So true, so true...
Posted on 05/30/2006 10:01:14 AM PDT by NapkinUser
"In Quebec, the Amereaux"?
The Amereaux works for South Louisiana too.LOL
Allow me to paint a scenario for you; Several southern/border states are overrun with illegal intruders. Those states start "reaping the fruits" of such activity. The other 40-some states see what's happening and begin to legislate things on their own in order to prevent it from happening to them. There's a bsttle between many states and the feds at that point. At that point, many states that don't want their state to go the way of those converted to socialist meccas for illegals band together to tell the federal government to stick its wang up its colon.
I wouldn't know what happens after that, and there are many possible scenarios, but I can't see all 50 sittin' still for this once the Mexicans begin to permeate the nation. Maybe I'm wrong, but I can't fathom it.
"Y'all" was aok with this cowgirl! :-)
Thanks for the post. The video is something everyone here needs to view.
The first time I heard the word "stakeholder" was in the report by Bush, Fox and Martin in "Partnership for Prosperity" report. I have to agree this report was not democratic nor representative government.
LOL! Well then by golly I'll reinsert ,Y'all, back into my tag line. Spell check didn't comprende ustedes, anyway. :~)
| The Evolution of Mathematics |
|
Last week I purchased a burger and fries at McDonalds for $3.58. The counter girl took my $4.00 and I pulled 8 cents from my pocket and gave it to her. She stood there, holding the nickel and 3 pennies. While looking at the screen on her register, I sensed her discomfort and tried to tell her to just give me two quarters, but she hailed the manager for help. While he tried to explain the transaction to her, she stood there and cried. Why do I tell you this? Because of the evolution in teaching math since the 1950s........... Teaching Math In 1950 A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit? Teaching Math In 1970 A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit? Teaching Math In 1990 A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80. Did he make a profit? Teaching Math In 2006 Un ranchero vende una carretera de maderapara $100. El cuesto de la produccion era $80. Su beneficio es $20. ¿Cuánto dinero se puede tomar del ranchero, a la paga para las ventajas libres, para Los Extranjeros Ilegales? |
Oops. ...ping
I love that and young people don't believe education has gone downhill throught the years.
LOL. Sadly, I think you are not too far off.
Great posts & articles tonight.
Good evening Chik:
Lots of great posts alright. Did you catch that one thread with the misplaced rant, of no NWO, globalization, or CFR? What a laugher! It was like this person was living a deep cave for the last ten years with burned out candles.
Thanks AC.
Interesting article but it indicates that this route is NOT a major one for terrorists which is what I said. The information within it is several years old and also comes from a man who was arrested and convicted hence his operation was detected and brought down.
Since the ones we must worry about are those with intelligence training and experience we will not find them involved in operations of which they are not completely secure. That is why they have sophisticated forgery operatives who can provide them with multiple passports and identities. They are not going to risk highly trained operatives trying to sneak across with a bunch of poor peons.
I did not "contradict" myself. Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the concept of mockery.
Read more carefully so you will not look quite as stupid. I said "Now we are to fear Mexico DEVELOPING...." Nor is Mexico "subverting our sovereignty" though what they are doing about our "souvereignty" I can't say.
Perhaps Nuking Mexico City is not as good as MOABing it. A bigger bang is always better.
An "opposite" conclusion would be one which instead of finding a huge impact finds No impact or a small one. Such a study would be gone over with a fine tooth comb and any flaw in methodology or fact revealed. You did not do that kind of analysis for this one which is a form of intellectual dishonesty.
In fact, it is precisely the studies which you believe or want to believe which should be MORE closely scrutinized.
In the last twenty years apparently 11-12 million Illegals have arrived hence I see no reason to assume the next twenty years will be different.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.