Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why didn't they think?

Posted on 09/22/2005 8:52:39 AM PDT by the tongue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2005 8:52:42 AM PDT by the tongue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: the tongue

Landing gear down means the plane burns more fuel which certainly impacts flight plans, etc..


2 posted on 09/22/2005 8:54:35 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

Flying cross country at cruising altitude with a dangling nose wheel is a very bad idea.


3 posted on 09/22/2005 8:54:36 AM PDT by Alouette (Militant Neocon Pundit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

The landing gear stuck down is a major safety risk. It is best if they stick close to an airport that is prepared for an emergency landing than to try to make it across the states and have to make an emergency landing at an airport that isn't ready.


4 posted on 09/22/2005 8:55:06 AM PDT by mnehring (Fourth Estate, Fifth Column Dis-Infomers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

The front landing gear was stuck and would not close causing too much drag on the aircraft, it might not have had the fuel to get to NYC.

You should not fly in a broken aircraft. The entire situation would have been a 30 minute deal had they been able to dump the tanks.

I was unaware that specific aircraft could not dump its tanks.


5 posted on 09/22/2005 8:55:07 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

I'm not sure it's OK to fly that far at high speed with the landing gear down.


6 posted on 09/22/2005 8:55:13 AM PDT by Trampled by Lambs (This Tagline is on hiatus as I think of a new one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue
a question came to me.

By my count there were at least three.

And vanities aren't news.

7 posted on 09/22/2005 8:55:30 AM PDT by martin_fierro (We few. We silly few.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

There's a reason why the wheels are built to retract.

Aerodynamics. Maneuvering. Fuel consumption.


8 posted on 09/22/2005 8:55:41 AM PDT by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

The gear wouldn't retract...therefore it would cause drag on the aircraft, giving them bad performance and likely not making it to NY, even with reserves.


9 posted on 09/22/2005 8:55:45 AM PDT by SweetPilotofCanuckistan (DeLay/Laura Bush '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

landing took place in daylight - better conditions for pilot and rescue workers.


10 posted on 09/22/2005 8:56:05 AM PDT by yeetch! (Enjoy the good times (these are the good old days)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

If the landing gear was stuck down, the drag and speed limiting (you cannot exceed a certain speed without damage to the gear and plane) would drastically shorten the range. And protocol with inflight emergencies says you get the thing on the ground ASAP.


11 posted on 09/22/2005 8:56:17 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

Supposidly that plane has no ability to dump fuel

That was from 2 aircraft mechanics I work with


12 posted on 09/22/2005 8:56:36 AM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

I kinda wondered the same thing. But could the extended front landing gear have been a significant safety concern on a cross country flight?


13 posted on 09/22/2005 8:57:16 AM PDT by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue
two reasons..

1st... landing gear could not be retracted.. and the cannot make a cross country flight with the landing gear down due to the excessive drag and damage that could be caused by the gear being down..

2nd... they were unsure what other damage that it may have cause.. if it had caused damage to the hydraulic system and they had attempted a cross country flight and the hydraulics fail... well you can guess the outcome...
14 posted on 09/22/2005 8:57:35 AM PDT by Americanwolf ("You are stuck on Stupid" --- Louisiana National Guard General Honree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

And besides all of the above, it would have been post-sunset in New York. That's a bad time of day to have a possible "off-airport" linding.


15 posted on 09/22/2005 8:58:03 AM PDT by Excellence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

And besides all of the above, it would have been post-sunset in New York. That's a bad time of day to have a possible "off-airport" landing.


16 posted on 09/22/2005 8:58:20 AM PDT by Excellence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

Because the problem that caused the landing gear to fail to retract could have been caused by an electrical short and that would lead, potentially, to a fire. Plus leaving the gear down that way puts additional stress on the aircraft (because of the drag it induces) and makes it harder to control.


17 posted on 09/22/2005 8:58:46 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

so important had to posted twice.. eh? :)


18 posted on 09/22/2005 8:59:00 AM PDT by Americanwolf ("You are stuck on Stupid" --- Louisiana National Guard General Honree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: the tongue
A more important question is:
Did they get credit for the miles they flew during the 3 hours they went around and around?
19 posted on 09/22/2005 8:59:15 AM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue


The Pilot was flying a loop in which he always had an airport in front of him in case the situation changed drastically he could land quickly.


20 posted on 09/22/2005 8:59:26 AM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson