Skip to comments.
DAY 57 DUmmies Held Hostage
June 23, 2005
| self
Posted on 06/23/2005 5:49:40 AM PDT by franksolich
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: SoothingDave
Upon having a good night's sleep and going back to review some of the latest Andyite posts, this new "situation" still seems calculated to me.
I can pick apart little things but overall, the things being said are hitting me wrong. I can't quite put my finger on it but it feels like with this latest hospital stay, they are trying to cover some of the discrepancies we have pointed out here. Of course, they're answers to the big questions fall short.
41
posted on
06/23/2005 1:00:22 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(My family wishes I would cook a meal like they have at Gitmo!)
To: CAluvdubya
42
posted on
06/23/2005 1:02:10 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(My family wishes I would cook a meal like they have at Gitmo!)
To: franksolich
43
posted on
06/23/2005 1:03:38 PM PDT
by
MisterRepublican
("I am not at all comfortable going to Andy for confirmation of anything."- William Rivers Pitt)
To: MisterRepublican
That is hilarious, the Grand DUmbo "Skinner" locking "chicken"--the food itself, recipes and stuff--as a subject in DUmmieland--but of course it's obvious why he had to do it.
Since a certain, uh, subject is banned from discussion in DUmmieland, it was inevitable, one supposes, that certain people would use "code" to discuss that banned thing.
Of course there is a simple solution to all this, which would elevate DUmmieland considerably--but the Grand DUmbo "Skinner," despite my respect for him, does not pay attention to any of my suggestions.
44
posted on
06/23/2005 1:09:28 PM PDT
by
franksolich
(too many coincidences to be coincidental)
To: Chappaquiddick Crawdad
DUMMIE ALERT!
DUMMIE ALERT!
DISCUSSION OF CHICKEN BANNED IN DUMMIELAND!
CHICKEN RECIPES FOUND TO NOT BE INNOCENT ITEMS AFTER ALL!
SEE POSTS 43 AND 44 ABOVE!
45
posted on
06/23/2005 1:16:17 PM PDT
by
franksolich
(too many coincidences to be coincidental)
To: stands2reason; commonguymd; eyespysomething; Repub4bush; volvox; mozrock; ShorelineMike; ...
chappaquiddick crawdad, I added your name to the ping list, and it messed up.
46
posted on
06/23/2005 1:21:18 PM PDT
by
franksolich
(too many coincidences to be coincidental)
To: franksolich
It would appear they are not discussing "chicken" at all, but I have neither the time nor inclination to investigate. I generally ignore the Lounge at DU, as one would ignore a strangers child acting up in a department store.
47
posted on
06/23/2005 1:21:20 PM PDT
by
MisterRepublican
("I am not at all comfortable going to Andy for confirmation of anything."- William Rivers Pitt)
To: franksolich
Skinner banned threads about chicken????
Ya'll are killin me...lsughin so hard i can hardly type...chicken???
48
posted on
06/23/2005 1:21:52 PM PDT
by
ReeWalker
(Life isn't fair...GET OVER IT!!!)
To: ReeWalker
He sure did ban discussion of fried chicken in there.
Read the thread; it's hilarious.
Andyites talking in "code," apparently.
49
posted on
06/23/2005 1:23:31 PM PDT
by
franksolich
(too many coincidences to be coincidental)
To: franksolich
I guess we now know. Banning of chickens came before the banning of eggs.
SD
To: SoothingDave
But questions related to fundraising or proof of diagnoses are quickly sent to the memory holeBut you can claim that you have posted proof even if you haven't.
51
posted on
06/23/2005 1:28:37 PM PDT
by
SCALEMAN
(Durbin now stands in Jane Fonda's shadow)
To: SCALEMAN
But you can claim that you have posted proof even if you haven't. Yep. And re-post documents in order to answer questions raised by the earlier postings of the same documents.
SD
To: franksolich; Charles Henrickson
You know what goes good with chicken, right? Sure you do:

Burnt cornbread!
53
posted on
06/23/2005 1:34:51 PM PDT
by
Choose Ye This Day
("I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday." -- Abraham Lincoln)
To: ReeWalker
Don't think they would see "truth" if it bit them on the a@@....The sad part is they have seen the proof, and choose to ignore it. LALALALALALALA (fingers in ears... eyes closed.... face red)
A perfect example of the difference in the right and left. The right will 'give up' a crook, while the left will ignore the transgressions and scream at the messenger.
54
posted on
06/23/2005 1:34:52 PM PDT
by
SCALEMAN
(Durbin now stands in Jane Fonda's shadow)
To: SoothingDave; SCALEMAN
If you two are talking about chickens, just knock it off! that sort of subject is taboo now, you know. You can talk about strawberries or baked potatoes but CHICKEN is off limits! Hahahaha!
55
posted on
06/23/2005 1:37:27 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(My family wishes I would cook a meal like they have at Gitmo!)
To: CAluvdubya
No chickens, honest!
(Sitting ducks and stool pigeons are another matter.)
SD
To: CAluvdubya
Can someone explain this to me. How do you have signs that it has spread to the lymph nodes without knowing that it has? surely the lab tests would indicate yea or nay.In my alternate reality world (sorry had to) the doctors routinely remove any adjacent lymph nodes if they even think it could have mestasized there. These would have been excised and carried post haste to pathology.
In some instances, a biopsy of the lymph node is rushed to path while the patient is still 'open' and a quick dx is returned, guiding the surgeon in his/her efforts.
57
posted on
06/23/2005 1:42:21 PM PDT
by
SCALEMAN
(Durbin now stands in Jane Fonda's shadow)
To: CAluvdubya
If you two are talking about chickens, just knock it off!Cluck?
58
posted on
06/23/2005 1:49:19 PM PDT
by
SCALEMAN
(Durbin now stands in Jane Fonda's shadow)
To: SCALEMAN
Colonel Sanders is filing a lawsuit as we speak. DU and FR named!
59
posted on
06/23/2005 1:52:02 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(My family wishes I would cook a meal like they have at Gitmo!)
To: CAluvdubya
60
posted on
06/23/2005 1:53:34 PM PDT
by
franksolich
(too many coincidences to be coincidental)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson