping the Northwest Passage thaws.

OTOH, there are the populists, protectionists, isolationists, and natavists being led by a modern day William Jennings Brian.

You are in lockstep with the pacific ports labor union.

[Larousse2]

I use Merriam's Webster's II.

[Larousse2]

Great response! Thanks!

I'd wager their tailors are already measuring them for Mao suits.

[dennisw]

The US, like the whole world, is expanding its transportation capacity to accomodate the rising level of international trade.

This means more Chinese crap coming in here but now via Mexico. This is not trade. This is idiocy when we run a trade deficit of 800 billion per year. It is unsustainable.
I wouldn't mind such NAFTA superhighways to Mexican seaports if our trade wasn't so out of wack

You are in lockstep with the pacific ports labor union.

Like I could give a flip
It's far better than treason against the sovereign nation of the United States of America

[Ben Ficklin]

You need to go live in a cave.

[dennisw]

You need to be spanked until it penetrates that 800 billion dollar trade deficits do matter. That America can't just party on like in a Wayne's World movie.