Skip to comments.
Family complains about Christmas porn
modbee.com ^
| 12/28/2004
| associated press
Posted on 12/30/2004 6:15:25 AM PST by bedolido
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Just another Joe
So they get a Christmas gift like this and then COMPLAIN? No kidding! Who wouldn't like "A Very Special Porno XXXMas?"
To: Tijeras_Slim
a naked female, just standing there does not comport with any rational definition of "porn"
Would Helen Thomas be considered obscenity?
I almost had to rip out my frontal lobes out to remove that imagry.
22
posted on
12/30/2004 6:46:30 AM PST
by
crazyhorse691
(We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
To: darkwing104
Actually there is nothing in the article to suggest that they viewed it for more than an instant before realizing unwanted porn was being fed into their living room - albeit at a channel and time that the cable company admits should not have contained porn.
Why are you pointing fingers at the couple?
To: bedolido
Where is the part that says he waited to see the "money shot" just to be sure it was porn, before he complained? /humor
24
posted on
12/30/2004 6:47:25 AM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(Never underestimate the power of a cacophony of Cowbells played in unison...It shocks the mind.)
To: bedolido
"Oh Come, All Ye Faithful".
To: Notwithstanding
Why are you pointing fingers at the couple?Not pointing the finger at anyone. Just making an observation
26
posted on
12/30/2004 6:49:29 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: darkwing104
The problem is that you manufactured this "observation": the couple saw the "get-the-hell-out-of-here pornography" and apparently got the porn the hell off their TV.
Your comment - which it total conjecture - implies they continued to watch the porn show before complaining.
To: Notwithstanding
Oh, but it is a funny thread.
28
posted on
12/30/2004 7:15:17 AM PST
by
Jaded
(Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society. - Mark Twain)
To: Notwithstanding
The problem is that you manufactured this "observation": the couple saw the "get-the-hell-out-of-here pornography" and apparently got the porn the hell off their TV.OK...Prove it
29
posted on
12/30/2004 8:33:53 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: darkwing104
Actually, in a local TV interview the wife claimed she immediately turned it off. It just comes down to their word, the rest is conjecture. But I guess there's been a problem in the past with this local access channel. I don't get that one on my cable. Oh well...
To: unbalanced but fair
Actually, in a local TV interview the wife claimed she immediately turned it off. It just comes down to their word, the rest is conjecture.It doesn't state that in the article.
I am reminded of a Dennis Miller quipt "Let us with a free hand cast the first stone".
31
posted on
12/30/2004 8:53:55 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; xsmommy; NYC GOP Chick; SeaDragon; RikaStrom; hobbes1; Argh; ...
"I saw mommy doing a whole lot more than just tickle Santa Claus"
SPL (the Salacious Ping List) ping.
If you want on or off the list let me know.
32
posted on
12/30/2004 8:56:58 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(I care, just not very much.)
To: darkwing104
Whoa...I was just letting you know what I saw on TV. Thought you might be interested, that's all.
To: unbalanced but fair
Whoa...I was just letting you know what I saw on TV. Thought you might be interested, that's all.No Problem...Thanks
34
posted on
12/30/2004 9:02:12 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: dubyaismypresident
35
posted on
12/30/2004 10:57:49 AM PST
by
Happygal
(liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
To: Happygal
36
posted on
12/30/2004 10:58:50 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(I care, just not very much.)
To: darkwing104
You made the wild and false allegation against these people, and you got called on it - you have the burden of proof.
To: Notwithstanding
You made the wild and false allegation against these people, and you got called on it - you have the burden of proof. I don't have to prove something that wasn't printed. No allegations, just an observation from the facts that were presented in the article. It's called analysis.
You were the only one to read something into it. In basic psychology it's a sign of guilt for something on your part.
I ,in turn, asked you to prove something you cannot prove...Deal with it.
38
posted on
12/30/2004 6:35:52 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson