Posted on 08/29/2006 1:39:25 PM PDT by abb
The jury is still out on whether or not Nifong is in his right mind.
And, as I said in my post that you replied to, he might have done it to show that Mangum wasn't under the influence of drugs that night as was being speculated about by the defense. That's a guess - I didn't state it was fact. none of us has any way to know for sure.
The fact remains that Nifong did indeed take the hair sample and submit it for testing. Only Nifong knows why he did it. It was too late for a blood or urine sample, so hair was all that he had left.
Quite true.
LOL!!!!
mark
Such as: "The bloggers and the press know about the connections between some of us and the sex industry! What are we gonna do?"
'Probe' in a case like this could mean just about anything. LOL!
With the testimony of Dec 15, I believe that this witness intimidation needs to be remembered.
From the US Attorney General:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1754981/posts
Latest on Lab testimony:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1753040/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.