Skip to comments.
Lacrosse Scandal: The Duke Accuser—New Credibility Questions (Newsweek)
Newsweek ^
| June 19, 2006 Issue
| Susannah Meadows
Posted on 06/11/2006 10:06:55 AM PDT by zaxxon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 681-685 next last
1
posted on
06/11/2006 10:06:59 AM PDT
by
zaxxon
To: zaxxon
2
posted on
06/11/2006 10:09:47 AM PDT
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: zaxxon
Hmmmm....Newsweek, not Newsmax?
There seems to be some kind of leakage.....truth is seeping into the MSM.
To: Blueflag
I hope that when this is all over, the 3 LaCrosse guys sue Nifong, the accuser and that they both wind up behind in bars.
4
posted on
06/11/2006 10:12:14 AM PDT
by
Signalman
To: zaxxon
This should provide Hannity & Colmes with at least another month of Duke Lacrosse 20 minute "updates." That show has become so pathetic that I've switched to Scarborough.
For FNC Duke Lacrosse has become this year's Natilee Holloway.
5
posted on
06/11/2006 10:12:44 AM PDT
by
BW2221
To: Bobkk47
Same here. This woman should pay for what she's done to these students. (Not to mention the harm she's done to women in the future who might actually be raped--and not believed because this idiot cried wolf.)
6
posted on
06/11/2006 10:13:53 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: zaxxon
Nicolas Kristof has an oped piece on the Durham case in the NYT today comparing the Duke players to the Scottsboro Boys.
Any hardy souls (hardy indeed) with access to the NYT select? I certainly wouldn't pay Pinch Sultzberg any money.
7
posted on
06/11/2006 10:15:12 AM PDT
by
OrinocoJack
(Free the Ham Sammich! Disbar Nifong!)
To: zaxxon
If this case goes to court,Nifong will be laughed out of the courthouse.The tragedy is that the defendants and their parents have probably spent many thousands of dollars to defend themselves.I believe some states will reimburse a defendant some of the costs incurred if found not guilty.
8
posted on
06/11/2006 10:15:53 AM PDT
by
Thombo2
To: zaxxon
How typical of a Rat to take the word of a whore and run with it.
To: zaxxon
what's sad is a coach resigned, a season cancelled and 3 guys have their names smeared for life..a university taking action on a baseless accusation..they were considered guilty until proven innocent, not exactly the way things are supposed to work.
I've tried to keep an open mind about this and not decide anything, however, the more I read about this case, the more it appears this "Precious dancer thing" had $$ on her mind..
in the history of the world, there's been no such thing as a successful liar..too many stories to try and keep straight..
10
posted on
06/11/2006 10:18:34 AM PDT
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(I'm a Patriot Guard Rider..www.patriotguard.org for info)
To: MizSterious
This woman should pay for what she's done to these students. She could never have done anything to anybody if the D.A. had not been a politically-motivated whore.
Nifong needs to spend time behind bars for prosecutor misconduct.
11
posted on
06/11/2006 10:21:57 AM PDT
by
Polybius
To: zaxxon
Sounds like the prosecutor could go after her for prositiution. But I doubt he will.
To: Thombo2
The county/state (depends on NC law) will pay millions to players, parents, coach, etc.
Secondly, can we now stop calling her a "dancer" and begin to refer to her as what she is, a "prostitute." No need to be pejorative with 'whore" or "ho" but "prostitute" is certainly applicable.
13
posted on
06/11/2006 10:26:01 AM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
To: Perdogg; Howlin; Peach; ladyjane; Alia; abb; Locomotive Breath; Mike Nifong; Jezebelle; ...
As I understand it now, this whole business of
"injuries consistent with being raped and sexually assaulted vaginally and anally," appears now to be a figment of some investigator's imagination. According to the article, the medical report did not say that! This is hugh and series!
"Quoting from the report, which was submitted to the court under seal, the motion states that the nursewho was in trainingexamined the woman's entire pelvic region and noted only diffuse swelling of the vaginal walls, a condition explainable by consensual sexual activity."
What say you Wendy Murphy et al?
14
posted on
06/11/2006 10:31:49 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: BW2221
If you don't like to hear about this case why did you come on this thread?
15
posted on
06/11/2006 10:34:29 AM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: pepperhead
If you don't like to hear about this case why did you come on this thread? Stop that! Don't you know the PC Police can arrest you for brandishing logic!! LOLOLOLOLOL
16
posted on
06/11/2006 10:39:01 AM PDT
by
abb
(If it Ain't Posted on FreeRepublic, it Ain't News)
To: MizSterious
Not to mention the harm she's done to women in the future who might actually be raped--and not believed because this idiot cried wolf. Right, this is only hurting real victims of future rapes. Gloria Allred seems to be coming around. The rest of the women in the so called movement need to come out and speak out against this sham of a case too. This "striper" isn't going to help any womens causes.
17
posted on
06/11/2006 10:39:21 AM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: zaxxon
Susannah Meadows stopped drinking the koolaid!?!
18
posted on
06/11/2006 10:41:11 AM PDT
by
maggief
(and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
To: Thombo2
The tragedy is that the defendants and their parents have probably spent many thousands of dollars to defend themselves.
A article I read the other day said the ones that haven't been indited have already spent 14,000 dollars protecting themselves.
19
posted on
06/11/2006 10:42:13 AM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: abb
20
posted on
06/11/2006 10:43:42 AM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 681-685 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson