Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Question is Now...
myself | 9/9/04 | KosmicKitty

Posted on 09/09/2004 5:43:41 PM PDT by KosmicKitty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Freepers, what does everyone think??
1 posted on 09/09/2004 5:43:42 PM PDT by KosmicKitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

Been wondering the same thing myself


2 posted on 09/09/2004 5:46:51 PM PDT by blastdad51 (Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
I think it doesn't matter, because CBS will NEVER tell. They will put the whole thing on Rather, and he will eat it like he was on Fear Factor.
3 posted on 09/09/2004 5:47:04 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

I think it's a fascinating question.

My present guesses are that it was either the work of a
seriously incompetent forger, a DNC saboteur, or is just
a gag that's been floating around and someone stumbled
onto it.

Barnes is a potential source on the "incompetent" theme.

Hillary is a source on the sabotage theme - she knows
exactly what CBS would fall for.

One the gag theme, I suspect that there are fake docs
abroad on the net that say virtually anything about
anyone. Many become urban legends. Did CBS fall for one?


4 posted on 09/09/2004 5:48:09 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

I sure hope we find out. I think it is someone close to Kerry's campaign. Funny how they came to be after Carville and Begala came on board. Please let us find out who is responsible. That will finish Kerry.


5 posted on 09/09/2004 5:48:54 PM PDT by dormee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

I think we will be able to tell tomorrow by watching Kerry if he is connected to this an any way.


6 posted on 09/09/2004 5:49:38 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

Time to resurrect DEEP THROAT!! Where are Woodward and Bernstein when we really need them?


7 posted on 09/09/2004 5:49:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blastdad51
Bingo!
8 posted on 09/09/2004 5:49:42 PM PDT by CT (Oppose Left Wing Anti-American 'Hatriotsim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

I wouldn't discount the possibility of it being a deranged DUer either. ;)


9 posted on 09/09/2004 5:50:31 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Anyone seen Al Franken lately?


10 posted on 09/09/2004 5:51:16 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

It could be Rove who planted the docs knowing the morons in the media would salivate, jump and forget to do due diligence. This, of course, leads to yet another media poop storm and all the oxygen is sucked out of the floundering Kerry campaign. Furthermore, the Nat'l Guard story becomes a liability for Kerry and thus he drops it.

Personally, I would love to see Kerry continue to pound away on this issue because the next Swift ad will simply point out how Kerry was basically absent from all his requirements after he came back from Vietnam.

What do you guys think?

-T


11 posted on 09/09/2004 5:52:13 PM PDT by timbuck2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
Who forged the document??

Based on the way it is turning out we have to consider the possibility that it was CARL ROVE.

12 posted on 09/09/2004 5:52:37 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

"Who forged the document??"

Why blame Bush of course...


13 posted on 09/09/2004 5:54:08 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

Well now that you heard the W in GWB means "W"rong, now you know what the "F" in JFKerry means "F"raud! CBS either did this on purpose or their entire credabilty is in doubt... either way it is in doubt. They must have used a document examiner whom they knew would verify the false document, IMHO.

The FONT is MSWORD, the next of kin "I am upset because I think it is a mixture of truth and fiction here," said Gary Killian, son of Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, who died in 1984. Killian also said his dad never would write such a document (one unsigned) ...and the General, Staudt mentioned in the letters was RETIRED! So much for facts. When the News as with the Left disregads facts, the country is in trouble and needs to prevent a LEFT COUP!


14 posted on 09/09/2004 5:57:25 PM PDT by Henchman (I Hench, therefore I am!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
Who forged the document??

George W. Bush forged the document in 1973, surreptitiously placing it in the commander's files, knowing that it would be uncovered one day while he was pursuing political office. His plan was to then let people on the Internet (which because of his father's CIA ties he knew would evolve into what it is today because of inside DARPA info) "uncover" the fraud. Dan Rather is actually a mole placed in the media decades ago by the Bush family, awaiting the day when he would be called upon to reveal the doctored "evidence" on national TV.

Man, it's simple. If you can't see it, you don't belong on DU.

15 posted on 09/09/2004 6:00:10 PM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timbuck2; KosmicKitty

> It could be Rove who planted the docs ...

As I said on another thread:

But the fact is that on reflection, the forgeries are SO
inept that it would have been too risky to proffer them,
because the odds of them getting rejected were too high.

Yes, the DNC/CBS lust for power blinded them, but a
trickster could not rely on it.

Which is to say that a Rove trick would have have been
far more sophisticated. But apart from that, I really
sense that the WH does not want anything prior to 1973
to be a campaign issue. They are trying to take the
high road, and Kerry and his allies just won't let the
history go.


16 posted on 09/09/2004 6:03:27 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

My guess is Begala and Carville.


17 posted on 09/09/2004 6:03:32 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland

Obviously the men in black at area 51 have a time machine,
they went back and planted these KNOWING they were fake.

Have you heard about the scam where you invest $1000 and
it's deposited at a good rate of interest for 100 years but
then there will be time travel and the investor will come
back and bring you your account TOMORROW!

Sucha deal!


18 posted on 09/09/2004 6:08:23 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Have you heard about the scam where you invest $1000 and it's deposited at a good rate of interest for 100 years but then there will be time travel and the investor will come back and bring you your account TOMORROW!

It's not a scam, man. Yesterday I had to buy another warehouse to store all my cash. I'm becoming concerned that I may trigger an inflationary spiral in the national economy at the rate I'm going.

19 posted on 09/09/2004 6:14:59 PM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
CBS forged them, at least some staffers at CBS did. They probably saw it as a way to "get in" with Rather.

Remember, this is the same news organization that staged the exploding fuel tanks not so long ago. It made for very impressive news footage and was really "hard hitting" investigative journalism at it's best -- up until it was all exposed as a fraud.

The CBS quibbling over their "authentication" of the documents by experts, recently downgraded to some folks think the documents express the "opinion" of Killian (hearsay of hearsay) just reinforces my belief.

20 posted on 09/09/2004 6:27:35 PM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson