Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity)President Bush Could Pardon Schiavo !
25 Mar 05 | SENTINEL

Posted on 03/25/2005 10:00:29 AM PST by SENTINEL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: .38sw

No, you're correct. Comparing Terri to Jesus Christ, or comparing her impending death to a Satanic ritual is more idiotic than this thread.


61 posted on 03/25/2005 10:35:18 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NEWSHOUND

Well, apparently when following a court order, you can't be charged.

This situation is definitely screwed up.


62 posted on 03/25/2005 10:35:47 AM PST by Terpfen (New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Neets
Did you think this through before you posted it?

Yes, I did. I am not afraid to create controversy to protect the innocent. It disgusts me to no end that some modern leaders are so concerned about offending evil that they fail to act in opposition.

We did not win the Revolutionary war this way, not the civil war, not WW's 1 or 2, and we are not going to win the culture war this way either.

George Washington would act to save Terri !

63 posted on 03/25/2005 10:36:42 AM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Anybody got the "Oh, no, not this $$$$ again!" JPEG?

You betcha!


64 posted on 03/25/2005 10:36:46 AM PST by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

http://www.c-span.org/executive/presidential/ford1_trans.asp

Pardons can be issued on a blanket basis in anticipation of charges filed. Hence it is not necessary to be convicted or even charged to be pardoned. However, it still remains a criminal matter, wholly distinct from Terri's situation.

Besides, I would dispute the notion that Nixon committed no crime. He was never charged or convicted, but that doesn't mean he didn't do it.


65 posted on 03/25/2005 10:38:52 AM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Dog gone, it's useless. I've tried earlier in the week, but this just keeps coming up over and over. Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
66 posted on 03/25/2005 10:39:02 AM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Why is that?


67 posted on 03/25/2005 10:39:38 AM PST by grassboots.org (I'll Say It Again - The first freedom is life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Thank you very much! You might want to keep it handy-- there's so much of it around these days.


68 posted on 03/25/2005 10:39:46 AM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BurtTpa
her religious rights have been violated .

That perhaps is the weakest of all arguments the inept attorneys for the Schindlers tried this week. It has no legal merit whatsoever. I assume they attempted in an effort to rally support from those who are religious, but it was a PR stunt, not a rational legal objection.

69 posted on 03/25/2005 10:39:56 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
Please explain to me the definition of "reprieve."
70 posted on 03/25/2005 10:41:14 AM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: .38sw

That's a great little graphic. I hope people "get it."


71 posted on 03/25/2005 10:42:26 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

"he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment."

I will explain 'reprieve' as soon as you explain which "offenses against the United States" Terri Schiavo has committed.


72 posted on 03/25/2005 10:45:16 AM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I'm not optimistic.


73 posted on 03/25/2005 10:46:20 AM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
"hall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States"

n Entry: 1re·prieve
Pronunciation: ri-'prEv
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): re·prieved; re·priev·ing
Etymology: alteration of earlier repry, perhaps from Middle French repris, past participle of reprendre to take back
1 : to delay the punishment of (as a condemned prisoner)
2 : to give relief or deliverance to for a time

74 posted on 03/25/2005 10:47:15 AM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL
4 entries found for reprieve. re·prieve ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-prv) tr.v. re·prieved, re·priev·ing, re·prieves To postpone or cancel the punishment of. To bring relief to. n. Postponement or cancellation of a punishment. A warrant for such an action. Temporary relief, as from danger or pain. Looks like the definition fits.
75 posted on 03/25/2005 10:47:54 AM PST by grassboots.org (I'll Say It Again - The first freedom is life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

You need to learn to diagram a sentence. Both 'reprieves' and 'pardons' are tied to "for offenses against the United States."

So again: which offenses against the United States has Terri Schiavo committed?


76 posted on 03/25/2005 10:49:50 AM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL
...for offenses against the United States"

you forgot this part. What offenses has Mrs. Shiavo committed aginst the United States for which President Bush can pardon her, using his Constitutional authority? Look, I understand the issue here, and the passion for saving her, but do we really want a president who will act as a dictator?

77 posted on 03/25/2005 10:50:01 AM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
Terri has committed no offense against the United States, but has been sentenced to die of starvation...right now.

Charles manson has been on death row for how many years, 20, 30 ?

An individual state has no authority to deprive an innocent of life, never has, never will.

President Bush is just as justified in acting to help Terri as Lincoln was in going forward with the civil war.

78 posted on 03/25/2005 10:53:48 AM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org

It fits just fine if you remove it from context. But not if you read the sentence properly.


79 posted on 03/25/2005 10:53:56 AM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
If George Bush personally walked down to that hospice and removed Terri Schindler from her death - that would make him a Dictator?

Saving an innocent life cannot be a dictatory act. (Besides the fact that he took an oath to uphold the constitution including the 14th Amendment which includes the right to life.)

80 posted on 03/25/2005 10:54:41 AM PST by grassboots.org (I'll Say It Again - The first freedom is life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson