Posted on 06/18/2006 2:24:55 AM PDT by Al Simmons
Translation: "I think she's cute." (Sorry but you asked for that one...)
Have read every post. Maybe I missed it somehow.
Therefore I will proclaim you are an immature little name caller, because the use of basic logic, you have called any women who doesn't live up to YOUR values a WHORE.
I will now place large sums of money that YOU believe any women who gets raped "deserved it".
You have here a series of replies on this thread given to any shrink all the ammo they would need to acccurately proclaim you can not deal with "Competition"...your buddies who are whoremongers you can't (couldn't) compete with and you can't or aren't capable of competing with women who would only "laugh in your general" direction. Therefore your little world of competion must be very boring and that is why you start your day with a thread like this...to stir up some bullsh;t to entertain yourself.
Darwin? I'm making a Darwinist attack on this thread? -- Bizarre accusation.
Go ahead and bring over all the Darwinists for a yelpfest, tpaine.
Who are they? -- And why do you imagine I've had "yelpfests" with them?
Keep proving Ann Coulter's thesis in real time.
What is Ann's thesis? I haven't read it, or attacked it, -- as you well know.
You're right Al. This isn't about Coulter's politics. This is about the Darwinist religion.
Rave on.. I am not associated with any "Darwinist religion".
Is 'Catastrophic' not descriptive enough?
She's cute but that sort of thing doesn't move me a great deal. I have to be in a deeply emotional relationship with a woman before her looks do a lot for me sexually. One of my quirks, I guess.
On reflection, I conclude that Coulter engages in a totally feminine style of attack -- Like a she-bear protecting her cubs.
hillary does the same thing, only she's much more shrill.
Garofolo does the same thing, but without any smile.
When Rosie O'Donnell goes on the attack, she doesn't even look human. {My opinion}
Coulter's flip of the hair, twinkling eyes, bright smile, along with her insightful mind, and quick, sharp wit -- Totally feminine, and deserving of our support. We're lucky to have her on our side.
Seriously, can you imagine having an argument - much less winning one - with Ann Coulter - about ANYTHING
Yes :-)
Ahhhhhhh,
But judgment can have temporary lapses or chronic blind spots, as I'm sure you're aware.
I see Ann's seeming lapses in judgment to be RELATIVELY minor in terms of her public pronouncements . . . and not of the chronically pathological variety.
Just my flawed armchair judgment, of course.
*HHOOOOOOOWWWLLL*
I thought there might be some PC feminazi type who would make this point!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
No my dear fellow, I used that term because it is a time-worn oldfashioned term, and because it is ACCURATE.
Just as Theodore Roosevelt's observation (in 1916) that the effect of the application of the doctrine of "free love" would in effect make every woman into a WHORE.
As with most things, he was right.
A woman who sleeps around is indeed acting like a WHORE (and not getting paid for it which might strike some as stupid to boot).
A man who chases women to bed them and move on is a WHOREMONGER and scum of the earth.
Would it be better if I called him a PIMP?
The truth is the truth. And no amount of immorality-norming can change that.
P.S. Struck a bit close to home with you, did I?
P.P.S. I have stated for at least 20 years that a conviction for rape should bring with it AN AUTOMATIC DEATH PENALTY. So stick that in your hat and smoke it.
Excellent points, imho.
And, with that, I need to get whatever I can of the last half of my sleep jump.
Church time will be here quite early enough.
Cheers, Blessings, Thanks one and all. Interesting . . . dialogues.
You have zip proof of that. Its just a way of rationalizing something that doesn't fit into natural selection. As homosexuality exists in animals, you are choosing to simply ignore certain evidence and run with an assertion. This is my point about Darwinists. Instead of being objective, they tend to knee jerk towards defending their rice bowl. Strikes me as bad scientific approach, and as you put it, "intellectual laziness".
Rest assured, Tom, that until you learn how to type in < p > no one will succeed in making any sense of your home page...just a friendly suggestion....
My 'home page' is not there to entertain you Al. I use it as an ammo dump.
a. Help Ann sell more books, and
b. Get folks to look at my (newly revised) homepage.
Yes, I am shameless.
But I also have a warped sense of humor (which does NOT mean that I didn't mean everything that I posted on this thread, because I did. Confused yet?)
Now I must get some sleep, so Good Morning to y'all.
;.)
Jesus also tended to think that those who were erring by obeying the letter of the law and not the spirit of it were erring by not being strict enough with themselves. You would rather we cut ourselves more slack. Jesus said hatred in one's heart is murder.
You get down to petty name calling to make you points.
That is supposed to be "un-lady like" but you are actively enging in it, because you have a sack...note I believe you have no balls just a shriveled sack...
Calling me a PC feminazi type, fine I can live with that, and in fact coming from you I consider it a compliment
Calling women's private behavior WHORES
Calling WHORES even more stupid if they don't collect money according to you
The real issue here is you are a woman hater...and you have an issue over controlling women's behavior...might explain why you had to have a woman arrested for threatening your precious fluids...I would LOVE to meet this woman now...bet we would have a lot to talk about!
So it is pretty pathetic...we had to get this many posts to figure out you are a woman hating troll using the "thread" to pretend you are going to analyze something you hate anyway, just women in general and you use a Conservative icon to start your rant on.
Not only do you hate Ann Coulter and her success...you just hate women who aren't willing to proclaim you are right or god's gift.
I too laugh in you general direction ...
Who doesn't? ;-)
Curious--what venom are you supposed to be anti- to?
LOL humby...we all KNOW you God's gift! Anything else is merely sloppy seconds!
You have utterly failed! I will not buy Ann Coulter's book, neither have I looked at your homepage! :-D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.