Skip to comments.
Scientists 'see new species born'
BBC News Online science editor ^
| 2004 June
| By Dr David Whitehouse
Posted on 11/20/2005 9:27:40 AM PST by restornu
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-445 next last
To: onedoug; nicmarlo; phantomworker; Dimensio
And this conflicts with Genesis how? Though God all things are possible!
Some call it evolution...
others view it in terms of "A Work In Progress" when one door closes another one Opens!
21
posted on
11/20/2005 10:08:06 AM PST
by
restornu
(Rush 24/7 Adopt-A-Soldier Program solution to CNN)
To: Dimensio
Just to level set, what is the definition of "species"?
22
posted on
11/20/2005 10:12:40 AM PST
by
phantomworker
(A new day! Begin it serenely; with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense!)
To: Lakeshark; phantomworker
a new species? wouldn't that mean VERY YOUNG???? ppppfffffttttt!!! : )
23
posted on
11/20/2005 10:16:03 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: nicmarlo; Borax Queen; Lakeshark; restornu
If its highly likely that fruit flies live in rotten fruit and just hatch, then why do I feel like rotten fruit sometimes with the fruit flies I attract? Drum roll..... LOL (Sorry I couldn't resist that one)
24
posted on
11/20/2005 10:17:30 AM PST
by
phantomworker
(A new day! Begin it serenely; with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense!)
To: phantomworker; Borax Queen; Lakeshark; restornu
lol! (I'm not going to answer that one!!!! : )
25
posted on
11/20/2005 10:18:33 AM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: restornu
Wake me up when the fruit flies speciate into something else besides other fruit flies.
26
posted on
11/20/2005 10:19:44 AM PST
by
fzx12345
(This space is unintentionally left blank.)
To: Lakeshark; nicmarlo
And here I thought I was the new species........ Yes, dear, there is no Santa Claus.
27
posted on
11/20/2005 10:19:48 AM PST
by
phantomworker
(A new day! Begin it serenely; with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense!)
To: phantomworker
... what is the definition of "species"? You'll encounter more than one definition. It's a tad fuzzy because all creatures form a continuum, so where you draw the line between closely-related species can seem arbitrary. Usually, the line is drawn where the two versions don't interbreed, at least not often or successfully, but there are exceptions to that.
As time goes on, and the two groups mutate in isolation, it becomes increasingly obvious where the line should be drawn. It's even more obvious if the intermediate stages no longer exist. But sometimes it's a tough call. This seems to be because the development of new species is an ongoing process.
28
posted on
11/20/2005 10:21:43 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: PatrickHenry
Great. Thank you. That makes a lot of sense.
29
posted on
11/20/2005 10:25:00 AM PST
by
phantomworker
(A new day! Begin it serenely; with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense!)
To: restornu
That fly turned into that women? woa
To: phantomworker; null and void
31
posted on
11/20/2005 10:35:36 AM PST
by
restornu
(Rush 24/7 Adopt-A-Soldier Program solution to CNN)
To: fzx12345
Wake me up when the fruit flies speciate into something else besides other fruit flies. Some people just prefer to use alarm clocks
To: phantomworker
In discussing whether the races of man were distinct species (and concluding -- contrary to the opinion of most of his contempories -- that they were not), Darwin himself expressed confusion over the term "species":
But it is a hopeless endeavour to decide this point, until some definition of the term "species" is generally accepted; and the definition must not include an indeterminate element such as an act of creation. We might as well attempt without any definition to decide whether a certain number of houses should be called a village, town, or city. We have a practical illustration of the difficulty in the never-ending doubts whether many closely-allied mammals, birds, insects, and plants, which represent each other respectively in North America and Europe, should be ranked as species or geographical races; and the like holds true of the productions of many islands situated at some little distance from the nearest continent.
Descent of Man, Chapter 7.
33
posted on
11/20/2005 10:38:26 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: phantomworker
34
posted on
11/20/2005 10:41:09 AM PST
by
null and void
(The enemy of my enemy is my tool...)
To: null and void
35
posted on
11/20/2005 10:45:36 AM PST
by
phantomworker
(A new day! Begin it serenely; with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense!)
To: restornu
36
posted on
11/20/2005 10:48:03 AM PST
by
austinmark
(Torture? Koran abuse? ... I'd Rather Be A Koran In Gitmo THAN A Bible in Saudi Arabia !!!)
To: fzx12345
Wake me up when the fruit flies speciate into something else besides other fruit flies.Close your eyes and go to sleep.
To: phantomworker
Drum roll..... Might not let you forget that one....
:-)
38
posted on
11/20/2005 10:56:40 AM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: phantomworker; nicmarlo; null and void
Was this the kind of fly?
39
posted on
11/20/2005 10:58:18 AM PST
by
restornu
(Rush 24/7 Adopt-A-Soldier Program solution to CNN)
To: restornu
Maybe it was an elephant fly.
40
posted on
11/20/2005 11:02:45 AM PST
by
Gumlegs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-445 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson