Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

It's coming. Proposed monetary unit, the "Amero,", and Open Borders, No-Visa Access, No customs, Interchangeable Work Force,

You're on your way to becoming a citizen of the North American Union. Isn't it wonderful!

1 posted on 06/14/2006 1:22:06 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Kenny Bunk

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45630


Saturday, August 6, 2005








U.S. sovereignty
slip-sliding away



Posted: August 6, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern



By Henry Lamb





© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

It began in 1994. All the attention was focused on the new WTO emerging from the Uruguay round of GATT negotiations. Little attention was paid to the Summit of the Americas meeting in Miami. The assembled ministers agreed to create a Free Trade Agreement of the Americas and that it would be completed by January 2005, entering into force by December 2005.

For ten years, 34 governments have been conducting negotiating sessions throughout the Americas, fashioning a new trade agreement that will swallow up both NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, and CAFTA, the Central American Free Trade Agreement, and, quite literally, much of the U.S. Constitution.


The final draft agreement addresses every aspect of trade in the Western Hemisphere and requires that every dimension of the agreement be "WTO compliant." Chapter II contains two provisions that should disqualify the document immediately from any serious consideration by the U.S. Congress.

Article 4.2 contains this language:


4.2. The Parties shall ensure that their laws, regulations and administrative procedures are consistent with the obligations of this Agreement. The rights and obligations under this Agreement are the same for all the Parties, whether Federal or unitary States, including the different levels and branches of government. ...
This language requires that existing laws – at every level of government – be conformed to the requirements of the agreement. It requires that all future laws conform as well. The effect of this agreement takes away law-making power from duly elected representatives of the people and gives it to unelected bureaucrats, most of whom represent foreign nations.

This language is consistent with the WTO, NAFTA and CAFTA, all of which were approved by Congress. Both NAFTA and the WTO have required revisions of dozens of domestic laws. CAFTA will do the same, and the FTAA will continue to take away laws that the peoples' representatives have enacted.

This process is transforming the meaning of national sovereignty. Article 3(g) stipulates that the agreement is governed by the principles of "sovereign equality." This is a term that arises from the 1995 publication of "Our Global Neighborhood," the report of the U.N.-funded Commission on Global Governance. In Chapter II, under the heading Democracy and Legitimacy (page 66), a lengthy discussion proclaims that the concept of national sovereignty must be revised. Ideas are introduced such as:


"... countries are having to accept that in certain fields, sovereignty has to be executed collectively ..." (page 70)
"... there is a need to weigh a state's right to autonomy against its people's right to security." (page 71)

"It is time to think about self-determination in the emerging context of a global neighborhood rather than the traditional context of a world of separate states." (page 337)

Thus, the concept of "sovereign equality" emerges to replace the concept of national sovereignty.


National sovereignty embraces the belief that every nation has equal sovereignty – independent and supreme authority over its territory. "Sovereign equality," on the other hand, is the belief that every nation has equal sovereign authority – under a common, or collective, supreme authority. The FTAA represents this supreme authority in the Western Hemisphere, in much the same way as the European Union seeks to become the supreme authority in Europe, both of which are subservient to the WTO, which functions within the United Nations' family of international organizations.

These two provisions alone should be enough to scrap this agreement. The negotiators have accepted this language, as has the administration. Congress is the only hope Americans have to reject this entangling agreement. Congressmen will not read this language, however. They will listen, instead, to the lobbyists, the arm-twisting messengers from the administration and editorials from the major media.

They will be told that the agreement is an expansion of free trade and that failure to approve the agreement will label the U.S. as isolationist, a rebel in the global neighborhood. These arguments have been successful with NAFTA, CAFTA and the WTO. Ordinary people know better.

Ordinary people still have time to be heard on this agreement. Ordinary people elect these representatives, and politicians are dependent upon them for re-election. Ordinary people are the only power on earth greater than the power of the U.S. government. If ordinary people fail to defend their freedom, no one will defend it for them.

The Free Trade Agreement of the Americas is an extraordinary erosion of freedom, for this nation and for every citizen.







Henry Lamb is the executive vice president of the Environmental Conservation Organization and chairman of Sovereignty International.


184 posted on 06/14/2006 3:23:40 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (No more quarter for RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk

Good g*d the twit factor on this thread sure is high. All the same thanks for posting the article, I'll try to tune in. Should be interesting.


191 posted on 06/14/2006 3:27:49 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Smartass; JustPiper; SeaBiscuit; OKIEDOC; La Enchiladita; potlatch; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; ...

Ping in case you are interested in this thread.


288 posted on 06/14/2006 6:51:15 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Who controls the British Crown?
Who keeps the metric system down?
We Do! We Do!

Who keeps Atlantis off the maps?
Who keeps the Martians under wraps?
We Do! We Do!

Who holds back the electric car?
Who makes Steve Guttenberg a star?
We Do! We Do!

Who robs cavefish of their sight?
Who rigs every Oscar night?
We Do! We Do!


They have a plan....


290 posted on 06/14/2006 6:59:17 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk
Department of Homeland Security Fact Sheet: Security and Prosperity Partnership
299 posted on 06/14/2006 7:26:46 PM PDT by jer33 3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk
Prosperity Working Groups Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America
300 posted on 06/14/2006 7:31:03 PM PDT by jer33 3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk; Gelato; Waywardson; Broadside; Taxman; Ladycalif

Ping to #317.


318 posted on 06/14/2006 10:10:28 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (No more quarter for RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk

Thank you Congressman Tancredo! It will be fun watching this unravel.


329 posted on 06/15/2006 6:22:16 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk

A union I can love. From Polipundit this AM:

Union Local 2544 U.S. Border Patrol


I have a question. Who can best comment on securing the border?

College Professors? Politicians in Washington? How about the members of the largest Union Local representing actual Border Patrol Agents?

Union Local 2544, represents Border Patrol agents and non-supervisory employees in the Tucson Sector of the U.S. Border Patrol, covering most of the state of Arizona. They are the largest local in the Border Patrol. Local 2544 Officers are all Border Patrol agents.

These are the men and women that toil in 100 degree summer heat. These are the men and women that risk their lives every day not knowing what they will encounter. They are the ones that have to live with the deals made in air conditioned offices within the beltway. They are serving on the front lines and have some very strong opinions. They have gpaidh for the right to speak out and deserve to be heard.

Here are the opinions of these brave agents, in their own words;

We fully support legal immigration, but we stand firmly against illegal immigration. We strongly oppose any attempts to reward illegal alien lawbreakers. We have risked our lives to keep them out of this country. The slick politicians can call it gguest-workerh or gearned legalizationh all they want, but itfs amnesty. Some of these politicians have missed their true calling. They need to be working down at the County Fair selling tickets to innocent children to try and shoot a 14 basketball through a 12 hoop so they can win the big stuffed animal.

Local 2544 has not been consulted in any way, shape, or form regarding the deployment of National Guard troops in this Sector. This is being posted in response to multiple questions about our involvement in this process. In a nutshell, there is no involvement. We were told we would be consulted. We werenft.

What gGuest Workerh and gEarned Legalizationh Really Mean - Donft those terms sound warm and fuzzy? Wellccin addition to the facts contained in the blog linked here regarding the administration of IRCA 1986, frontline Border Patrol agents were ordered to immediately release any illegal alien who made an amnesty claim, no questions asked, even though we were routinely uncovering massive fraud with simple field interrogation techniques. The illegal aliens we questioned before this order came down were mostly lying, and we were catching them in lies one right after another. Many had just entered the United States, but falsely claimed they had entered years before so they could gqualifyh for amnesty. One large group was tracked down and apprehended on the Tohono OfOdham Indian reservation about 10 miles from the border (in the middle of nowhere - therefs nothing out there, no roads, and no legitimate/lawful reason for illegal aliens to be there). Two of them had freshly minted gamnestyh cards. When questioned about the glast entryh they made into the U.S. from Mexico, the cardholders claimed they had entered years before and were just gvisitingh the rest of the group (approximately 100 total). Of course, their clams were ludicrous. (link for more)

Senator McCain Sells Us Out (again) - Senator McCain voted for the Amnesty Bill (S. 2611). Senator McCain has never been a friend to rank-and-file Border Patrol agents. He routinely ignores correspondence from Border Patrol agents and often gives the impression that he is just too big and too important to deal with us. He attempts to undermine our mission at every turn and actively supports the criminals who violate our laws. He always trys to downplay the fact that illegal aliens knowingly and willingly violate our laws, and he is a close ally on immigration matters with Senator Ted Kennedy, who we believe is the biggest disgrace of all time in the United States Senate.

Every day that President Bush and the Senate hold real border security hostage to their misguided amnesty program, thousands upon thousands of illegal aliens continue to flood into the country. Make no mistake, most of them get by us. We are losing this war, and itfs not even close. Contact your senators and congressmen now. Tell them to secure the border and tell them to reject amnesty programs (so called gguest-worker").

The Border Patrol has earned our support and ask for us to do one simple task, gContact your senators and congressmen now. Tell them to secure the border and tell them to reject amnesty programs (so called gguest-worker").h If you support the men and women who risk their lives defending the border you know what to do.

-- Oak Leaf


331 posted on 06/15/2006 6:30:56 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk

This is a great point from Polipundit:


But, But, I Thought We Needed New Laws To Do this?


I just read that U.S. officials are beefing up efforts to stop immigration document fraud.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement has created 10 anti-fraud task forces across the nation in addition to the existing unit in Washington, D.C. The task forces have opened 250 probes since they began work in April, says Special Agent Scott Weber, chief of identity and benefit fraud for ICE.

Hmm, ICE Assistant Secretary Julie Myers confirms that “Immigration fraud is “a problem of epidemic proportions.” So that means, it is an old and ongoing problem.

Then why do we need “new laws” when the Administration can do these positive steps on their own?

Better question, why now not five years ago?

-- Oak Leaf


336 posted on 06/15/2006 7:22:25 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk

bttt


338 posted on 06/15/2006 7:37:35 AM PDT by tertiary01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk
Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."

SSP operates strictly on a need-to-know basis --- and the American taxpayers and Congressmen don't need to know. Until it's too late.

If there is to be an Amero, or whatever name, the American & Canadien taxpayers will get screwed for the benefit of the poorest big country in the world Mexico.

344 posted on 06/15/2006 9:45:18 AM PDT by citizen (Yo W! Read my lips: No Amnistia by any name! And the White House has a fence around it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
701 posted on 06/19/2006 2:27:37 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson