Skip to comments.
Fox News
Fox News
| 8/28/06
| Security Mom
Posted on 08/28/2006 9:00:41 AM PDT by mgbgun2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: mware
I am too. Just, really upset my sense of fair and balanced. On the whole I like Fox News, just hate to see the political correctness foot ease it's way in the door!!
41
posted on
08/28/2006 9:42:28 AM PDT
by
mgbgun2
To: mgbgun2
Their press conference and photo-op with the Pals was sickening, and WITHOUT a gun to their heads.
I am sure that Fox and their cohorts in the MSM will soon be AGAIN reporting:
"Did US troops commit ATROCITIES?"
"Is the USA is losing in Iraq?"
"Is George W Bush is dangerous, stupid, corrupt, incurious, a liar, or an idiot?"
BUT;
The Pals are kind and beautiful and need their wonderful story told.
Their "kidnappers" are forgotten, never spoken about in anger, or defiance, or threats of arrest.
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
OK, what was CNN's excuse? CNN wasn't held at gun point ..
43
posted on
08/28/2006 9:43:36 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: martin_fierro

What's eternal about it? The cd's going for .99 on ebay.
44
posted on
08/28/2006 9:44:17 AM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Where did I leave my matches?)
To: roses of sharon
He wasn't talking about the kidnappers
45
posted on
08/28/2006 9:45:18 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: wideawake
If I were held at gunpoint by a Muslim lunatic he would get the exact same response from me. Fine .. but if you didn't .. I still would not hold you in judgment
46
posted on
08/28/2006 9:48:46 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Didn't see that report, sorry. Hate to think of Fox being in the same category as "Communist News Network."
47
posted on
08/28/2006 9:50:43 AM PDT
by
mgbgun2
To: shekkian
I'm really disappointed. They gave up their souls to save their lives.Stay disappointed. They participated in a forced farce. I'll be their families are steaming mad and disppointed like you.
48
posted on
08/28/2006 9:53:06 AM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: socal_parrot
Thanks, daughter just honorably discharged from Air Force (intelligence). Have deep feelings about this kind of stuff!
49
posted on
08/28/2006 9:59:16 AM PDT
by
mgbgun2
To: Mo1
These guys are known throughout the world - the world is watching and young people especially are watching.
We are engaged in a long struggle - their weakness in the face of Muslim aggression will embolden new hostage takers.
Their actions must be evaluated - they cannot be ignored.
50
posted on
08/28/2006 10:00:42 AM PDT
by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: wideawake
Their actions must be evaluated - they cannot be ignored. I never said we should ignore what happen
What I said was ... I will not hold them in judgment
51
posted on
08/28/2006 10:03:06 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: Mo1
I never said we should ignore what happenYou definitely did not say that.
What I said was ... I will not hold them in judgment
As I said, their actions have to be evaluated. If the result of that evaluation is unfavorable, it is unfavorable. Abandoning one's self-respect in the face of violent threats from savages is strategically unwise precisely because it is cowardly.
52
posted on
08/28/2006 10:06:15 AM PDT
by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: wideawake
I agree. Our inclusiveness and inability to speak the harsh truth can only be viewed as weakness to a people who send their children to their death in order to further their cause of destroying us!
53
posted on
08/28/2006 10:09:33 AM PDT
by
mgbgun2
To: mgbgun2
Point is, CNN (reference Jordan Eason) is effectively an Islamofacist outlet, sans coherence.
54
posted on
08/28/2006 10:13:07 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
To: Mo1
Well I should hope not! LOL
To: Xenalyte
All suggestions welcome, oh, allusive one!!!
56
posted on
08/28/2006 11:13:51 AM PDT
by
mgbgun2
To: mgbgun2
Well, a verb would be a good start. You could even work yourself up to a whole sentence, if you get up some steam. ;)
(I'm just playin' with you. I didn't realize you were a new poster, or I'd not have said anything. And it's a great thread.)
57
posted on
08/28/2006 11:20:42 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(No one will be sitting in sackcloth and ashes wailing, "Oh, if only we had listened to Art Bell!"))
To: mgbgun2
I went back to the thread, and this caught my eye:
Our inclusiveness and inability to speak the harsh truth can only be viewed as weakness to a people who send their children to their death in order to further their cause of destroying us!
And I thought it was good enough to repeat, so I did. Hear, hear!
58
posted on
08/28/2006 11:21:41 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(No one will be sitting in sackcloth and ashes wailing, "Oh, if only we had listened to Art Bell!"))
To: Mo1; wideawake
Fine .. but if you didn't .. I still would not hold you in judgmentWith all due respect, I don't think it's your judgement that wideawake is worried about.
59
posted on
08/28/2006 11:23:46 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(I've had it with these &%#@* jihadis on these &%#@* planes!)
To: mgbgun2
I believe there was minimal coverage leading up to their release to elude Islam into thinking that they were not getting coverage. Most of the kidnappings are done strictly so a point can be made, and if no-one is covering the story, or making a huge point out of it, their MO was shot. After their release, their was more coverage to find out EXACTLY what was going on. It was their first public appearance and their was more emphasis on what they had to say. I agree that Fox should have clarified why there was minimal coverage after the fact. Fox has always been fair and balanced, and I would hate for them to lose that title for one mishap, they need to watch carefully how they handle these issues. Nice Post!
60
posted on
08/28/2006 11:33:30 AM PDT
by
af_republican
(Anti "Anti-Crowd")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson