Skip to comments.
Arrests made in Duke lacrosse case
News & Observer ^
| Apr 18, 2006
| Anne Blythe and Benjamin Niolet
Posted on 04/18/2006 3:26:57 AM PDT by Mad-Margaret
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 2,661-2,674 next last
To: Warren_Piece
Agreed! There is a wealth of knowledge here on FR. That is why I spend so much time on this site.
Maria
221
posted on
04/18/2006 6:02:13 AM PDT
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: Mad-Margaret
Both boys have been identified. They have been charged with kidnapping. They have posted bond and been released.
222
posted on
04/18/2006 6:02:48 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: notigar
Yes, they could have worn condoms. And as I said, condoms leave enough of their own trace evidence that forensics can often identify exactly which brand of condom was used.
Regarding that e-mail, there was a Time magazine article yesterday that said that defense attorneys say a sting operation was used with that e-mail and that the actual e-mail was sent by the police to all the players. And on MSNBC, someone (Dan Abrams, I think) said the player who presumably sent the e-mail was actually in class the time the e-mail was sent.
223
posted on
04/18/2006 6:03:07 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: libstripper
mariabush: "My gripe is that not one person on these threads were present at that house, everyone has suddenly become an expert on the "crime".
This is not a case of boys will be boys."
libstripper: "You've assumed the primary fact in issue--that she really was raped--when no credible cevidence of any such thing has been presented. Please elucidate the rest of us ignorant souls on what credible evidence there is that she actually was raped."
I don't see where she assumed that at all. She basically said she isn't sure and doesn't see how others can be sure either.
I don't like the grand jury system - one thing I don't like about is that the DA doesn't have to present all the evidence but just enough to get an indictment. We have no idea what evidence there is (or what evidence is notably missing)
224
posted on
04/18/2006 6:03:14 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(You can always tell the pioneers by the arrows in their backs.)
To: Warren_Piece
"If the DA shows his hand and reveals that "roofies" were involved, that changes things."How? Couldn't she have brought them and taken them herself?
To: FreedomPoster
She probably got dosed with some GHB. Its fairly common, makes the person seem drunk, and is out of the system in 4 hours.
226
posted on
04/18/2006 6:03:38 AM PDT
by
notigar
To: Perdogg
Rumors are just that. The drug causes the person to pass out and not remember anything.
This certainly does not comport with her detailed account of the assault against her person.
I saw that the new 'spin' is going to be that she was drugged at the party.
227
posted on
04/18/2006 6:04:04 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Perdogg
Interview on NBC-17 in Raleigh.
To: notigar
She probably got dosed with some GHB.
Probably?
229
posted on
04/18/2006 6:04:45 AM PDT
by
maggief
To: CaptainK; Howlin
Did you
even read my post????????????????
I said the father interviewed has twin sons who are part of the LaCrosse team.....not the ones indicted!
SHEEEEESH!
And for the record, it appears the complaining woman has a police record as well.
To: mariabush
If people were jailed for "Behaving like trash" there would not be enough jails in this country to hold them all.
231
posted on
04/18/2006 6:05:37 AM PDT
by
Carolinamom
(Daily legal immigrant to FreeRepublic.com)
To: robertpaulsen
How? Couldn't she have brought them and taken them herself? Yes, but the defense has also admitted that one of the players did give her something to drink at some point.
232
posted on
04/18/2006 6:05:38 AM PDT
by
LWalk18
To: notigar
The woman arrived at the party drunk or drugged. She was also bruised when she arrived at the party. And she was also missing some fake fingernails prior to the party. Photographic evidence show that.
And still, if those boys drugged her, when did they have time to rape her? Have you seen the timeline?
233
posted on
04/18/2006 6:05:53 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: Guenevere
I my boys had been even remotely involved in this mess, I can guarantee that I would not have been on the television claiming that this woman or the DA had ruined their reputations.
If you want to keep your good name intact do not put yourself in situations that would cause it to besmirched.
234
posted on
04/18/2006 6:05:57 AM PDT
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: Froufrou
So, if there's no genetic material on or in the woman, on what grounds can they even take these two men into custody? It's like lack of evidence means nothing anymore.Considering how much we really know abut the case.....I don't think one can come to any conclusion yet.
235
posted on
04/18/2006 6:06:09 AM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
To: Peach
Of course the defense attorney is saying that. He would blame the whole incident on a talking rabbit if he could.
236
posted on
04/18/2006 6:06:35 AM PDT
by
notigar
To: CaptainK
Exactly!!!!!
237
posted on
04/18/2006 6:06:50 AM PDT
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: sirchtruth
without the DNA, he's hasn't got a convincing way to prove it, and he knows it! Prosecutors proved rape cases without DNA for centuries - and, if the assailants wore a condom, they might not leave DNA anyway. Absence of DNA needs to be explained, but it is not conclusive evidence disproving rape.
Certainly, we should keep our eyes on this case and reserve judgment until all the evidence is in. But, the fact that a grand jury found reason to believe a crime had been committed suggests that these allegations have at least some credibility.
238
posted on
04/18/2006 6:06:52 AM PDT
by
jude24
("The Church is a harlot, but she is my mother." - St. Augustine)
To: notigar
Condoms leak and are messy. Some DNA is going to get out.
239
posted on
04/18/2006 6:07:01 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(The Opinions expressed by Perdogg are correct and should be relied upon)
To: notigar
So change the subject, eh?
Some have said she was drunk on arrival, and that the pics seem to indicate this.
240
posted on
04/18/2006 6:07:22 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 2,661-2,674 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson