Skip to comments.
9-year-old attacked, bitten by pit bull in Ft Knox's Morand Manor
15 Jun 06
| SPC. IAN BOUDREAU /Turret staff writer
Posted on 06/15/2006 6:38:54 PM PDT by SLB
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Too bad the military are not allowed to be armed while off duty in their housing areas. That should have been a double tap to the head or a load of #4s or 5s from about ten feet.
1
posted on
06/15/2006 6:38:59 PM PDT
by
SLB
To: Squantos; Lion Den Dan; sit-rep
The dogs have a place, but that place is not where they are liable to get out and create this type of havoc.
2
posted on
06/15/2006 6:42:28 PM PDT
by
SLB
(Wyoming's Alan Simpson on the Washington press - "all you get is controversy, crap and confusion")
To: SLB
Another reason why these animals need to be eradicated. Sorry for any owners of pit bulls but these animals are bred to kill.
If nothing else, take every single one of them to Iraq and set them loose on the Al Kuckos over there. That'll be one way to put them to good use.
3
posted on
06/15/2006 6:44:22 PM PDT
by
pctech
To: pctech
I hear the moose-limbs just soooo love dogs.
4
posted on
06/15/2006 6:45:32 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: SLB
My dogs WILL bite and I have a sign that says so at the gate. They're just Jack Russells so people simply laugh it off. You would be amazed at how many people walk in without ringing the bell and get bitten.
5
posted on
06/15/2006 6:49:33 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(never a mini gun handy when you need one)
To: SLB
Oh no....here comes the " It's the training and owners, its not my gentle pit bull."
Many dog breeds may bite...but pitt bulls are especially dangerous once they attack. Once they start charging people with criminal violations and jailing them for not being responsible, that will take care of this. No doubt the idiots that own this type of breed have no money so you can't sue them.
Disgusting.
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
No doubt the idiots that own this type of breed have no money so you can't sue them. I am not sure what the liability in quarters would be. When we lived in "housing" we did not have insurance as the government would reimburse us as long as we were not at fault in a loss. I doubt if these folks have any type of liability insurance so collecting would be iffy at best.
7
posted on
06/15/2006 6:52:31 PM PDT
by
SLB
(Wyoming's Alan Simpson on the Washington press - "all you get is controversy, crap and confusion")
To: pctech
Yeah, they were bred to kill other dogs, not people. And no pit bull is that big at six months, or any other time in its life. Sounds to me like someone sold these idiots a "fad" dog, or a bluff dog, calling it a pit bull, and the owners bought it because they didn't bother to learn about the breed standard. Perhaps that is why so many of these man biters are HUGE. They're overpriced, badly bred mutts with the pit bull name. It's a shame because dogs like mine (43 pounds and extremely human friendly, just as the standard states)are getting a bad name because of these dopes and their thousand dollar "rare" pits.
8
posted on
06/15/2006 6:56:11 PM PDT
by
solosmoke
To: SLB
I might be wrong, but I believe that pit bulls were forbidden on the bases we lived on. But we were Navy
9
posted on
06/15/2006 7:02:24 PM PDT
by
Shimmer128
(i thought that I was supposed to accomplish something before I was allowed to be proud of myself.)
To: xcamel
I know what the person in the article is talking about in regards to it being a problem with the owners and not the breeds.
I live accross the street from some boobs who would let their dog roam the neighborhood unsupervised. It would chase my cat(it has a license), crap on my lawn as well as other neighbors lawns, dig holes on my property, and basically just run around my yard like it was its own yard which would piss me off to no extent!
I finally had a confrontation with the owner and was basically told that we(neighbors) were blowing it out of proportion, that her dog should be allowed to roam my yard because my cat had killed a bird on her lawn, and that she saw no difference between a cat roaming the neighborhood and a dog roaming the neighborhood.
You can kind of get the calibur of people I am dealing with here. You know, low lifes.
I can see how this kind of stuff happens in a neighborhood, and it is mainly because of the derelict owners. The bitch(no pun intended) never walks the dog and just basically locks it up in the back yard(torture for a dog) and wonders why it breaks free. Sometimes they even just open the door and let it out.
Its a damn disgrace!
To: SLB
Goldfinger is playing on AMC.
11
posted on
06/15/2006 7:03:13 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Mrs. Frogjerk
That just makes me mad when I read your post. I have a pupster and she is like my child. I know everyone doesn't feel that way about their doggie, but they should at least be responsible.
To: SLB
13
posted on
06/15/2006 7:22:30 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
To: Mrs. Frogjerk
I finally had a confrontation with the owner and was basically told that we(neighbors) were blowing it out of proportion, that her dog should be allowed to roam my yard because my cat had killed a bird on her lawn, and that she saw no difference between a cat roaming the neighborhood and a dog roaming the neighborhood. I don't think cats should be allowed to roam the neighborhood either. If you're going to have a cat in a neighborhood, get a litterbox and keep it inside.
Our neighbor's cats scratched our cars when they climbed on them, pooped in the flowerbeds, killed birds at our birdfeeders and were generally a nuisance, but our neighbor, like you, didn't see a problem.
14
posted on
06/15/2006 7:29:17 PM PDT
by
Amelia
(Education exists to overcome ignorance, not validate it.)
To: SLB
I'm an arm-chair dog trainer out of necessity: I have a Chow Chow. The part about earning the AKC title of Canine Good Citizen is really quite unbelieveable, and this may cause many people to rethink the "hows and whys" of this breed's behavior. For those of you that are interested, for a dog to earn the AKC Canine Good Citizen certificate, it must:
1. Accept a friendly stranger. The owner and evaluator shake hands and exchange pleasantries. The dog must not show and sign of shyness or resentment, and must not break it's position or try to go to the evaluator.
2. Sit politely for petting (From a friendly stranger. The dog must not show shyness or resentment.)
3. Demonstrate that the dog will welcome being groomed and examined, and will permit a stranger, such as a veterinarian , groomer, or friend of the owner, to do so. (This also demonstrates the owner's care, concern, and responsibility.)
4. Walk on a loose leash. This demonstrates that the owner is in control of the dog.
5. Walk through a crowd. This demostrates the dog can move about politely in pedestrian traffic and is under control in public places.
6. Sit and down on command. This shows that the dog has training, will respond to the owner's commands to Sit and Down and will remain in the place commanded by the owner.
7. Come when called. (A distance of ten feet is used.)
8. Reaction to another dog. The dog must show it can behave politely around other dogs.
9. Reaction to distractions. The dog must demonstrate that it is confident at all times when faced with common distracting situations. Because some dogs are sensitive to sound and some to visual distractions, one of each is used.
10. Supervised separation. The dog must demonstrate that it can be left with another person and will maintain its training and good manners while the owner goes out of sight.
So who lied - the owner or the news?
15
posted on
06/15/2006 7:37:41 PM PDT
by
kevin_in_so_cal
(http://www.boycottmadeinchina.org - http://www.olympicwatch.org)
To: SLB
Weird story. Where is the quote from the owner about how sweet of a dog it is?
16
posted on
06/15/2006 7:49:37 PM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: SLB
"That should have been a double tap to the head or a load of #4s or 5s from about ten feet." If you were to ever do that on a military post, you would very quickly find out that the dog had more friends in high places than you do.
17
posted on
06/15/2006 8:01:33 PM PDT
by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
To: xzins
"Ban them"
who's gonna guard my meth lab???
18
posted on
06/15/2006 8:25:27 PM PDT
by
Luigi Vasellini
(60% of Saudis, 58%of Iraqis, 55%of Kuwaitis,50% of Jordanians married 1st or 2nd cousins. LOL!!!)
To: kevin_in_so_cal
I think the pitt bull owner with the CGC was a different person than the one whose dog attacked the kid. And pitt bulls are, by nature, very people friendly. You have to make a pitt bull into a monster, just like you would with any other dog breed. And most people probably could not identify a pit bull, either. And there are a lot of myths about pit bulls. First, they don't have locking jaws. Second, they don't have a strionger bite than other breeds of similar size. However, I do blame owners if they elect to have this poerful breed because when you own any poeerful breed, it is even more critical to make sure you have a well adjusted dog. No one cares if a jack russel or a chiuahua is psycho, but a big dog, that is a different story.
19
posted on
06/15/2006 9:09:15 PM PDT
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: Luigi Vasellini
Once pits are banned, you can use rotties to guard your meth lab. Once they get banned, you can use dobies. Once they get banned, you can use German Shepherds. Once they get banned, you can use goldens.
20
posted on
06/15/2006 9:10:41 PM PDT
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson