Posted on 06/22/2006 2:23:47 AM PDT by abb
Fox's In the Lineup Saturday Night w/ Kimberly Guilfoyle:
3 guests ( 2 are Georgia Goslee and Don Clark/ black former FBI agent)
Georgia and Don Clark - no surprise here - both don't see any problems with the AV's descriptions not matching Colin Finnerty. Don Clark disregarded the Polygraph saying they only as valid as the questions posed. Hey Don, do you think the Polygraphere would know more about that than you.
Kimberly Guilfoyle loads the show with people that will the defend the AV. The show is short on facts and reasoning because AV supporters can't provide a reasonable decision to support her - based on facts or evidence.
Levitt does recognize that all numbers are equally likely. The comments pointed out that you could do what he does based on the first seven out of 46, the last seven out of 46, the middle seven of 46, numbers 14-21 of 46. Similarly it could have been the first 12 or last 12 etc with a slightly higher probability.
Woody Vann seemed to think Meeks had a decent chance of winning. That's quite a few signatures to get on short notice.
The percentage that Meeks ends up with might serve as a guide to the percentage of the jury pool which is not looking to convict the players.
Tee hee hee. That's pretty funny. Did you ever "out" yourself? I wouldn't be surprised if they'd have tossed you off the bus and made you walk home.
Exactly. And the Reps generally have higher participation rates.
Some frat or sorority could just as easily have been the victim of this prosecution. The Greek system might also be a ready-made organization to get out the votes.
A couple of editorials this morning...
Put lacrosse case on a faster track
http://www.herald-sun.com/opinion/hsedits/56-748994.html
Let's talk sports
http://www.newsobserver.com/559/story/456646.html
If Cheek is certified to run, I would now hope that trial not begin until after the start of the new year (Cheek takes office 1 Jan.?) in the presumption that Cheek would have the common sense to drop the charges.
Friday on Hannity's radio show, MK said the defense WILL NOT file a motion to dismiss. That tells me they want it to go to trial and quickly. It could be everything has progressed to the point that the defense is now on the offense and is trying to KEEP Nifong from turning loose. Keep him lashed to the mast of the Titanic, so to speak.
What say you to this theory? Or did I just get up too early and doing too much thinking, lol?
There is a way for their names to be cleared, I think. If Crystial were to go in front of TV cameras and say she made it all up to keep from being committed to drug rehab, etc. And then she admits to the collusion among the DA, police, AA leaders, etc...
Whoever that commenter was quoted my words exactly in post 1822 on this thread. I wouldn't mind, except that I was wrong. There doesn't seem to be a requirement that the student live in Durham for 30 days before registering to vote. The voter reg. form can be downloaded from the link below and must be:
* Postmarked at least 25 days before the election - Nov. 7.
* Delivered to the local board of elections by 5:00 on the 25th day before the election.
http://www.co.durham.nc.us/departments/cannonball.cfm?ID=2&deptPage=Voter_Registration.cfm
Duke students voting info: http://www.lib.duke.edu/reference/virtual/voting.html#eligibility
I agree completely that it is most important that those you mentioned start the process. Even if all parties involved change the stories there will still be some that never accept that the young men are innocent.
The scary part of this whole thing is the thought that these young men might actually have to go to trial with a jury that is in no way representative of their peers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.