Don't know if this is where this should be posted. If not, Mods will move it.
While this is a sad commentary on an (I hope isloated) matter involving an "abuse" (pun intended) of judicial ethics, it is just too humorous to share.
With all sad and unsettling news of late, a little levity is in order.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: seasoned traditionalist
What case was the good judge trying when he committed his transgression? A stock fraud case of pump and dump?
To: seasoned traditionalist
28 posted on
06/29/2006 1:07:01 PM PDT by
posterchild
(Fresh out of compassion. How about some limited government?)
To: seasoned traditionalist
In his bid for the supreme court he thought is was an erection, not election.
To: seasoned traditionalist
Sh-Sh.
To: martin_fierro
41 posted on
06/29/2006 7:41:27 PM PDT by
rzeznikj at stout
(ASCII and ye shall receive... (Computers 3:14))
To: seasoned traditionalist
"I still use those," Dakil testified.
Brewster paused.
"Not you, personally?" he asked.
"No," Dakil responded as jurors laughed. "I recommend those as a urologist."
I don't care who you are, that's funny right there..
46 posted on
07/01/2006 2:56:58 AM PDT by
csvset
("It was like the hand of G_d slapping down and smashing everything." ~ JDAM strikes Taliban)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson