Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homo erectus 'to' modern man: evolution or human variability?
Answers in Genesis ^ | April 1994 | A. W. (Bill) Mehlert

Posted on 01/29/2006 8:19:28 AM PST by mlc9852

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: tpaine

"taxon Homo erectus should be laid to rest"

I believe some scientists already have laid it to rest.


21 posted on 01/29/2006 12:34:11 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Interesting summation in the link of Wolpoff's theories. Do you agree with his five races theory?


22 posted on 01/29/2006 12:48:50 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

"Do you agree with his five races theory?"

It seems apparent there are different races. What implications that has for evolution, I'm not sure. What do you think?


23 posted on 01/29/2006 1:04:49 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"Interesting summation in the link of Wolpoff's theories. Do you agree with his five races theory?"

Yes. Wolpoff has the most believeable ideas, multiregionalism.

Race And Human Evolution: A Fatal Attraction

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com
There are two widely held scientific theories concerning the origin of the human species. One posits a single cradle, generally thought to be in Africa, in which Homo sapiens originated. This dominant theory is assisted by its charismatic spokesmodel Eve, a fictitious personification of a DNA strain that some scientists argue indicates a unique source for the Earth's human population.
The other, decidedly less popular theory is known as multiregionalism. Multiregionalists argue that populations may have originated in Africa, but these populations migrated to distant regions where the human species developed and took on different characteristics, known to scientists as biological diversity but more conventionally referred to as different races.
This divide is obviously controversial, and it is not always the steady eye of science that influences which model is deemed correct (or at least politically correct).
After all, one model promises a scientific verification of our common humanity, the other, interpreted too loosely, could result in a scientific rationale that hardens concepts of racial difference.

Anthropological researchers (and husband and wife) Milford Wolpoff and Rachel Caspari have written Race and Human Evolution as an accessible introduction to the debates over the origins of the human species that makes a careful and detailed case for multiregionalism.
Much of the authors' effort is directed at separating their scientifically sound position from the racist legacy of earlier theories of polygenism, which argued that races were genetically isolated.
They also mount compelling arguments that the "single source of humanity" camp has succeeded thanks to good marketing rather than hard or conclusive data.
Their book proves not only an interesting introduction to anthropological debates, it also reflects the way a scientific thesis is formulated, developed, and defended in the media-savvy late 20th century.

From Publishers Weekly
This uneven volume from University of Michigan anthropologists Wolpoff and Caspari defends Wolpoff's theory that human evolution resulted from long-term "multiregional evolution" rather than via a relatively recent descent from a single "Eve" in Africa.
The authors largely base their case on the fossil record, which contains evidence that, they contend, doesn't jibe with the Eve theory, which was derived primarily through DNA analysis by molecular biologists.
Their argument is well-reasoned but some of the basic concepts, including that of multiregional evolution, could use a clearer explication. Technical material abounds, much of it likely to prove difficult for the general reader.
And, while Wolpoff receives top authorial billing, the text is presented mostly in the first-person singular from Caspari's perspective, an intrusive stylistic device. There's much to ponder here, though, and the middle chapters, which place paleoanthropology in a historical and political context, are sound and informative. Illustrations.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.

24 posted on 01/29/2006 1:10:19 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I support his theory, do you?

"--- Wolpoff and his colleagues of the University of Michigan, because they believe the five main human races - Negroid, Caucasoids, Mongoloids, Australian aborigines and southern African bushmen -began their evolutionary divergence well before becoming anatomically modern Homo sapiens, totally reject the 'out of Africa' hypothesis, whereby all modern people owe their ancestry to Africa only -the Noah's Ark theory. ---"


25 posted on 01/29/2006 1:13:43 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Homo erectus...hehe, hehe, hehehe, hehehe...

26 posted on 01/29/2006 1:16:41 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thanks for the comments & link..


27 posted on 01/29/2006 1:17:15 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Feeling erectile Luis?


28 posted on 01/29/2006 1:18:40 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

You're still here?

I just checked out your FR homepage, two things...

My name is there, why?

That whole no paragraphs, run-on sentence thing you have going on...we need to keep you away from guns and clock towers.


29 posted on 01/29/2006 1:21:25 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"Feeling erectile Luis?"

Are you hitting on me?

The answer is still no.

:-)

30 posted on 01/29/2006 1:31:58 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

You wish.


31 posted on 01/29/2006 1:33:47 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Luis Gonzalez wrote:

You're still here?

Yep, newly reinstated, after a looong time out.

I just checked out your FR homepage, two things... My name is there, why?

Read much? - It's an old ping list.

FFR ping list: A CA Guy; Amelia; ArneFufkin; blackbart.223; Bush2000; Chad Fairbanks; ClancyJ; COB1; Cultural Jihad; CWOJackson; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; doug from upland; freebilly; Howlin; Humidston; justshe; Kevin Curry; ladyinred; Lowelljr; Lucius Cornelius Sulla; Luis Gonzalez; MadIvan; Miss Marple; Mo1; Ms. AntiFeminazi; OneidaM; nopardons; RedBloodedAmerican; rintense; Roscoe; Russell Scott; sinkspur; Southflanknorthpawsis; terilyn; Texasforever; wimpycat; chancellor palpatine; --

That whole no paragraphs, run-on sentence thing you have going on...we need to keep you away from guns and clock towers.

I did that long ago, Looie, just to irritate guys like you.
-- It works well.

32 posted on 01/29/2006 1:47:31 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

Wow. A 14 month time out? You should have gotten a Vermont judge.


33 posted on 01/29/2006 1:51:58 PM PST by Richard Kimball (Look, Daddy! Teacher says every time a Kennedy talks, a Republican gets a house seat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: digger48

That's so, just as man progresses, so to he can regress.


34 posted on 01/29/2006 1:53:49 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: digger48

There must be room for Ted Kennedy in there.


35 posted on 01/29/2006 1:54:40 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Thanks for posting. If there is an anthropology ping list, I'd like to be on it.


36 posted on 01/29/2006 1:58:32 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

I don't know if there is an anthropology list, but I'd like to be on it, also.


37 posted on 01/29/2006 2:06:04 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852; COBOL2Java; SunkenCiv
"If there is an anthropology ping list, I'd like to be on it."

Yes there is we call it the GGG list which is short for 'Gods, Graves, Glyphs'.

Freeper 'SunkenCiv' does an excellent job of managing the list too.

At last count, we had 521 'subscribers.'

38 posted on 01/29/2006 2:13:39 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: blam; SunkenCiv

Thanks! SunkenCiv, please add me to the 'GGG' list.


39 posted on 01/29/2006 2:16:05 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Was it 14 months? -- Time does fly when you're banned.


40 posted on 01/29/2006 2:17:20 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson