Documents disclose 'shadow government'

WND ^ | 9/26/06 | unknown (Jerry Corsi)

[Paul Ross]

Instead of those nicely curvaceous screen villains...you're getting this....

[Paul Ross]

FOIA. Freedom of Information Act releases. Nothing else needs to be said. You RINO Globalists are caught out.

[Paul Ross]

BUMP. Especially the bash on John Cornyn. These guys are sinister. The Constitution is is as good as toast in their hands.

[WatchingInAmazement]

I agree.

[MissAmericanPie]

There will be many people who will call this tin foil hat stuff and they would be wrong. Bush himself has made no secret of his intentions, nor has Fox.

They have both been very open with their double speak that the media carefully avoids demanding clarification of.

Bush, "I would like to see a Free Trade Zone from the North of Canada to the tip of Cape Horn."

Fox, "The United States, Canada, and Mexico will unite under one Trade Umbrella with U.S. wages dropping to meet Mexico's rising wages. The rest of S. America will join later".

So there has been no secret here, they have been very much in our face with all their statements but the details and exact meaning regarding what they are talking about and it's ultimate effect on our remaining a nation state are carefully excluded and ignored by the press.

One has only to look at the insanity of suffering an attack such as happen on 9-11 and the complete refusal to not only protect our borders but to build a super highway from Mexico to Canada via Texas is to know that the fish is stinking in the kitchen.

There has only been a few token deportations and talk of a fence amounting to a couple of strands of barbed wire in an attempt to throw a bone to the betrayed American citizen before the November elections. The Demonrats are no better, they have the same agenda. And we deserve every bit of it.

[beyond the sea]

Right.

[Paul Ross]

They have both been very open with their double speak that the media carefully avoids demanding clarification of.

Bush, "I would like to see a Free Trade Zone from the North of Canada to the tip of Cape Horn."
Fox, "The United States, Canada, and Mexico will unite under one Trade Umbrella with U.S. wages dropping to meet Mexico's rising wages. The rest of S. America will join later".

So there has been no secret here, they have been very much in our face with all their statements but the details and exact meaning regarding what they are talking about and it's ultimate effect on our remaining a nation state are carefully excluded and ignored by the press.

BUMP! It is right in the face of every single idiot who starts out trying to bash the threat as tinfoil or a black helicopter moment. They have some 'splainin to do with Fox's CLEAR, UNEQUIVOCAL, AGENDA...and W never, ever, once contradicting him or that agenda. And notice how they never come to grips with the SPP secrecy, or the actual deviations from proper consitutional order...with the Senate being consulted over everything [not that this passel of rascals would actually oppose anything anyways]

[Paul Ross]

The promoters of the NAU even spelled out their basic approach, incrememntalism from the bottom up:

Richard Gardner was an original member of the Trilateral Commission, and one of the prominent architects of the New International Economic Order. In 1974, his article "The Hard Road to World Order" appeared in Foreign Affairs magazine, published by the Council on Foreign Relations. With obvious disdain for anyone holding nationalistic political views, Gardner proclaimed,

"In short, the 'house of world order' would have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."1 [emphasis added]

In Gardner's view, using treaties and trade agreements (such as General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs or GATT) would bind and supercede constitutional law piece by piece, which is exactly what has happened. In addition, Gardner highly esteemed the role of the United Nations as a third-party legal body that could be used to erode the national sovereignty of individual nations.

Gardner concluded that "the case-by-case approach can produce some remarkable concessions of 'sovereignty' that could not be achieved on an across-the-board basis"2

Thus, the end result of such a process is that the U.S. would eventually capitulate its sovereignty to the newly proposed world order.

__________________________

Footnotes:

1. Gardner, Richard, The Hard Road to World Order, (Foreign Affairs, 1974) p. 558
2. ibid, p. 563