Posted on 07/29/2006 2:08:53 PM PDT by lirium
Because we're Bushbots, I guess. Party loyalists. Trileralists. Or something like that. We just don't have the TRUTH, you know! Damn those inconvenient facts and eyewitnesses!
You have yet to present anything that shows either how the charges could have survived the impact, been placed after the impact, or been placed before the impact without building mainteneance not noticing.
In other words, your side is full of sh**.
Popular Mechanics had more structural engineers examine this; you know - real people - not just people who claim to have expertise.
I'm buying more pharmaceutical stock tomorrow morning; these people clearly need anti-psychotic medicine.
So who pre-positioned the cutter charges and why? Was this a Bush operation in order to take out Afghanistan and Iraq, with team Bush knowing in advance about the airplane attack or what? We might was well move right down to the bottom line of the thesis. Foreplay is fun, but males tend to get impatient after awhile.
You see, they don't answer who. Come to think of it, they don't answer how, either.
Bump
Home heating oil has about the same BTU as jet fuel. 10,000 gallons of it, without additional fuel will cause structural steel to fail. Here's your proof. This is steel with very little load on it. Put a massive load on it and cut a few of them for good measure.
Funny, they don't have an answer for that one, do they?
The silence is deafening.
I wish I'd had the tinfoil hat concession at this event.
ROFL.
The same thing happened on Route 80 in NJ in June 22 of 2001. I remembered that when I started hearing this "fire wasn't hot enough to melt steel" garbage these nutters put out. When this one happened I captured screen shots of the live coverage. Oh, I was wrong, it was 12000 gallons, about the same as the planes that hit the towers
"Fiery crash shuts down I-95"
On March 25, 2004, a traffic accident in Bridgeport reminded everyone how critical I-95 is to the area's transportation network. A tanker truck carrying 12,000 gallons of fuel oil collided with another vehicle and caught fire. The resulting blaze was hot enough to melt steel support beams on the southbound side of the newly constructed bridge over Howard Avenue....snip... Link Here
And without the kinetic energy of the impact. And all the combustables in the offices.
Your grammar skills make me wince.
Their entire theory shot down by a traffic accident.
ROFL. I was going to check back to see if there was a response.
Remember, this happened twice. One on Interstate 80, June 2001, one on Interstate 95, March 2004.
I keep checking back as well. I've never heard any "explanation" why a bridge melting is possible and demonstrable and in a building it's not possible. If a steel beam can do this, who in their right mind thinks a steel truss wouldn't nor the structural steel of the building. Specially with all the extra combustables in the office and the wind tunnel effect.
And the structural damage from the kinetic energy of a jetliner going over 500 mph.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.