Posted on 06/19/2006 7:37:30 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
you want a 3rd world country on our border?
I don't. Hell if Mexico wasn't such a dump MAYBE some of the illegals wouldn't be coming here in droves.
And Canada isn't a 3rd world country last time I checked.
Always.
Until Corsi publishes the next book outlining this and then moves onto his next "controversy", he will continue to hammer this for book profits.
We live on a continent whose three countries possess the assets to make it the strongest, most prosperous and self-sufficient area on Earth. Within the borders of this North American continent are the food, resources, technology and undeveloped territory which, properly managed, could dramatically improve the quality of life of all its inhabitants.xIt is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States--a North American accord--would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them--strong as they are--could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation. In fact, the key to our own future security may lie in both Mexico and Canada becoming much stronger countries than they are today.
Why that evil greedy entrepreneur. How dare he!!
It is to the tin foil hat brigade.
Easy there, cowboy. You just called Prof. Corsi a free-trader. LOL
Actually McDonald's owns the fast food chain I prefer -- Chipotle's.
One of my kids commented that they always have Mexicans working the kitchen, heating the tortillas and rolling the burritos, but that you never see a Mexican working the register. Brutal.
I did get my wife and I burritos on May 1, and sure enough the store was like movies from the Twenties -- black and white only!
I'm glad you live near Wright-Pat instead of me. I'm always worried that flying saucer they supposedly have underground there might come out one night.
Yeah, he gets condemned roundly for it.
Not by the folks on this thread who usually condemn others for the same.
It was not some huge conspiracy that was covered up though. It was all done very publicly, and the citizens voted on it.
Little hard to swallow this all happening 'under wraps' just because someone claims that it is so.
"-- in Pursuance thereof --" is the operative phrase.
Any law or treaty that was repugnant to our Constitutions principles would be null & void. [see Marbury]
Eastbound wrote:
It's really that simple, but difficult for most to absorb. We have to be a nation of laws and not men, else we'll fail. But those laws have to be, as you point out, in pursuance to the Bill of Rights/Constitution, for the Constitution constructs the legal mechanism and contract for our elected officials to adhere to, to prevent infringement of both enumerated and non-enumerated rights of the individual.
Our failure to hold those elected officials to their constitutional oaths is the real problem, as I see it. It's a failure of our political 'two party' system. And FR is a perfect example of why that system is not working to restore our Constitution.
Even without the Second Amendment, the right to self-defense is so basic that only a tyrant would suppose it was not an non-enumerated right.
Many here think that States can ignore our RKBA's. Figure that.
So I am an entrepreneur too. Does that make me automatically in favor of the thousands of pages of micromanaged trade in NAFTA?
No, it makes you an entrepeneur that has never read NAFTA. Thousands of pages, indeed.
It's either Mondale, Gore or Kerry. No doubt a Grandmaster of the CFR!
It just seems like thousands when really only a few words would do the job (if that was the intention of course).
Just don't tell Corsi. He'll freak.
Well, whatever President uttered THOSE statements is obviously a President that no TRUE Conservative could ever support!
Instead of supporting candidates like that, vote third party or independent!
I admit that I failed, and did note vote for John Anderson. What can anyone expect from a Ron-bot?
Reagan-quoting "Marxist/Soviet propaganda and debating tactics" types are the worst.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.