Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: The Old Hoosier
No. In the primary we voted for Jones. We had hoped because of his stature (He was WELL KNOWN, vs. Simon being an UN KNOWN) and the "Three Strikes Law" he sponsored that he would have enough NATIONAL attention to garner votes, but it seems because he backed McCain, he didn't get President Bush's endorsement, and thus didn't get the Republican endorsement.

As we know, that was a fatal error. We ended up with Simon and LOST.

In hindsight, we would have been better off with Riordon if we couldn't back Jones!!
13 posted on 08/12/2003 10:25:04 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
In hindsight, we would have been better off with Riordon if we couldn't back Jones!!

The only difference between Riordan and Davis is that Davis supports the death penalty. And you would support him in hindsight...why?

And Arnold, who is just a muscular version of Riordan?

14 posted on 08/12/2003 10:28:30 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
BTW, Jones would have been a better candidate, I agree with that.
15 posted on 08/12/2003 10:29:10 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson