I dont even think that picture is legal...if that girl is under 18 it sure seems like child porn to me...
Posted on 01/26/2005 2:02:32 PM PST by Perdogg
No.
This ran yesterday, I believe. It is a duplicate. And my answer is a skirt with suspenders is not a dress, even if it's a formal.
I have no daughters, but I would have been offended if one of their dates came to my house looking like that.
I was going to say that normally I'm not consulted when my daughters get prom dresses.
But after seeing it, I have to say "No." But I'm sure my wife would have gotten in her veto before I had the chance to.
Good grief.
Hell i would love to wear thart dress its smashing
Ok Perdogg, I'm questioning your posting of this article (pic)...I'm sure it was purly out of shock ! Hummmm??? lol
Well, I gotten more reponses out of this posting than the one I posted about noon eatern time.
As for my daughters well.....she is always teased by her friends about her "large" bust line to the point where she is quite shy. I know that her prom dress, just bought, is quite demur!
I hope it wasn't the same one?! :0
I feel like I just looked at kiddie porn.
And no - that isn't 'formal wear', but 'skank wear'.
"I dont even think that picture is legal...if that girl is under 18 it sure seems like child porn to me..."
I posted the same reply before reading yours and totally agree.
Uh, huh..he wouldn't let his own daughter wear it! That statement from the scum bucket CEO is just to cause more excitement about the dress. What an immoral jerk!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.