Skip to comments.
Bush Administration Erases U.S. Borders With Mexico and Canada
HumanEventsOnline ^
| 06/28/2006
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 06/29/2006 6:06:13 AM PDT by NapkinUser
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-208 last
To: NapkinUser
>>What the SPP June 2005 Report to Leaders documents is the knitting together of a new regional super-government, the North American Union, being accomplished in executive branch closed committees whose membership remain unnamed. The United States has never experienced a coup detat, let alone a coup detat pulled off by the executive branch under cover of working groups.<<
Even when the source is normally rational - there is no point in us devoting a lot of time to insane conspiracy theories - except maybe late at night on the weekends when a bunch of people are drunk... :)
But this article is so far from reasonable or rational....
201
posted on
07/06/2006 10:09:45 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(Unity of freedom has never relied upon uniformity of opinion.)
To: Mel Gibson; 1rudeboy
First of all, there is a shortage of 20,000 truck drivers (this fact is not debateable) and the need for drivers is very likely to increase into the future.I'll bet you'd cry if we shut down trade with Mexico and 20,000 American drivers lost their jobs. But at least those nasty foreigners wouldn't be driving their trucks here.
202
posted on
07/06/2006 1:48:09 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
I used to sell a steel building product that was delivered (primarily) on 48' flatbeds. Turns out that a lot of flatbed haulers are farmers on the side. I think it was because the skills/equipment were synergistic, but that's another story. Right about this time next month, the supply of available flatbeds/haulers begins to dry up (at least in the Midwest), and it slowly gets worse until the problem peaks in late August to mid-September.
It's because the drivers are home busy bringing in the harvest.
Sadly enough, this period also almost perfectly coincides with the busiest part of construction season, as everybody tries to get their frames/walls up before bad weather hits. The perfect ulcer storm.
To: 1rudeboy
As long as those are good old American drivers.....
204
posted on
07/06/2006 4:12:02 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: OB1kNOb
I see the usual free-traitor chihuahua brigade has already arrived to harass and bite at everyone's ankles that wants to have a reasonable discourse on this subject. If you ignore their responses, watch and they'll start flinging insults between themselves. They want to harass and squelch any such discussion and debate about the subject, whether it's a valid, serious concern or not. They don't even want the issue discussed for fear it may impact their finances adversely. Their primary allegiance lies with the almighty dollar. This kind would do business with Iran, Syria, and North Korea if they thought there was a dollar profit to be gained.Bump!
Rant of the week!
205
posted on
07/07/2006 2:40:46 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: 1rudeboy
Thanks for the cite. There was no particular hurry, I had a lot of boating and other recreating to do in Lake McDonald in Glacier the last week.
I have read that opinion, it is in error.I agree with Lawrence Tribe's constitutional construct. Basically, the author of the ruling over-reaches for the commerce clause and essentially invents a whole new penumbra (where have we heard that before? H'mmmm?) with the Necessary and Proper Clause and the "president's foreign relations powers." Doesn't fly, McGee. Otherwise, it's a fair and balanced opinion. He obviously felt the weight of ruling against the machine which was already in motion, and just chickened out. And the Appellate Courts likewise. E.g., where he observes:
While NAFTA is likely a treaty, it may not be a "treaty," as contemplated by the Treaty Clause.(346) Nevertheless, I will assume that it is such. In any event, this suggestion adds weight to the argument that the Commerce Clause, coupled with the Necessary and Proper Clause and the President's foreign relations powers, provides sufficient authority for the completion of NAFTA, exclusive or not.
206
posted on
07/07/2006 3:29:07 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Paul Ross
Glacier National Park is proof God exists. I envy you.
To: 1rudeboy
Glacier National Park is proof God exists.Agreed...
Lake McDonald
Bowman Lake
208
posted on
07/08/2006 1:03:02 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-208 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson