Skip to comments.
Did NASA Accidentally “Nuke” Jupiter?
The Enterprise Mission ^
| 11/6/2003
| Richard C. Hoagland
Posted on 11/07/2003 9:18:58 AM PST by Yo-Yo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: Yo-Yo
The term: Popcorn-fart comes to mind.
Get serious!
21
posted on
11/07/2003 9:46:13 AM PST
by
Hunble
To: Yo-Yo
.
22
posted on
11/07/2003 9:49:35 AM PST
by
Faith65
To: Centurion2000
And just where did this retard get his degree ..... the nuclear batteries are U-238, NOT 235 and not plutonium.Actually, they ARE plutonium.
But the idea that there's enough oomph there to create a runaway burn a la Teller's "Classical Super" is downright silly. There's a reason that the Classical Super wouldn't work: the device would radiate away the heat of the nuclear blast before it could raise the thermonuclear fuel to the ignition point.
23
posted on
11/07/2003 9:49:47 AM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Yo-Yo
Actually I take my previous post back .... this is fascinating ..... and I hope we do light off Jupiter as a second mini sun .... we get 4 more terrestrial planets to play with.
24
posted on
11/07/2003 9:50:22 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
To: Yo-Yo
bump for later reading
25
posted on
11/07/2003 9:50:26 AM PST
by
WillRain
To: Centurion2000
And just where did this retard get his degree ..... the nuclear batteries are U-238, NOT 235 and not plutonium. Actually, they're PLUTONIUM-238. See here for facts about Galileo's RTGs.
As for the "implosion" thing -- it's completely bogus. A plutonium bomb requires very precise compression, and very high implosion speeds. Atmospheric crushing would be uneven, and very slow.
26
posted on
11/07/2003 9:52:02 AM PST
by
r9etb
To: John H K
Hoagland is a lunatic. Lunatics are common, but there's a tiny handful that have, at some point, a credible resume. They're the worst kind of kooks. Those guys can really make some money peddling books and such, though.
I didnt get the impression that he really believed that this happened. He was just trying to imagine a way that Galileo could possibly have caused this spot, no matter how unlikely.
I think it was just a harmless mental excersize.
27
posted on
11/07/2003 9:52:04 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: ElkGroveDan
This sounds like a crock of Jovian doo-doo.
Pu-238 is not Pu-239. The triggering of a nuclear explosion is extremely delicate. The nuclear material must be of sufficient mass in the proper geometry, and a source of neutrons must be present at precisely the correct instance. I see no reason to believe that any of the above conditions were met. I think that a fission explosion can be easily ruled out.
But, suppose I am wrong (hey, it happens). How do we proceed to a thermonuclear (fusion) explosion? It is extremely hard to do so. It took the USA over five years after World War II to figure out how to do it. Postulating a fission explosion in the Jovian atmosphere, what happens? Well, the surrounding gas is heated, expands, and the energy is dissipated well before there is a fusion reaction.
In short, this speculation is balderdash and whimsey.
28
posted on
11/07/2003 9:52:35 AM PST
by
bagman
To: Poohbah
oops .... missed that in the details ..... but Fermi had a bet that the same bomb type would ignite our atmosphere ... and that didn't happen.
29
posted on
11/07/2003 9:52:36 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
To: All
30
posted on
11/07/2003 9:54:02 AM PST
by
TastyManatees
(http://www.tastymanatees.com)
To: John H K
So, by describing him as a lunatic and kook it's easy to dismiss anything he says rather than having to refute his purported facts. He may be trying to make money from such speculation but I don't think he's a "KOOK".
31
posted on
11/07/2003 9:55:03 AM PST
by
dljordan
To: Prime Choice; John H K
This strikes me as tinfoil hat nonsense...especially when considering that the impacts of the Shoemaker-Levy comet fragments easily delivered over 20 times the wallop of the Galileo collision and even that didn't start a thermonuclear chain reaction.
Well, a comet isn't made of potentially fissionable material...but I digress. Hoagland is a kook-and-a-half, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. It at least bears a little additional fact-checking.
I, for one, would like to know if the "dark spot" in question was truly being ignored...or was it just another photographic artifact that Hoagland has chosen to hype....guess I better do a little digging.
32
posted on
11/07/2003 9:56:25 AM PST
by
beezdotcom
("Where there's smoke, there's an anti-smoking lobby...")
To: Yo-Yo
No wonder they hate us!!!
To: Yo-Yo
Very entertaining "what-if" scenario until that ridiculous astronomer-conspiracy nonsense. Yeesh!
34
posted on
11/07/2003 9:57:37 AM PST
by
Kirkwood
To: WackyKat
Wasn't Hoagland involved with something about a spaceship or something in AZ, but nobody could see because the gov't or the space aliens caused it to snow or some such BS
35
posted on
11/07/2003 9:58:24 AM PST
by
sticker
To: Poohbah
I read his book "Behold a Pale Horse". He said the government was trying to kill him the crazy guy. He was so paranoid that he managed to stage his own death in a "shootout" with thirteen sheriff's deputies and state troopers. Totally wacky.
36
posted on
11/07/2003 9:58:45 AM PST
by
dljordan
To: Yo-Yo
When looking for a giant bag of heated gas, one has to look no further than Richard C. Hoagland, Jupiter-sized blow-hard.
37
posted on
11/07/2003 10:00:35 AM PST
by
Hoosier-Daddy
(It's a fight to the death with Democrats.)
To: Yo-Yo
The Clinton Legacy....
The first US president to allow WMDs to be used against Extra Terrestrials....
To: Yo-Yo
This is funny. Just TRY keeping the pieces together.
39
posted on
11/07/2003 10:05:05 AM PST
by
lepton
To: Centurion2000
The spacecraft carried several pounds of plutonium packaged in small pieces so there would be no danger of a critical mass in case the launch were aborted.
40
posted on
11/07/2003 10:10:20 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson